Member Info for KB007

I thought the same DG until I got screwed over on PREM based on his musings and affiliation with the board.

When it went t**ts up he flew, never to be heard of again.

I have never been taken in by anyone since

No, you are bang on Pinot

He was mince... left hurriedly after coercing a number of investors to off load here and get into PREM.

Not been heard of since

They can buy a further 43.5 million.

Any more than that then they will have to have the explicit authorisation from SOLG

SOLG shot to 84p based on the Solomon Islands prospective and not Cascabel so please don't cloudy the waters

Only another hour to see how the Canadian Market reacts to the update

elloello - filtered

Another One - DJ Khalid!

Thanks Timmit for clearing that up.

Was a tad worried when assets for the loss were same as profits for new company

If you check the RNS dated 29 Jun 2018 it shows a pre tax loss of £1.8m which was stated to the markets and attributed to Clear Leisure Plc and not Clear Leisure 2017 Ltd

As far as I am aware, please correct me if I am wrong, Clear Leisure 2017 Limited is a small company registered on companies house who has the same directors and is not part of Clear Leisure Plc as it is listed as a seperate company.

Breakdown.
1 - Net assets of Mediapolis at the date of liquidation - 1,798,000
2 - Disposal proceeds less net assets - (1,798,000)
3 - Secured Debt assigned to Clear Leisure - 2,678,000
4 - Amounts paid for assignment of debt (1,250,000)
5 - Write down of unsecured debt - (402,000)
6 - Loss on Disposal of continued operations - (772,000)
7 - Revenue - 63,000
8 - Expenses - (1,112,000)
9 - Loss before Tax - (1,049,000)
10 - Net loss attributable to discontinued operations (1,821,000) = No: 6 (772,000) + No:9 (1,049,000)

Clarify where I am not reading the balance sheet correctly please

Newmont dumped GGP for OMI..

Your ramp says your trying to chases losses greenmile?

If Newmont walked away then don't think RIO would be stupid to jump on ship without any due diligence

Anyway, post on the right board, namely GGP

https://document-api-images-prod.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/docs/0t1SkuJJfdyE7YDDZeOvxjzjfYoothUbhaWVHCbJVIg/application-pdf?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=ASIAWRGBDBV3J2KV6OHQ%2F20181016%2Feu-west-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20181016T152610Z&X-Amz-Expires=60&X-Amz-Security-Token=FQoGZXIvYXdzED0aDPeZi1M%2FB32Ci%2FMSuSK3A%2B0ClhQyHfzDKcEeHUWJbJ9g%2BjbzFUHb0Vik%2Fsauw6VuJRKaI4xdjZ7%2FF%2B2P0cz5M5eVtMQxl%2BUWntiH7FjGLNvgZ8%2Fkyru2kWwT2C6lHaYn6%2B0tG6TuzhgCwhxxU%2BP5Ky3jx%2FJR4KyFYF6cXXGIH7Fd%2BRariExMqSm8SlkyLQmGeirSknpz7sbrjxSVlduaDDHiL1c3oMPVA6BzAmOBUu5byT6yIESW3gjHkI1rvZ2tX8dSXRk%2F1S38mQWPVh6maZ%2FIR7MZ2RvNrTBGnKUtDhC5F9W8KUQ3Mr720x47ARcbxMjaewd5glYNvCFuoni9%2Fa7iaR32P1NzVF%2F0fKstoJM2tQqpiCsj7yKs0zvzq93%2FsW9lxJH6h3FQ%2BOPVqeVmDb1zP6i37UYAb%2BUKSpG2xdmwgJg7ziXc5DMw%2FUVtFu1bziEseAA3ZWuWRJJMI50th9SaewRo%2BYNlqFUWw2u1jTpf47xkgTAt9mLdus4d%2FVYsaufX43a%2BIskqWMjdcKeMkyM7ZQnqmhvKwlkOx%2F7nWkY8Ww1BIAVDl6vxgwyKbvsvSra1MmFxw6T4HwVXl%2BlXqezpHepCgR8oiJuX3gU%3D&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=a10d1ed825fec7eabb5a72f9cea57b46b6a2a0a18a3c0498195aa09933261d1c

Page 19

it was a £1.8m pre tax loss.. Duh!

84p

No, get in now before you do!

I don't think my statement was rude smickster.

You are just too sensitive!

In the current state of play a 50% premium to share price is laughable when broker notes indicate a short term target price of 69-72p.

Only one asset is being spoke of here and if it were just for Cascabel then, yes it may be a possibility that 60p could and I repeat could be a target price.

To ask the question whether I think that it could be possible for a takeover to occur for circa 60-70p then yes I am afraid that statement is laughable.

With SOLG targeting several other major targets within their concessions then, to me, it is obvious that there will be no buy out of the company for 60-70p

That was what I trying to put across.

I have my targets in mind and I can see much much more potential than the figures banded about .

I have learned to excercise a lot of patience with SOLG, as many others will have had, since the penny days.

On the RNS released today investors with itchy feet will not have the required patience nor the wherewithal to hold to reap the full benefit

How is it rude?

You asked the question of me where you stated a price of 60-70p

I gave an answer

However, it uis apparent you offend easily., that's rude!

2 hours till Toronto opens.

Fun afternoon ahead

Unfortunately I have no funds available at the moment.

If I had deep pockets I would probably give anyone 60p for them right here right now.

This is now a long term play, with a minimum of 2 years.

Within the RNS it stated only Cascabel at play and no other projects.

A takeover for 60p is laughable @smickster

This is now a share that will hit mutliple £'s IMHO

Standstill for 2 years

Like i have said previously this is going to production.

On the open market BHP cannot accumulate any further than the equivalent of Newcrest

BHP can only accumulate further through acquisitions, CGP or any other holder.