Member Info for katstrangler

Here's a question (and not a trick one): if the running total is always approx. £/$ 1million how much of that running total is new trades, added, as opposed to the existing trades from the 23hours before?

as the counter never resets to zero, is a running total going to merely be a top up of what's dropped off from the 25hour, so 1/24 of that total, rather than being 24/24ths as keeps being promoted here as in 'we make a million per day'.

or does that 1/24 match the 1million every 24hours?

The vicar of dabbling has spoken. yes, you can smell the desparation as the HNWIs start buying in, in £300 lots!

i'm fine with a smaller holding until something shakes out... i'm certainly not twitchy about joining those HNWIs just yet!

Nicely summed up, Billy. and puts paid toBfd's nonsense about how 'this is how acquisitions are done'.

again, though, the $36mill contract sticks out like a sore thumb in being 7 x the total revenue for the previous year and for not having any other contracts or follow up info to qualify it. you can argue that 'that's not done' but you have to deliberately ignore the 'uniqueness' of that one contract and how it 'luckily' skews perception for Semnet's value. it would seem that the only time any real info is going to be issued will be when the IPO proposal is released. but, atm... not having over-invested in this, i'm happy to be more cynical about how that contract materialsied and why.... and why it hasn't been duplicated since.

It also has a future impact on the NASDAQ IPO as it'll be the historical value placed on the shares in the UK so will have an influence on how many shares will be issued in the IPO. that's why there's confusion between the disparity at what's looking like a price that is near twice as cheap as it was in April and is also at variance with the oft-mentioned $36mill contract (which, incidentally, stands in isolation... as no new contracts have been won/mentioned since March!)

The shares can be loced in for a year or two, if they needed guarantees but don't say vwaps the are way things are done... that's usually the mechnaism for clns and they're usually triggered by the cln holder, not the company.

Absolutely wrong! this not 'how these things are done'! they could have just very easily completed the deal there and then at a fixed price of 1.05p. now, the sp is 0.71. are they going to wait for a placing so the price will be lower or higher? why initiiate a gamble on the issuing price? and why don't you get that the price isn't 'fixed'??? would you rather have your shares at 2p or 0.7p? or 0.55? stop trying to make this sound straightforward... it's put an element of risk in the number of shares to be printed and that, atm, has consequences, potentially, for the sp for any shares issued to conclude Easysend and, on a much smaller transaction, Bonfirepay (if that was ever a real thing!).

you talk absolute horse doo doo sometimes, in pretending all things are just sorted. they aint...

If all of that is true then why not issue the shares at the placing price from April, instead of punting a gamble that it's going to be on a vwap average? didn't make sense then... doesn't make sense now. that said, of course the company can influence the sp. updates, news, pr... been said before.

again, ask yourself who controls the sp for the Semnet conclusion? the company... they could've close that deal months ago but didn't. punt an answer as to why not?

Punting a guess that's a comment about me? notice noone wants to discuss the issuance of new shares and what price Easysend and Semnet might want them at, while pumping the idea of 'biiiig money' coming in?

i suspect NASDAQ will be of more interest to them, rather than GST. but i can also see someone will punt the idea that, ultimately, GST will want to moe itself to NASDAQ platform too (the OTC thing is pretty much useless in every case where a UK micro cap trumpets such a move).

Where are the shares going to come from for HNWIs or ii's to get involved? more to the point, why haven't they yet at cheaper prices? or will the new shares be issued at a discount to bring them onboard?

or are you expecting the Semnet/Easysend shares to be offloaded?

regardless, you're adding more shares to the list of shares that'd be required in the placing, unless they're all going to be Wellesley-sized big spenders!

will be good for everyone if it's a premium plcing but... why would Semnet/Easysend agree to their shareholding being reduced?

Even if interims are as glowing as you hope for, I wouldn't be wanting my shares before a good rns. i'd be wanting the maximum amount.

'adjusting your position' presumably means selling when the share doesn't look to be meeting its statements? that's called trading... i don't see how you manage your expectations of a company if all it means is you trash talk critics and just keep self-persuading that, whatever price you bought in at, it was the right call... sounds more like hope thatyou understand what limited (after all, pr's can only ever have a limited understanding of what's going on) information is uncovered.

the group spent two years talking about Sandbox and then, suddenly, it's 'irrelevant'... talk was of squeezing stablecoin acceptance into the tory's dying gasp as a government and then it isn't... what was an unheard of cyber company suddenly becomes an entry into NASDAQ fortunes but with mystery valuations... the very idea that anyone can get a serious valuation on any company is for the birds.

even now, the interims are hoped to be a great rerate chance for the sp but, remember, it'll need to bag just to get back to previous good levels on optimsim, never mind news!

you equate circumspection about the news on offer as trolling because you've possibly overstaked your cash. your choice... but don't call out any calls or pulling on threads as being 'nefarious'. expressing an opinion is just the same as calling out that it might 'heads' as opposed to your 'tails'. all of our investing, outside or decent blue chips, are just v risky gambles, in spite of convictions so don't bother tarnishing 'other opinions' as being malign as i could easily say anyone who thought they might hold some value might save money by not buying on the recent spikes?

just accept that these bbs aren't meant to be fanclubs but exchanges of opinions and info.

