Member Info for katstrangler

Genius, what were the odds from you last week that you'd be looking at 48 and,maybe, 46?

It's also a bad look for MICA application. does anyone really think that what is, in effect, an in0house family squabble over fraudulent conduct is going to look good going forward?

Nero... you DO waffle.

thank god the mms are holding the 0.40 price because if they drop that youll see some headscratching from you...

Jimzi, of course they do... all the snearing comments about 'green boxes' who then talk about 'taking some more' can only 'take some more' if the price drops.

but if you don't want to discuss the pull on the price...

Well, this 'headless chicken' is still holding off...

... or maybe it's today!

gla.

Ask AI where the production data is for Birmingham... or the now stale news on Germany, or how the 'news panic' on REE/China is now absorbed and just part of everyday news.

Adding the extended deadline for SEC and you have a boredom period to 'take advantage' of. not sure where the floor is or how hard it bounces or when but won't be surprised to see 48... so maybe that day (maybe next week?) will be the 'nice day...'

It was more that M80 are to partner list in NASDAQ, with a 30% free carry on whatever comes... (not that it helped the sp today, though if you'd been in it from last year it's got a similar 'happines factor' for holders.

i've already stated my reason for thinking tat the price won't reach the targets hoped for here but it's just an opinon and i realise i swim against the tide on it.

Personally, i also think 43p low is the target again. now, no doubt if it got to that level there'd be a bump up but when people talk about 200p by end of the year, i admire your belief.

what i'd say is if 80M couldn't beat 1p today when they now have a free carry on a 30% stake in the only new oil licence for greenland, with all the trumpian interest in Greenland for it's oil, fee, security, 'golden dome' and mornoe doctrine then you have to admire that you got 5p > 80p but still wanted more...

you may well get it but i'd have thought most of the low hanging fruit is now picked... fwiw... but feel free to ridicule or counter with general news about rare earths.

I think the idea is they're going to ensure that the buybacks continue over the next TU so there's no imbalance for the shorts to capitalise on them NOT supporting the sp over time. think it'll be continuing in to june/july...

Nero, i remember you still being in this since the day i 'missed a rise' and you still being in it, at 0.4.

seriously, i've 'made' more money by not losing it here since 0.65, never mind the shares i've bought since getting out... oh, and i made on getting in intime for a rise and then got out, also.

how much are you down atm? or are you going to tell me you've been 'trading it' and are still favulously in the black?

Deacs, you'll never get that as it then gives you something o evaluate their progress. they would have to state every move they make to comply... which means that absence of comment would be detrimental. whereas, now, never haivng said anything between rns', they keep the hopeium going. if you don't know then it 'might' be good. but after 3 years and several failed endeavours or acquisitions that never materialised, even though they raised on the implication that the funding was for that, they've run out of trust... for me, at least. but also, for the market.

the only bounce we've had since december was a lying ramp across lse bbs. and the 'good' news they deliver seems to either be incosequential or a last minute save to keep the company going.

finferro wasn't 'genius or 'strategic'... it was throwing money at a company because they didn't get MICA.

they juggle too many balls and end up barely keeping going... where is the Semnet IPO now? and how does the poland pivot/court case look to BoL who are looking for faultless stewardship of a company they bestow a licence to?

i get holders looking for upside but i also get having a clearer eye on not now holding.

gl, though. be happy to see good news and jump onboard.

Deacs, for me it was when there was no follow up on Poland, and then realising that VASP ended in July and there was no way it could apply to Poland for MICA. what it did for Poland is what it should have done in lithuania in 2025... instead it became (as far as i understand it) a stop gap to keep bake afloat in EU. but if EU is meant to be a growth area for the company then i don't see how throwing money into poland was anything other than a fairly despaeate move to keep bake alive in the EU... but they don't seem to have done much with that 'opportunity'... nor do i see how they can with the clock ticking down to july.

if they would literally communicate with their majority shareholders, the retailers, about their intent and put more into the discussion (notice that the 'regular podcasts have now died a death after the embarrassing 5minuter with Wellesley) i don't think they CAN now discuss MICA except in the vaguest terms of 'we are re-applying' and their 'expectations' for success.

that said, it's a never ending horserace, and if things comes good can always get back in. but glad i sold at 0.6s as saved myself another 30%. no point being in at the turn if you pay a big price for being their at that point unless it bags within minutes.

apologies if it sounds negative but, with the sp at 0.4, not sure how else to view it under the circumstances...

Greenland oil is linked to trump, vance, golden dome, monroe doctrine, etc.

if the US press link it it stops being about uk penny stock and becomes about US empire building...

