Member Info for Kojak61

Yes, Barclays is good, I just checked as I thought they had a monthly fee of £4, but I see they ditched it, and their trades are only £6.

Hi Rabbit999, Hargreaves Lansdown are good, they don't charge monthly, but they charge a one off £11.95 for each trade up to 9 trades in a month. Pointless if you want to buy/sell below a £500 investment, as that adds £11.95 which is 2.39% of 500. Its goes down to £8.95 per trade if you do more than 9 trades in a month.

And there's an annual fee of 0.45% of the value of the stocks and ETFs. For £500 it would be £2.25 for the year.

They do Neo and there's never any problem buying anything there and trades go through instantaneous. I use HL and 212. 212 sometimes doesn't let you trade or it goes straight to execute when available. Their range of products is very limited compared to HL, and as you say they don't have Neo.

I'd recommend HL.

Thank you Justfencing :-)

Thanks, but it doesn't work.

All they've got to do is put the PDF on Neo's site, what's the big deal? If they want to make it private to investors set up Neo's site so we have to register instead of going around in circles with external links that you have to pay for. And if it's the old Report what's the point of saying it's new. I don't know if it's the new one or the old one as each person seems to be quoting different things.

The link is on Neo's site now, but it takes us to the Researchgate link and if you're not a paid member you can't view it.

The PDF needs to be added.

Maybe being able to buy depends on the platform you use. I am on Hargreaves Lansdown and can buy intsanteous.

But my friend has a problem with Barclays.

Done! https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09837001

Someone's confident, they blew £172.17k on

97,714 shares today.

P2 The Forward Looking Statement says the presentation is in connection with the possible issue of shares.

p6 confirms that

p5 reiterates Sibanye's pre-emptive rights, they may get some.

In the Q&A Jason was asked if any share offering would be given to current shareholders, and he said yes.

(So maybe we could get the first dib at getting some before they shoot up)

Then I suppose institutional investors.

Then the public.

Yes it would dilute, but it would also avoid debt, and the finance would get the show on the road. and that's when the price will rocket. Any drops because of dilution should quickly recover, and Sibanye have a say on what placements offerings happen so they won't let it go mad.

A note, be aware there's a timeline error page 17, first production and cash flow is Q2 and Q4 2027, not 2026.

page 18 has it correct Q2 2027.

GLA

Sorry ifiknew, but what are wogas and false IIs?

There's still some activity in posts. 3 hrs ago.

https://x.com/JB_MiningAfrica/status/1993700926859739272?t=tvehtxEbAG1xvvJiLJvQgg&s=19

It's not perfect, we want it all sorted now, we've waited too long, but it's still being talked about.

This gives me some hope.

It could still go tits up, but I think if it was a total f**k up and they knew the only way was down it would go deathly silent, NO answering phone calls or emails, no RNSs, no comments or posts, profiles disappearing, Sibanye would pull out

Why bother posting if it were about to collapse, why pretend?

Unless if so, this is just a part of the deception.

It's being publicised around the media, which I suppose is a good sign!

https://www.tipranks.com/news/company-announcements/neo-energy-metals-prepares-for-trading-resumption-and-strategic-growth

https://www.investing.com/news/company-news/neo-energy-shares-remain-suspended-amid-audit-delays-93CH-4362750

https://www.share-talk.com/neo-energy-metals-prepares-to-lift-trading-suspension-as-major-asset-acquisitions-advance/

https://www.investegate.co.uk/announcement/rns/neo-energy-metals--neo/corporate-update/9239022

It's a wierd world when a company publishes a positive RNS, and four times as many people sell shares (284,448) than buy them (64,915) I dread to think what would happen if something negative happened.

"On completion of the Proposed Transaction, the Europa Board will be reconstituted with representatives from Marula’s current Board of Directors assuming the majority of executive and non-executive roles including current Chief Executive Officer Jason Brewer and Chairman Richard Lloyd."

https://www.share-talk.com/marula-mining-plc-aqse-maru-a2x-mar-proposed-acquisition-of-marula-africa-mining-holdings-limited/#:~:text=On%20completion%20of%20the%20Proposed,Brewer%20and%20Chairman%20Richard%20Lloyd.

quote from here:

Marula produces materials and has revenue from this but the company doesn't make a profit yet.

Europa Metals doesn't produce anything yet, so relies on external funding to opertate. That's why Europa want Marula to help generate income. https://www.miningreview.com/news/proposed-acquisition-of-marula-africa-mining-holdings-limited/#:~:text=As%20a%20Europa%20shareholder%20being,JSE%20listed%20African%20mining%20group.

This is what's happening:

Europa Metals Ltd. is proposing to acquire Marula Africa Mining Holdings, a reverse takeover that would integrate both companies and their producing and near-producing assets. For Marula shareholders, this will result in them receiving new Europa shares (9 for every 1 Marula share) and the prospect of benefiting from Europa's cash flow from its existing operations.

Acquisition details

Buyer: Europa Metals Ltd.

Acquired company: Marula Africa Mining Holdings

Exchange ratio: Europa will issue 9 new shares for each Marula share.

Deal structure: A reverse takeover, where Europa is acquiring Marula Africa.

Expected benefits for Europa: Immediate cash flow from Marula's operations and an expanded footprint in critical minerals.

Board changes: Marula's CEO and chairman will be appointed to the Europa board upon completion.

Impact on Marula shareholders

Shareholders will receive new shares: Marula shareholders will exchange their Marula shares for new Europa shares at a ratio of 9 Europa shares for every 1 Marula share.

Potential for immediate cash flow: Shareholders will indirectly benefit from Marula's existing operating mines, which are expected to generate immediate cash flow for Europa.

Dilution: The issuance of new shares will dilute existing Europa shareholders' ownership.

Increased potential: Marula shareholders will have a stake in a larger, more diverse company with expanded assets in East and Southern Africa.

Hi Ritcie, If they're waiting for that why not just say so, most of us would go aahhhhh! And beable to relax a bit.

They haven't provided the last RNS as promised, if there's a reason why, why not not just say why, and we'd all be a bit more patient, still frustrated but at least we'd know why and it would make them seem more professional.

For example they are well overdue with the accounts, Companies House and the LSE might take action and we could be de-listed, not just suspended. Again, if there's a delay for some real reason and they're in contact with those organisations to make sure that de-listing doesn't, why not just say so.

Can any one tell me what these fillings mean on Compnaies House? My limited knowledge of stocks is stopping me from understaning what's going on.

There are eleven, all posted today 29th October, but dating from 9th April 2024 up to 21st May 2025.

Nine are 'Statements of Capital Following Allotment of Shares' two are 'Replacement Filings'.

No one asked the direct question in the Q&A, or it was asked but bypassed , WHY weren't they published, and when will they be? The closest we got was "we are still waiting for finalising the aquisition from Stillwater, is that why we're still in suspension?" Jason said "no, it's only for the accounts, it should have come out today, it's an ongoing process" the question of accounts didn't go any further and got brushed aside. So.... the question is still "Why aren't the accounts published, and when will they be?"