Member Info for katstrangler

It's a shame that the company don't bang on about the future of GST on their own social media as much as it is here... (but maybe not on @LSEunderscoreGST, eh, of #GST!)

AHS, that will depend on where the bottom is!

Mid point to the road being sorted, i guess.

and, while i'm sure the vid of village roadworks being done is negligible regarding costs i don't know if they should keep drawing attention to it until they're properly on their feet?

cheap comment, possibly, but noted a few terse posts about 'sorting the investors first' comments in the past. sounds like Reform comments, myself!

if there's weakness in the sp this week could be a good opp if people missed the boat, the closer we get to completion.

(not really. just showing you how childish your prtests are... )

Ps. who mentioned EUA?

reported....

You're getting desperate in your attempts to punish me for buying on the dip.

show me one share i've promoted here... just one! dare you!

seriously, if you dislike my posts so much, just filter, as you sound just a little bit obsessed. at your core you're a decent chap, but you get just a little bit psychotic in your revenge issues.

So filter... and save yourself some boredom. noone forces you to read me posts, so why do it?

Just filter... everyone who doesn't like my posts, just filter.

that short enough for you?

Billy, if there was a vote in the air, why would BoD have let Raphael sell his share to the market instead of taking them at a 50% discount to their own holding? If votes are that precious, a bit stupid to let them disappear to retailers? Not as if they have no clue as to what might happen through the whole of '24!

as for short term, i'd draw your attention to the fact that the sp was 1.23 on 22 April, just before the 1.05 placing next day and 0.77 on Friday. so that's a 36% drop on... ?

you can get pished all you want but you can't argue with those numbers. (and i wouldn't have bought in if i didn't think that was likely the bottom so, therefore, with a greater likelihood of a recovery/bounce to come... but that still doesn't mean i'll not be prepared to sell down if it looks like there's a further drop possible).

everyone is free to filter posts that they think are ridiculous. but don't read them and then moan about the content. and the same goes for any posts from whoever is posting about QBT.

i'd say 'short term' is the way to go with a company so reluctant to promote itself between rns'!

'afternoon, all. bit disappointed by the lack of buying last week. guess with 4 weeks to go it'll only heat up towards end of June. looking for spare cash in case it dips further (unless the spread gets silly).

gives time for everyone to look elsewhere for a bit of short term profit...

I know all bout the russian documents... but it's ramping that has pushed up the price... hence you (and others) thinking it got overbought on ramping... sounds a bit like this bb, tbh.

and, i don't think it's important for there to be profit, except for the pi's who have endlessly been persuaded to buy into this share with talk of £millions, even at 0.2% charges and the rampy $36million contract'.

how many posts have we had that says every aspect of GST is profitable or 'ahead of expectations'? it's not me that expected it it's the bb and the hundres of new buyers who think 'dyor' means reading these posts.

you're the only poster of note that has made such valid but 'negative' points, on the basis that it's irrelevant in the short term. i'd say that 'short term', if it moves the sp 40% one way or the other, is more signficant that looking at being a holder long term. trading the highs and lows will give you multibagging, if timed right and, if you have a free carry, can take advantage of that long term hope.

but you're one of very few who give an honest appraisal of what the results might give. i suspect you're right, ultimately, but i'll reserve judgement on what i do depending on how the sp performs up to it.

i doubt i'll post my 'concerns' as we run up to the results so i can take advantage of their full-on optimism in spreading the good GST news.

i have my shares now so obviously want the sp to get back to pre placing, or better. if ther's news comes through that boosts the sp then all the better.