Again, just like the BTC Treasury placing that ended up only using 40% of the rasied funds (and savagedly undercut the sp) the BoD will need to say 'something' to justify the placing.

if you can accept that, with a 2p average they'll need something fairly substantial to allow for all 2.whatever billion shares to move above 2p, they'll be looking to average down. and, as they can't buy 50million shares in the open market easily, they'll punt a placing with some justification. it's either going to be to fund court case or yet another acqusition.

things ain't great atm... July deadline not just for poland end but continuation of make in EU... no real reason to wait to the end of Q1 to reapply for MICA... and is Sept was too late for Dec 31 March - July is getting blooody tight, too, considering there's still no guarantee.

and, if you want to put odds on their success, use your own particular AI to ask how successful MICA applications have been in lithuania in the past year and why binance are moving/moved out of poland... it's dead for crypto come July so GST is banking on lithuania to keep bake's EU trading alive. so will probably need a back up pivot again... more pivots than 'Strictly...''

Again, just an opinion but as there's not much appetite for the shares with a deadline now potentially pushed back (the deadline having been extended) it's much more 'long term than say, M80, where their NASDAQ merger completes in 10-15 days.

just trying to read the trades and the recent rns'.

I said they will use the court case cash funding to push through a placing.

also, why do you think those two agreed to the arbitration and then decided against settling? do you think they want to pay more? or did they go into the aribtration to see GSTs cards? and, again, how did GST NOT know the details of the ypsilon deal and the actual profit margins on that deal when Bai's wife sits on the board of Semnet and, presumably, has full access to their operations?

sorry, but nothing about Semnet has ever stacked up and now the netformx 'deal/partnership is just another tool in netformx box to wheel out when appropriate. but where are the numbers to show its more than just offering them something to use or not use?

just like the BTC treasury angle, they constantly fail to deliver in good time. the whole of poland was a last minute save and, based on lithuania's last fail due to lack of time due to late application, there's a danger of the same again, at least until someone will explain just how long the process will take.

and i'd add, lithuania has prety much pulled the drawbridge up on MICA recently. from several hundred crypto companies in... early 2020, the number now is a small fraction, with most companies realising they just can't pass the scrutiny.

not saying they'll fail (though i suspect it's moot) i'm saying what is the contingency if... how many more short term costly pivots can they pull out?

Loser, do you seriously invest on not knowing something?

i also doubt the court case will contine but for different reasons. just don't believe GST have much of a case as just don't believe, having a wife as a stakeholder, they didn't know what was happening. have no clue what EE and Mervyn are doing now or if they have that money in their coffers. arbitration was just them seeing GST's cards and wouldn't mind betting Bai's nose is out of joint for having wife involved unintentionally or otherwise.

can't see GST wanting this to stretch out but bet they raise funds to 'secure the $4.8million' then put it to one side, probably for nominal sum to 'satisfy honour'.

too much of what goes on is like a family squabble and too internal for the market's satisfaction to see any ii involvement. see what happens by July to feel safe about your investment.

There is no 'awaiting'! you're not a groom waiting to see if the already late bride will actually walk down the isle!

you have no proof of stablecoin entry, you have no proof that MICA reapplication is happening (never mind licence given) and coalculus is just barely a sideline asset.

what BoD need to do is confirm that there is enough time for a reapplication to succeed and what they've done to satisfy BoL... also, what do they do with Poland in July when their companies end their compliance and what is going to happen to bake at that point?

that is the ONLY question you need to be asking yourself and hoping the BoD will answer. as, if MICA doesn't happen, then the EU is closed to bake. and that will be a body blow.

company is sailing extraordinarily close to the wind with their reapplication, giving them no space to play with to comply... just like last time.

the Semnet debacle complicates things for them as it looks like BoD will be distracted in trying to recoup funds needed.

that is why i suspect a placing to come... just in case. whether they announce it's to fund the court case (and then pull the case, just like the BTC funding that then doesn't fund BTC with 60% of it now just being company cash) or whether it's to keep the company afloat should they have... 'complications' by August, i can't see them NOT doing it... the bonuse for the BoD being able to participate in cheapy shares with no effort on the part of the companies success.

no 'awaiting'... do your own guidance and plan for the next six months.

How can GST claim they've been 'misled' in the Semnet deal when Bai wife still owns 20%+ in the company? is he saying he never ever pillow-talked the Semnet deal? how is it possible that they didn't know anything about the profit margin in the Ypsilon deal?

also, what was the lock-in period for the treasury shares that were part of the acquisition? if it was only 12 as opposed to 24 months, then it could be argued that some of the sales since Feb 2025 (?) were them selling the treasury shares. amusingly (or not really, they could technically be like a short as they'd be able, before the claim conclusion, to be buying any sold shares at at least a 50% discount!

question is going to be, if they DO do a placing, is it going to be another one, like the 1.9 and the 1.2, where they do it now in fear of a drop in the sp should, for example, they don't get MICA.

if anyone wants to start posting the upsides and the timelines, feel free as the upside, i suspect, is much different now than it was pre Decmber.