Member Info for katstrangler

The NT to sell might mean there's a big seller in the background and they want the buys to take them up first... OR it's due a rise.

Are you sure that 0.8 isn't now a buy price?

Everyone seems to be waiting for someone else to buy first and need to see the sp rise before jumping in!

still seems to be a lack of conviction in the future atm... or maybe folk really need that proof first and are happier paying a premium to current sp, on the basis that anything cheaper than historical 20p would still be cheap?

don't get it myself but having bought my own average down from a nosebleed price down to 10.75 i guess i'll have to wait for that news before i get into the blue.

so, another 3 or 4 weeks for something positive to drop!

Suthy, if they're big enough they'll be delayed buys, as with previous days. but, as i said, hasn't stopped the drop.

Won't be surprised to see big buys at eod saoking up these 0.8 shares but we've seen that several times already and doesn't put a brake on the slow dip.

only positive is that a nice rns will have everyone wanting in, regardless of the quality of the news so folk will enjoy a nice spike... how high and from what low is the question!

You can challenge all you want.

i said i thought the sp would fall and i said the 'maybe' acquisition was a rubbish statement, regardless of it working in the past. i also said that absence of approval for stablecoin was not near term , in spite of all the guff about tories 'going to rush crypto through before elections' and easysend is still not paid for so not a thing yet.

the relentless banging on about acquisitions which, when all's send and done, are not well known and there'fore ver cheap to pick up, may well be canny but just haven't added much value, in spite of all the posts to the contrary.

either keep headscratching as to why the sp is where it is and roll with it or just keep justifying why your sp is possibly higher than today's price and make a decision to either buy or hold.

but i'm happy with my treatment of the share so happy to have been out for a while.

even buying back is only because i'll be in cheaper, rather than expecting news. personally, in two minds as to whether it's worth it before results and, even then, whether buying before will be a good move.

each to their own, though, eh!

Not here to fight... nor argue why anyone should buy or sell.

i said i thought 0.82 would be reached. i'm surprised to see it go lower but it is what it is. i'll probably buy if it hits upper 0.7s but only because it's cheaper, not because it's worth more. that's for the market and for the next rns to decide.

It was the sentiment on outlook. and we know that can be manipulated.

everyone has to decide if the manipulation is pulling the price down OR was the manipulation the endless ramping that pushed the price up!

and the sentiment just isn't helped by a company that doesn't know how to tell its own story. their pr is horribly absent and ii's are absent too.

no point saying that ii's WILL be interested. there's no interest, nor has been, for years. and, without stablecoin approval (and same with Easysend) not looking like it's close.

or, at least until there's some news to look to.

But the company's outlook is represented by the share price.

sentiment is what you're buying, more than factual. if you can't see that then you'll find yourself holding a share with a price differential to that sentiment... and, i'm afraid, without proof to say otherwise, probably sub 0.8.

Would be better with a new contract to underscore the 2024 revival... all eyes on it and waiting.

What are you going to do, start a file on him and report him for 'deliberately' dropping the sp!

first, you've no idea that he's a seller. just suppostion. also, if this is such a cast iron guaranteed multibagger, why on earth is he selling? i get it, looking for reasons for the drop but without a TR1 it's just guesswork.

i'd suggest looking at the top heavy retail holdings and them being frightened by the drop.

either way, whoever the seller is, unless they're going to stop...

Saw the new video. one thing that i wondered about: the road sits higher than the surround terrain so, as the road looks like impacted hardcore and gravel, what stops erosion on the side, what with it being higher, as there's obviously no kerb, as such.

what if vehicles need to get off the road? how do the edges cope with that, for, for example, vehicles needing to turn around/get back on the road in the opposite direction? won't it be prone to erosion?

If it gets back to the 120s i'd have thought that'd be a bit late to be reducing!

fair to say that noone saw this happening. check the volumes and both today na dy'day were not insignificant. i attribute that to buying on the drop so have to see tomorrow and next week where this settles but, fair to say a lot of folk are now a bit jittery about where support is. only point in holding is that good news is 'just over the hill'. and, when all is said and done, the drop isn't calamitous... just a surprise that 165 is disappearing into the distance.

AHS, you post waaaaay more than i do here, so... who's attention seeking minute by minute, considering you say you don't trade it and are only in this for the endgame that will take years, according to you?

Nm

Possibly, but a plonker that got out a couple of weeks back and is still waiting for that further acquisition to see if it's worth getting back in!

Personally, i just see #GST as another company, no better nor worse than any others... not charlatans but have no skills in marketing, pr, social media or offering more than the basic info, presumably because they have their goal and they see pi's as peripheral to them.

but with so much of their shares in retail hands, i find it disconcerting that they aren't aware of a commitment to cultivating a better public image in either promoting their products or giving sufficient info and timely updates to keep retailers content.

the fact they produce 'maybe' rns' and think that doesn't matter so that retailers have to guess for themselves what it really means is a bit....

like i said, i don't think they're fussed about the daily price as their job is to bring it home, however long it takes. but it doesn't make for a comfortable ride for the pi passengers on that trip, putting up their own cash to particiapte in that journey!

A one year contract at $36mill as opposed to a 10 year contract with annual £3.6mill (which is more in keeping with the last results, frankly, which, earned $0.2mill profit) and taking a 66% stake for... was it $1.8mill?

and you see no difference in those two possibles?

and you're investing on that???

It's the equivalent of the tories saying labour will cost families '£2000... '

omitting facts would seem to me to be obsuring the details on purpose.

Not calling anyone a liar... just looking for clarification so the rns is clearly understood.

is it a lie to ask over what period that contract covers?

is it?