Member Info for katstrangler

But, as ZED moved away from them... just waiting on the contract news.

...unless you're talking about the broker, in which case, carry on!

Rather than just the usual trolling, as it's emphatically an attempt to make investors sell on the fabrication.

i would suggest everyone else reports it to and see about getting this troll binned, properly.

You've turned the bb into your own facebook page, bewailing your disastrous investment in this over months or years. well done for salting the bb so noone uses it!

If you think one poster is going to move 1 billion shares upwards then you credit that individual with more clout then even the BoD.

and, if that's the way to make money then maybe try it yourself? (when all's said and done, making money is what this is about, no?)

If you're still in this in 12months time, without the successes that show a doubling or better of the sp then more fool you.

you need to focus on today and what will move the sp higher now... even if it's just the optimism that whoever holds the new shares saw a good reason for profit from 1.25.

take a macro view and look at the v near term. the longer term is for the birds, until news comes along that confirms a change in prospects.

Bb swamped by a few posters merely restating their own belief about why they bought at the wrong time or why they now believe there is no future in this.

meanwhile, 500million shares were purchased at 1.25 and, as they couldn't possibly have been forward sold, they obviously have a different take on the future, based on their buy price.

people endlessly posting here need to understand the new perspective of this and not keep banging on about the state of the company as it was prior to the fundraise, regardless of your own average.

your job is to make money from this, somehow. detailing the minutiae of some aspect of the company which you're using to self-explain your own investment.

enough with the self-flagellation. either average down and try and make some money on the rise from the drop or just wait for the rise to reduce your paper loss and decide what to do then.

but noone wants to read your mental meanderings on why you bought when you did and its consequences.

sorry, but update your thinking to where we are now, at 1.3.

All holders need a villain when the sp isn't doing what they want it to in the timeframe they want it to. they can't post that they overbought, stupidly on a spike and they can't say their 'dyor' was just reading the rampier posts and diving in on that 'evidence'.

what is funnier is serial trolls who suddenly find jeezus when buying in and then start attacking less euphoric posts. now THAT is funny!

I don't understand this issue with 'trading it' or how people to choose to colour my posts. if the price is dropping i say so. if it hits a support, i say so. if the sp looks like it's consolidating on a weekend with the group hope of a tuesday rns, i say so.

it's more reportage than anything else. if i change my opinion with the trades why am i not ramping it to the high heavens becuase my last add was 0.978? my million shares are still waiting for 1.5 but i don't post guff about 'the sky's the limit' to try and push the sp to my sell price. my trades are tiny in comparison and don't colour my posts.

Thanks, duke. i have a fair amount invested here... but it doesn't stop me having a balanced view of the asset. one thing i knw counters any opinions i hold is the 'positives' and the herd mentality that means whatever good news comes it will over-reach in the short term, allowing me to sell and either move on or wait to see if this falls.

i'm also pragmatic enough to understand that i don't have to squeeze every single fraction of a penny out of a share to still benefit. if the future of stablecoins, etc. are coming good then there's nothing to stop me jumping onboard again and again. as everyone is very keen to state, if the future sp is going to 5. 10, 20 or 100p one isn't blocked from getting in to enjoy another rise.

all i know is, since i swapped my game with GST to 'hold for gold' as opposed to trading the bejeezus out of it my successes with it have diminished. but, having held so far, one gets to feel 'owed' a catch up on the sp so i now hold for a 1.5 spike or better,d epending on the news and how heavily the herd pushes the sp. but i have no doubt that i'll sell the lot and watch... and if it looks like it's still got momentum i'll buy back in but still looking for the resistance.

if i'd risked a significant amount in the 0.3s or 0.4s i doubt i'd have held up to this point. for me, a bagger in one rise is more than enough... i'm all for a second bagging along the way but i'm critical of all aim/small cap shares. we all should be as i've experience of MODE, ARB, pharmas, gold, miners and they all have promise and 99% of them fail to realise their hopes in th elong term.

so that's where i am... i don't expect everyone (or anyone else) to hold my opinion. and that's fine. i feel the majority of posters will counter and conservatism i have about the long term future here.

AHS, you're confusing the size of the raise 'going up' as opposed to the price of the new shares, which have been going down:

1.05 - £1.25mill

1.1 - £847k

1.0 - £750k

2.1 - £1.3mill

and the miserable clns which were knocked out at around an average of. £1.085mill - 0.4ish

isn't it accurate to say the last 3 raises have averaged about 1.05?

just for clarity's sake...

'evening, Bfd.

respect your points... but a couple of retorts:

i know SAR isn't a striaght comparison. it was more the pi expectation over realisation! the point being that one can't rely on pst rns' and consequence to say the same will happen again. there have been several huge spikes in their price that have been, even with the news trigger, conjecture and herd euphoria that 'someone on the board MUST know what they're talking about' and dived in. they had partnerships that were going to move the sp majorly and then... didn't.

but, yes, pharma is a different fish... but the similarity is they're both still starters and tiddlers in the grand scheme of things, seemingly needs placing funds constantly to grow, instead of having profits to fall back on? SAR had milestones, GST have opaque client transactions with no desire to clarify those numbers... until results?

yes, there will be a market for stablecoins. there is also a huge market for crypto currency but not all are created equal. i've no experience of any of them so i don't know where GST's would land in a league table of revenue generation OR what other stablecoins are seeking approval from FCA but it's more than 1 and i assume that not all stablecoins are created equal?