All of the silence just makes me believe he's using this time to set up the assets to be stolen and he's using CRTM funds and investors to do all the homework so it'll be up and running immediately it gets 'transferred'. can't see any other explanaton why he hasn't felt the need to add anything more... he's given up any pretence of working for current investors, unless they've got access to whatever comes next, also. almost makes you wonder if those insiders have also ben tipped as to what's going to happen to keep them quiet... if any truth in that then can only hope he stitches them up too.

Well, if the price slides below 0.7 i'll certainly be asking why noone's buying yet! been targeted endlessly for being a critic of the nonsense rampers, as opposed to the informed posters to add content. and if you can't answer the reason and deal, literally deal, with that...

Amazed at how rampy and joyous the posts are over the weekend when it's a club for pub optimism about where this is or should be ad then just how quiet it goes when the markets open and the trading volume reverts back to nominal sums.

frustrating but you have to contend with it and explain to yourself why... and what it does and doesn't say. not saying it's a bad thing as it's obvious noone particularly wants to sell at this price. but, also, noone particularly wants to buy.

looks like everyone has committed as much as they want and waiting on a trigger for anything more.

gla.

Someone risks a few dollars to fix his flaccid tool and then gets aggresive online and wants to blame someone else for his non-function. i wouldn't take much notice of it... it's been pretty much stated that its success is a bit arbitrary but it won't stop sales. i seriously doubt the milestone would have been paid for, if you excuse the pun, a flop!

... and i comment on this share because i know it well. i might not dig around into the background the way some do here (and i've applauded the few often) but none of it has done the sp any good, has it?

it might well be that the share will never see 0.7 again, after the interims but there's always going to be chances with it, all the way up to the most optimistic price folk here keep talking about.

Put most of mine into CABP... not on the leaderboard. but looking to see what rns' are released. not hard to understand.

Nothing bitter about my comment. just an observation about the trades in the first hour. you all need to accept that making a comment about the current state of the sp isn't a dig at you and your finances, nor your peowess at investing but making the point that an awful lot of people spent their weekend posting about this share but which hasn't yet translated into actions. if you're going to buy million more share, Rabbit, ten i wish you good fortune with it.

Having read this weekend's posts, it looked like i was expecting a tsunami of knowing buyers to 'get in' on the ground floor but... not seeing it?

really feels like everyone wants to encourage everyone else to buy more shares but aren't so keen to do so themselves? but the only real way to see the price rise (outside of news) is to see new money coming in, like we see when traders come in and then get out!

doubt the detective work seen here is sufficient to counter the fact that the company don't see fit to make statements, even if it's on their social media, to highlight these discoveries.

maybe it'll grow into the day or week... gla.

no, it wasn't the icing on the cake! this bb has raved about stablecoin for over 2 years now. the number of posts about how they get a uk licence and the endless 'research' into boe statements has been clogging up the bb forever.

sufficed to say, holders here, with a red mark on their holding, are constantly looking for a hint about where the company is going to prove to themselves that their investment is sound. literally, daily posts from people who purport to being happy to hold into 2030 and yet still post hourly, even if it's just to **** someone off! at least my own stance is looking at the trades to see direction of travel for daily opportunities.

if everyone is so convinced and, as things come from leftield that noone guessed, no idea why everyone keeps goading each other into constant top ups, except to hope others keep the sp buoyant!

like i said, if you're that convninced that you plan to hold until 2030, what's you insecurity that you need to investigate the minutaie instead o trusting the bod, as everyone says they do!

enough from me until tonight. i look forward to reading what those wearing deerstalkers discover today!

gla.

Once again, we see people digging around for clues... clues that most investors would think should have been stated by the BoD already. all the way down the line we've been reading posts about 'trusting the BoD', 'they know what they're doing' and 'they'll inform us when they want to'... hence the 'this isn't a leaky ship' and 'they're playing their cards close to their chests'.

the truth of it is the company don't issue news outside of the most obvious statements. but, even then, there's no updates on DSS, on FCA, Bonfirepay, Easysend, Semnet share price issueance... in the past couple of days i've now read that the DSS now isn't relevant, they're moving to other areas of the world for stablecoin, cyber is the new direction, Easysend is an irrelevance, etc.

the fact is, the company plays their own game and the largest shareholders are left guessing what's actually happening.

while i applaud the endeavours, you seem to be constantly making up a future with 'news' that merely froths you up without any direction from the company. the fact that Semnet is now the big news isn't anything like what anyone expected and i wouldn't be surprised to see all the 'research; being red herrings as the company just don't want to tell you what's happening in a way that should satisfy retailers.

so, still applies, trade the sentiment as actual news rarely benefits the holders in a rerating.