Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
Poleaxe, you are correct . It looks like the % is calculated without "Nil" paid shares.
Look at todays RNS on Goldman Sachs holding. 810264 shares is equated to 3.467%, which means on 20 odd million shares.
Good luck to all tomorrow.
Going by the voting pattern of the 7th July General meeting, it looks certain that the present Board will be voted out. But will or should the new nominees be voted in ? I have strong reservations against it. Selecting CEOs, CFOs and even the NEDs are a long and meticulous process involving people at the highest ownership levels in a company. Here out of nowhere , someone with a meagre 5% ownership selects a bunch of people and wants to install them as Directors. This is not on.
As was pointed out here , they are taking over a company without paying any premium, which again is ridiculous.
But again what is puzzling is why aren't there be a predator for this company so that the issues that are being discussed over and over again could be put to rest once and for all.
The company is now valued at almost 20% less than the cash to be received in February 24. Wont it be feasible for someone to pay a 50% premium and take over the company???. Whatever said and done , some of the patents the company had fetched $150mn. Surely the residual patents should have some value which the market is unable to gauge as it did before the Samsung settlement.
The events that are taking place and the way the present Board and the so called future board are behaving are so disgusting and frustrating.
May not be big, but something.
https://www.nanocotechnologies.com/blog/nanoco-and-poe-sign-licensing-and-collaboration-agreement/
A 2,500,000 trade on the 14th April @19.75p reported today. in the LSE.???
I am also one who lost out on this litigation expectations. But then, looking back on the whole issue, who expected in 2020 that we will get $150 mn from Samsung. If we - those in this board and the major shareholders - had the capacity to assess it and risk some capital we need not have paid the funders a whopping $45 mn ( legal costs are estimated @ 10to 15 mn) . That is the level of our risk appetite. So grumbling about the settlement and blaming every one else doesn't make much sense. In fact the Chairman has said in the RNS that they received 3 times that of their lower estimate.
Even now, the market is valuing company at the cash equivalent that we would be getting. No value is attached to the Patents, IP etc which the company have in plenty. It is ridiculous, but then, that is how market operates. We may realise true value only if there is a Take over approach or some major contract wins or big royalty payments. I am positive and hoping something good will happen. GLA
My interpretation of "unlikely " is, in the context of things , is definite. Let us see how it goes.
No way license will be removed. There are number of companies who have been at fault like the ones 888 committed, but ended with fines and warnings. See the Gambling Commissioners website for the number of such cases in the recent past. If they were to remove licenses for these offences there wont be any betting companies would be existing today.
https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news/
In fact Gibraltor commissioner has said specifically license will not be withdrawn.
Dogger, I am not yet with you. Give some honest views as to why it is going to be over, then I would consider.
Despite BT claiming the agreement with Samsung being the best, why haven't none of the directors bought into the stock, now that the sensitivity of the information gone. Surprising.
https://www.chargedretail.co.uk/2023/01/30/thg-ingenuity-and-digital/
BT pension reported £11bn drop in value of assets (out of £57bn) . Same here . Dec21 pension assets were £ 2.6 bn& LDI was £0.9 by. In June 22 pension assets dropped to £ 2.0bn and LDI was £0.56 by, also a drop of 20% on total assets & reduction in LDI. Don’t know how the interest rate spike in sept/ oct impacted.No RNS.
To my knowledge Serco & Royal Mail have paid on this as reported by news papers. No RNS. & that too soon after the budget. Looks like it won’t impact the operating financials of the companies. We had the Trading update on the 11th & by then the company should have known/ paid if any .
Kim , Thank you so much
Under position it states " PCA of Matthew Moulding " . What does this mean ? Can anyone clarify please. Thanks.
Mark Q: Just out of curiosity . I noticed in this page saying the analyst consensus data represents a summary of the forecasts made by sell side investment analysts. why do they get only the sell side analyst figures. Would that be different if buy side analysts cover this. Bit confusing.
An extract from Q3 update:
" Our confidence is further supported by a strong pipeline of new client wins expected to complete during the fourth quarter of 2021, and a substantial order book of over 280 new websites for existing clients, which will see the total number of live websites increase from 163 to 400 by the end of 2022."
Anyone has an idea of the number of brands that have already gone into the Ingenuity platform from Nestle. I noticed 3 already
Please read the expert views on the repeal.
https://observer.com/2020/08/paramount-consent-decrees-implications-future/
I was thrilled with the following
Still, the termination of the Paramount Consent Decrees is the result of a consistent emphasis on deregulation across various sectors of business. It’s consistent with the economic policies of the last 20-30 years, according to Professor J. Christopher Hamilton, an assistant professor at Syracuse’s S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications with a focus on television, radio, film and interactive digital media who previously worked at Lionsgate, Turner and Viacom. He sees potential value in opening the doors to innovation across the film industry.
“A company like Google or Amazon owning a theater chain presents a whole new proposition for consumption and engagement of their consumers,” Hamilton told Observer. “Instead of thinking of movie theaters as older institutions, what if it was an entertainment-based destination where there are games and food? Interactive theatrical experiences? Imagine a mini-Disneyland where families can go, or just think of Dave and Busters multiplied by twenty.”
Amazon owns popular video game streaming app Twitch and could use the theaters to not only show movies but also international gaming events, which appeals to younger demographics not currently engaging in traditional theatrical experiences. Disney has the potential to provide a combo Disney Store + Theater experience, not to mention their ownership of ESPN and the ability to play live sporting events on huge screens. However, this underscores the reality that independent companies without the benefit of added value will likely be forced into selling out to one system or another. The opposition, however, argues that independent films represent a much smaller portion of the overall market and that the Paramount decision was not intended to put limits on the entire industry based on a small percentage of the overall market.
The theatrical model—usher herds of people into a dark room as many times as possible—has remained largely unchanged for decades. The potential benefit of change is that a consumer can experience all the various mediums and innovations when it comes to content delivery.