folk have been saying short term trading in GST has been risky for months... i know that as a fact from the ridicule of being seen as a 10%er at 1.3 and all the other numbers along the way. but, then, holding GST is a short term risk, too... as we've seen this month!

i enjoy the trading of some of my pot for short term gain and i'm patentely not the only one, as seen from the repeat bragging on here by 'some'. but, obviously, not knowing when or even 'if' approval will be gained (the sandbox refusal was a sobering lesson for all). but whatever happens, short term, it's not as if the sp then becomes untouchable, esp. if one accepts that there will be spikes and troughs and surprise rns' all the way to whatever target one has for the sp.

so, even getting it wrong, either way, doesn't stop one from investing, reinvesting or taking profits or accepting losses if something else comes along.

some basic 'stating the obvious' and some realism. and my own stance is to be more critical of any investments, barring blue chips and, even then, keeping a weather eye on them for suprises.

appreciated your response with no insults!

Anyone who can be bothered to look at the 12month chart will see that rises and falls in the sp allow you to increase your shareholding without investing more than the original investment.

if you want to just keep adding cash then that's fine. personally, i try to make the same money grow my volume. in spite of what the serial rampers (who, incidentally, hadn't even heard about the company before i'd been investing in it for a couple of years!) say, i'm betting that all the rampers have also traded this share but 'neglect' to mention those occasions as they know it'd get them labelled as '10%ers'.

bloody obvious to state, but if anyone here had sold even before the recent spike and bought back last week they'd hold 20% more shares than they did.

if you think being a '20%er' makes you an idiot then... duuuuur!

you do you and i'll do me... but anyone who throws insults merely beause someone has a different investing plan just shows their anger that someone else made a better decision, even if only temprarily.

and anyone who feels better about themselves by trying to take lumps out of another poster just their jealousy.

enjoy the sunshine..

We've been though my 'origin story' before so don't be a duck!

'surely' doesnt come into it, sadly. i suppose the 24 month contract folk are wary about as it, presumably, has clauses that could break it at any time. so we need manufacturing contracts that actually get fulfilled.

seem to have been a couple of previous contracts that were never spoken about after an initial order? there was a German one which i've mentioned previously where the total contract seem to disappear after the first delivery?

nomad don't seem interested in chasing up any TR1 which MUST be due, seeing as millions of shares have been dumped. and the company don't seem fussed so it's new contracts and the results (though they'd seem to be almost irrelevant if all the recent news is to be believed)/

will be thoroughly pished if the sp drops further, though, unless they keep the spread w i d e so it punishes the seller, not the buyer!)

Not really nonsense, is it. if you want to indicate which point is 'nonsense', then have at it. be interested to see where the focus is...

i suspect, though, any criticisms will either play the man or just throw a generalised insult and sidestep all the points made.

Not sure i like being applauded by this individual but i doubt anyone else is going to do owt else but pour scorn on it!

And, in spite of what negative criticisms of my post will no doubt generate, here they are:

expectations are very high that results will show significant positive revenue and profit. prople may say they have a timeline that stretches into 2030 but everyone who's been buying this year (including me!) are buying for a rise, either in expectations into the results or the results.

it's just very noticeable that, even with placings, there have been no ii TR1s nor BoD buys over the past year. There have been ample periods when, presumably, an order could have been filled, very obviously when Raphael sold off his stake. I doubt anyone can explain why not, other than saying 'they already have pots of cash, why would they want to make more?' you could make your own mind up about that logic.

most pi's here aren't holding umpteen millions of shares but, from the many, many posts written, it's obvious that the posters who purport to never trade but just endlessly buy also say they bought on the low so are at least double bagged at the moment. it's an evniable positon to be in, if true and , if true, even i would be happy to ramp away as my cushion of profit insulates me from any potential.

talk of stablecoin seems to just drift endlessly on never-ending 'news' that the world are all into stablecoins. so... is GST the only company pushing a stablecoin and waiting on FCA approval? (i actually don't have a comprehensive answer to that but... i doubt it).

will FCA EasySend approval come very soon? Will news arrive on Tuesday? more likely than stablecoin news. What will it do for the sp, when it does come? Spike, probably, as we've seen several times already. IS there any reason for them not approving it? doubt it...

Will a new acquisition send the sp higher? well, when Semnet proposal was rns'd it did, but the sp was trashed at the time. but it went from 0.7 > 1.5. where is it now? 1p. so, not quite the rerate that is constantly mentioned.

all rises and falls have to be in context to where they were. look at SAR and it triple bagged from a placing that murdered the sp at the time. it went from 55p (from a good average of 100p) down to 10p. it nows stands at 25p. does that make it a good buy now???

this sp has been at an average of 1p for years, now. so, is it due a major rerate 'imminently'? god knows. if the results show major revenue increase... but everyone keeps saying that the numbers are suspect so... cointoss.

what IS hilarious is how many times 'certain people' post how they made 20% in seconds somewhere else but still bang on about a share that's currently sliding. by my reckoning, said people have made 2million% in a couple of days on those alt. investments... so what's the big deal here?

it is, in the end, no more or less a nailed on guarantee than almost any other AIM share (and, before anyone bangs on about it being 'main market', has anyone ever paid stamp duty on their buy... EVER???)

And i just call the actual share price movements, so folk can try to take advantage.

(and does the last post mean i 'sold' again and now looking for a cheaper in!!!!!!

The sniping and personal attacks are tiresome.

just focus on the sp and the company... and accept that 0.93 might still be revisited. so might still get the chance for a better averaging down.