Member Info for keeptofacts

fictitous l2 comment has been removed as has the one I was replying to.
hmm

trying again :)

that would be unbelievably unproffesional
there is not a chance that is the case.

seen put a negative slant on buying shares.

ffs get a grip!

how can the probability of 1 well failing be .75 when the probability of 1 well succeeding is .30?
that gives a probability of 1 well failing or succeeding as greater than 100%

simple maths eh :)

I was always a long term holder ...

except the slow few who will keep trying for a day or so before moving on.

this afternoon does 'feel' different

you got your timing wrong.
stop trying to blame everyone else.
you chose to invest and when.

exactly the response I expected.

I note with interest your fictitious 'JP sell' didn't turn up in an rns. wodner why :)

hope ths helps.

I have quickly searched Robbie's posts and can't find a quote re permit from JP.
I mat have missed it as have other things to do.
please provide the quote and date it was posted.

thanks.

well either Robbie is wrong or JP is wrong.
JP quote, thanks Poinkey - "We are not awaiting any permits / permission or anything to be honest."

my comment to you was an explanation why you are (sic) as usual was savaged for negativity.

hope that's clear.

so is Ponkey below or James lieing then?
very clearly states not waiting for permit

From James 25th Sept on a question I posed re-delays:
Hello xxx
We are not awaiting any permits / permission or anything to be honest.

We had some minor delays with the weather (rain caused serious flooding - I’ll forward the video so you have a sense for it). But we are nearly there. Nothing to worry about and actually this week TE10 ground works also began.
James

the problem trellis is that you are unremittingly negative.

boy that cries wolf springs to mind.

te9?

surely this drill is covered by the exisiting exploration permits?

'they' know they only have a few days before spudding. That will be their last chance for a good while (maybe ever) to try to negatively influence the price.

yes, but it's not an exploration company.
companies that are only explorers and not producers NEVER make a profit.
by deffinition, they can't as they are not selling anything, until they sell the compny or asset.

agreed.
I petrsonally don't think his renumeration for running (at one point) a half a billiion pound company is out of order.
my own ceo is paid US$29 Million salary! (it's a US company)

I've given my reasons (logical) for it being a buy.
you only seem able to repeat 'it was a sell'
is that all you've got?

SG - IF it was a sell, please explain the two points below.
these are NOT the characteristics of a sell.

33.690 when the spread was 32.520/32.90
the closest sell got only 32.8111 for a paltry 4015 shares
the offer ROSE immediately afterwards!