Member Info for keeptofacts

more importantly, scotforth will have tried to sell this data / methodology to sound.
the fact that experts in the field have not taken them up on the offer tells us one of two things.
either we don't need the extra data or the data adds no value,

the fact they are negotiating a GSA might be a hint.
the fact that they have arranged agreements for pipeline construction.
oh, and rns

you really must try harder.

the gas we have is ALREADY commercial.

I would expect today to have been the bottom, baring complete failure obviously.
close to level by close and rise tomorrow is my guess.

sorry about typos, but you get the gist.

sorry, that ios cpompletely incorrect.
the GSA is FOR EXISTING DISCOVERY ONLY.

how many times do we need to states this?

it will have implications / set a precedent for future sales agreements (by whomever owns Tendrara) but that is it.

if your theory ewas correct there could be no GSA until every single possible well had been completed!

MMs do NOT stockpile shares.
mosty are explicitly banned from doing so.
they amke their money on the spread - nothing else.

theories of mms stockpiling shares is bb BS

literally every post you have made back to August talks about sp dropping.
nothing else, ever!

guess the hint is in your name :)

there is no poumd sign in your post, copied below

"As I have said in the past, it's the people who invested in at 0.80p+ that I feel sorry for. GLA"

NO
0.80p is less than a penny
0.80£ is 80p

good grief!

never buy into a company where two directors are married to each other.

do you need to try hard to be such a tw&t, or does it come naturally?

that three weeks went quick :)

think you might be talking b0llox

spud date 17th October
TD between 35 and 45 days
so TD could be as early as 21st November
today is 2nd november
possible TD in 2 1/2 weeks
yet you think we are three weeks away from second casing point!
we are only 4 weeks away from the latest anticipated TD date!

this character has started posting (some might say promoting) a technique his company has developed.
the same technique the experts at Schlumberger and Sound have decided NOT to use.
he / she has also started to (not very) subtlely suggest that he has sold out or gone short based on his evidence.
some might say he / she has an agenda.
do you think the two companies that have invested a year and millions of $s maximising the chance of success of these wells, would have ignored a seemingly (to grh) failproof technique? without good reason?
do you also think they would have allowed a third party access to run tests around te9?
fantasist springs to mind.

you reckon Schlumberger can't estimate a drill timeline in geolgy they've already drilled and with their years of experience?

in Sound.

Suffolk myself, although a blow in of only 20 years :)

whilst you waste your life writing your gibberish, the drill keeps on turning

:)

hope that helps

that is factually incorrect.
there is plenty of cash in the bank IF SOU had thought 3d worthwhile.
they didn't.

this is NOT a wild cat well.
you are materially wrong regarding chance of success.
the stated cos is greater than 30% (which is as good as exploration wells get).

you are either really thick or trying to cheat hareholders out of their shares. which is it?