Member Info for katstrangler

The June '23 warrants were issued at 10p so they're not seeing the light of day anytime soon. and, unless htey've been rerated since (and i don't see any evidence of that) you'd have to go back before then to see. but find it hard to believe any warrants exist that would be profitable at 2p as the sp has never been lower, historically during placings/warrant issuance and they'd be dumb clucks if they were still holding warrants and converting them at this price?

i'll go back and check pre May '23, though, for my own personal satisfaction.

cheers for the post, though.

... but i'm not the one invested in EUA.

No, nor me. it was just an aside from announcing the full shares issue... which is a pre-requisite for takeovers also... but i did mention an emoji!

In that case, what's this nonsense about 'spooking' the board? is everyone going to jump ship because i said someone might want to buy us out?

sometimes.... 🤣

Perfidious????

you're actually suggesting that i'm being deceitful in posting a one liner?

because it carries the same weight as an rns???

give it a rest, chap. don't fall into the herd kicking mentality that, i'm presume, at least one person here insists on promoting.

(and you saying you wouldn't want a nice buyout to multiply your investment???)

No message... otherwise you can't just post a title.

(forgot the smiley emoji... unless it's not a joke and they're just waiting on FCA news) 😱😁

Nm

If an sp is falling then they'll try and get it lower, to get in. if it's rising then holders want it higher, while traders say they want it higher while selling.

meanwhile, the company are either sh** at public relations or brilliant and their plan is either going to grow the company into something major or it isn't.

unfortunately, the sp isn't a good barometer of progress, as companies milk investors for continuing funds until they'r e coining it in but holders trust that they're building to something very good.

the sp here has been as high as 3p and as low as 0.3p in that time. one would think, considering it regularly hits 1.4 that 0.97 is bloody cheap.

so that's what i'm waiting on...

everything else is just waffle (until the next rns!)

moving on...

Be nice to read something of note without unfiltering people... but i guess that just shows it's biitchy gibberish and backbiting!

can't wait for the next rns so people will actually have something else to focus on beside their tiresome vendetas.

Could just pull something out the bag that'll suprrise everyone and rerate this!

gla.

That's all i see frm the trash talk...

Would be unbelievable if they stuggle on that basis.

Plus, in the end, it's £100k revenue per month, though i don't know what the profit in that is, having gone throug an intermdiary. but i daresay we'll see more retail buys come along and, at some point, the seller(s) will run out of shares to sell. Hae to wait and see from the next podcast whether the funds they raised were just for this paint manufacture or for other contracts too. i daresay w'll get a very upbeat interview over the coming days so, now's the time to be adding as, beyond the spread, this feels about as cheap as it's going to get, considering it's the biggest contract they've announce for months.

and, yes, i see 10p as viable too so just waiting for another share to do something so i can move funds here.

pointless being angry at aim or other investors. it's AIM, ffs, and the reason we stick money in it is because you don't get multi bagging opps in main market. so, even if it takes 6months, as long as the sp slowly climbs and the mms stop diccking around with the spread, i'll be happy to hold for the longer term. so, lets see what happens later in the week.

This nonsense that is used to try and belittle posters is empty. first i'm told i bought for 10% at 0.97 by 'someone', then i get told i bought at 1.2 for10%.

all this deflection from your own disappointments over how the sp is performing is transparent.

but if it makes whoever feel better about their own holding policy, knock yourselves out! just means adding another name to the filter as it ontributes nowt but an attempt at a put down.

I added at 0.978... but i'm not afraid to speak as i find. and i think this, temporarily, hasn't worked. but it could come good tomorrow...

What am i saying:

placing price was very disappointing. everyone expected placing prices to go up, proving improvement in prospects. it either says that funders wanted very, very easy proits (that's been debated and only supposition if true) by forward selling i doubt they're holding as no TR!.

the current price suggests that good news might not be as soon as hoped or it's being worked (but it's a long con if that's the case. it's a mystery who's selling sub placing but on volume assume they're hedging their bets and still in profit from the low.

not seen a good reason for why shares need to be issued sooner. is it really so that that new owners can be given the opp o trade them? is that a legal requirement?

waiting on results is going to be a coin toss, without corroboration. not seen any pr that would prove growing interest by clients in using the services other than statement 'as expected'. twitter 'how to' and 'get in touch and we'll help' via twitter would prove interest. i bet less than 1% of holders know how to or would like to trade/hold crypto via GST. their sites aren't as 'friendly' as other neobanks.

in the end, 0.97 isn't very convincing. 1.4 would be. (and if anyone responds by posting Buffett quotes about 'buying when... 'I will look for you, i will find you...'

it really is moot which way this jumps on results. and, as they'll likely be released at 0700 you'll have to make your mind up beforehand and then hope to ride it, whichever way.

but it's true the pr doesn't nothing to show it actively promotingthe company (that i've seen). and i still say that @LSE_GST is a sh** twitter handle and proves they know nowt about pr.

Problem is, when did anyone ever believe this could ever be back below 1p!

even with a new acquisition (maybe), most holders would have assumed that the next raise would have been a good bit higher than the last, 1.1... certainly not lower, even if it was to guarantee easy funds. it WAS a bit sh** and wrong-footed everyone who said every asset was now printing money... if it's not an acquisition but merely to confirm a previous acquisition then everyone will look to the results and start wondering, regardless of what they will actually say.

Need to get over yourself, chap. you just sound angry because we didn't get the sp you wanted (to get out?).

traders have to buy before they sell and those buys propped up the sp when the sp looked miserable (at least, for the most part). getting angry on a bb doesn't do much for the situation unless you think you're going to shame traders to hold to make you feel better?

just chill out, ffs, before you bust a bloodvessel! 😊

(that said, the only time i've seen total shares volume being scrutinised is after a takeover offer! )

dispapointing lull after friday's trading frenzy (and that's another one i don't get: sellers below the placing price!).

guess we all find out whether this was a storm in a teacup or otherwise this week... either way, some side or other will be crowing!