First, you owe the bb about a thousand apologies for your conduct but you're not man enough to do so... same goes for the persistent repeats bullies on this site.

second, you've been in this share for, what... six months? been in this for years, on and off, so i've held this for about 6 x longer than your first buy... and, i would add, my first buy was on 21March, 2021, at 2.3625. so i don't need any lessons from you about being 'long term'.

and, if you need any reminding, you were in healthy profit at 1.45 and was buying at all the prices on the slide. same with your friendly 'axis of evil' rampers, although i suspect, more and more, they hold less than they say and are just as guilty of selling when panicked. between you you should buy all of Garies' shares as you endleslly brag about your holdings!

i reckon i'm up on all of you atm, so perfectly content with swimming against your current.

and, ftr, i posted my buys on ENSI over the past week or two... (so i obviously think the sp will go higher into results...). so your 'i reckon' posts can hold some clearer info!

good weekend, all.

have a good weekend.

Bfd, i know you restate that profit isn't essential in results but, but, but, the market (and certainly pi's, of which, already said, nearly hafl of the isued shares are now held in retail) are like lemmings... it doesn't take much for them to panic, in much the same way the herd pile in on nothing news (pretty much as EUA or all the shares that do 100% just on ramping), daily.

if sentiment has been that the company has been coining it on charges on crypto trading (and there have been lots of numbers chucked about on here as to the daily numbers) plus Semnet and thier now legendary contract! it'd be a blow if there's not better than expected revenue.

if the revenue posted in negligible then your 'it's not about profit or revenue because we're still building' becomes just a fall back position for holding. but traders will judge which direction the sp will move and buy or sell on that.

we've seen the sp fall by near 40% from day before last placing so, patently, being a 'start up' doesn't matter where the sp is concerned, nor the longer term future.

frankly, i haven't seen a good case for being lth here, as the BoDs 2p average might attest to? but i guess tat depends on how 'long term' you think long term is and what appetite one has for trading it.

Why on earth would 'explanations' from a bb of similarly-informed pi's be the validity for taking investment decisions.

and it's not about what he held... it's about what he holds, which is now less than Bai.

And if we got some information about our hallowed 'Lord' and any purchases he's made (and, if not, why not... the company isn't ALWAYS in closed periods!) then i would say that interested parties would outweigh even a 10% stake in the share... also, if the BoD were disntinterested to take up Raphael's shares in ANY capacity, then i would have though that any voting circumstance isn't in the near term future... hence all those shares now being in retailer hands!

there ARE times when even a disliked poster makes good points.

instead of just attacking, just read the points made and accept that they're as valid as... say, me saying that 0.82 was coming!

Here you go, idiot!

https://www.gstechnologies.co.uk/investor-relations

The only argument i can see for BoD not taking hi shares (if, indeed it IS him selling... i still say it's more likely PI's as, from what i can see, nominees account for over 50% of shares) is closed periods but, as he would be conintinually in discussion with them, i find it hard to believe there haven't been opportunities for them to buy, if they'd wished.

still say it's pi's being swayed by lack of info about the 'maybe' acquisition. but that would be halted pretty promptly IF there is an acquisiton in the pipe, rather than just 'progressing' GSMoney.

otherwise, it's going to take some enthusiasm that revenue and profits are going to be better than a 0.8p sp deserves.

personally, i'm astonished at the lack of information about Pathways and what, exactly, has been happening. find it hard to believe that there's an 'omerta' on developments in that area. the concern is always that silence is preferred rather than enforced and that leads to suspicions that things aren't going to plan.

is it really impossible to make some enthusiastic comments about the months an monts of that relationship?

First, no idea why anyone would be interested in how much anyone buys in a share with billions, unless they buy billions!

but, knowing all the bs and insults that come my way from 'certain parties' i thought i'd play a game... so seeded my buys on another bb.

won't be doing it again but just to shut up the tiresome trolling from certain individuals who never contribute anything except insults.

and, with that, i'll say you should really all be looking at the wider picture as to why no TR1s and why BoD don't feel inclined to be buying off each other when someone decides to sell out?

not a problem in the short term but over a longer period, it's a big question mark!

The 'attitude reflected pretty accurately the sp for the whole of today.

(and, while i still have concerns about who the seller might be i got more than 500k on the turn). so much for £200, eh!

...beforethe bargain price becomes expensive again!

And my 172711, just now