Member Info for katstrangler

What, like 'I still think 10p this year!'?

looking at your posts, you never post any information, positive or negative, about a holding, just vague cheerleading. now if anyone is looking for likes... it's a hard fight to post criticism of a company, because noone in it wants to hear they might have called it wrong... no likes in that!

still, maybe you'll get your 10p... as long as it's not from a 10:1 consolidation... in which case...

100p, here we come!

Massive, that's kind of what i'm saying on the 50/50... so, for the first time in a long while, we're in agreement.

Ian, what i said was, as we don't have all the answers, the only redeeming feature of the sp atm is, if you buy now then you're pretty much buying 'buy one, get one free' from the 1.9 placing and even 10% discount on the big placing that undercut the sp, at 1.20. so, that's better... and in many cases, much better than the averages holders have (except for the one that keep telling us they bought the cln=trashed sp).

and, the lower you buy, the better. but folk here have been saying that SINCE the 1.9p placing... so, 50/50 is about as good as it gets, on the understanding that, if you get in at this price, you'll lose less on bad news and be well in profit before a lot of the lthers.

Dingle, when you can say something better than 'bought 450k at 1.40' then i'll take your advice.

Not saying it won't mutlibag on news, just saying that there are so many holes in the info as to make it 50/50 as to whether it does... and all THAT means is there will be many who will try and buy at 0800 and hop onboard for the ride... instead of holding on for six months and having to wait for 2p to be hit first, before getting into profit!

doesn't matter if you plan to hold this for the long term... except you can expect more of the same lack of details in the future.

still, 3p coming, eh!

Qu. if the rns has a spelling mistake, why didn't they issue a correction? if there are 'non-compete' and 'non-complete' possibles, is it really a mistake? many rns' are corrected with a second rns restatement.

qu. why are people still talking about churn of placing shares? why would £2million's worth of shares be traded below the placing price? are these HNWIs who took them so stupid/amateur that they're panic selling?

obviously, the world and its investor wife can't all bale at the same time but it would seem to me that a lot of folk who hold sp averages are hedging their bets and taking some profit, just in case. i don't see any other likely explanation, on the basis that noone particularly likes to sell at a loss, significant or otherwise.

it's issues like the Nov 'legally binding agreement' to buy Metapay, with no clues as to how long regulatory approvals will take.

Same with Treasury... when is 'time to time' and, if they haven't bought any (aside from the 1, which i could buy!) what was the point of dropping the rns, as it doesn't require an EGM?

The Semnet arbitration... is it a spelling mistake or not? if it isn't, what does 'non-complete' mean. if it's the other, why not correct it? assumption is because they rns'd it had completed, it must be the other but, is it? are they forward selling their consideration shares??? otherwise, the valuation... as it's only valued at $36million on IPO, is there a possibility that the IPO won't happen/is delayed because of this arbitration?

the integration... what does it actually do for the company that it merited a rocket emoji? is it just backend savings or is is something that generates more clients/revenue? a rocket on its own says... nothing. you can guess but it says nothing specific.

comes down to the overall problem... everyone is punting their own pov, and there's no real clues to hold onto as the this rns will still only give us updates to 4 months ago. so, what will the forward guidance be? is it going to be 'things are progressing' and 'we expect' wallpapered over everything, hiding specifics? too many 'i think it means' which means we don't know.

just not a great position to be in when confidence is undermined by lack of detail (that's what 'trolling; is, pointing out lack of info, not shouting 'we're doomed'... unless doom is what the lack of info provides).

so, once again, it becomes a cointoss, with the weight of decision making put onto the shoulders of investors... who have to 'believe' or else they're at fault for misconstruing the info out there.

(and yes, back from an overnight).

AHS, just off to the hospital in the next 10mins so... shut YOUR mouth and acknowledge that, for a lth, you're here an awful lot, daily, hourly, minutely (your sensitivity and humanity). you're a miserable excuse for a human being, lashing out at everyone who isn't you!

and with that, off to the races/hospital. hope you choke on your guilt...

Because the buying is drying up... also, what difference does that make, if you're buying? unless you're looking to sell in the next 30mins (which, considering this share is now 11% cheaper than the placing, which was cheaper than the then current price and cheaper than the 1.9 previous placing... )?

the concern now is always having cheaper buys means earlier sells if things don't look remarkable... which means downward pressure. so, the results better give these new buyers a 200% rise or we get spiked again.

Correct, Pat. hide the big sell amongst the buys later on... but, yes, not both sells.

...1.123ish...

Massive, my last buy was on the last drop from 1.20... at 1.23ish... i won't be buying more in this as i just don't know what the results will be... but i've already punted my fear of 0.8 if not as bullish as rampers say.

Those are delayed sells from this morning... otherwise, where are all the shares coming from! good grief...

You can fight it out among yourselves.

just pointing out that the rampers call it wrong as much as 'trolls' but think, because they say the sp will rise, that makes them better at judging the company's situation. but then the fallback is always... 'i'm in this for the longer term'!

the company is possibly a great call to buy... but it was far too early to invest in without trading it and selling for profits, whatever the outcome was... listening to the rampers is always fatal as they probably sell while ramping it. you can argue the same for trolling.

what is horrible about this company is, with so many assets, they just refuse to give ongoing evaluations or breadcrumbs/indicators about sales growth, true numbers, developments, sector comments, press peices, podcasts, interviews. if they don't feel they can speak well enough to promote the company they should get someone who can... but they don't. even when they bring in an english speaking director.

and that is all... i'll leave it to the usual sheriffs to lord it over the bb and just hope they'll be smug when the results come through.

good luck, all.

RR is down 30p on a £10 price, so 0.5%... but it's up 130% over a year and 1000% over 5... so, Billy, is that meant to explain the drop here? is that any comparison to GST?

holders here only WISH their daily drops were 0.5%.

No, it doesn't. usually, when a share has been hit by a falling sp, you get a recovery before the results, esp. if the general opinon is that it has been oversold (usually due to a repeat/distressed seller). Then you get the 'sell into news'... shares only fall into results,, especially after two placings as higher levels, if there's concerns about what the results will be.

if they're good you'll get the day traders jumping in for quick profit. but, USUALLY, there's a ramp crew buying shares beforehand... this isn't happening... or it hasn't happened yet... or it's countered with sells to match.

so your observation is faulty and... just... wrong!

Massive, you're floundering. of course the sp 'could' rise over 3.6... but then, Buffett 'could' have bought shares, santander 'could' put in an offer to buy it for a squillion pounds and GST 'could' give investors the information they need to validate their hopes... but not likely.

EVERYONE wants the sp higher but it hasn't been going in that direction... if you can't explain, better than 'it's the stock market, innit' then you're as clueless as everyone else and you don't honestly know if the next level will be 3.6 or 0.8...

sadly, neither do any of us, as the BoD don't give clues. And you, Massive, and AHS, are as clueless as the rest, for all the 'deep dive' rummaging for the news that the BoD should be giving.

GENIUS answer... 'it's the stock market'! you know nothing more than anyone else... Massive by name, eh! you're no more a troll than anyone else... except the 'trolling' on here is at least asking questions that need answering (even if the BoD will ignore them all).

You haven't an answer, have you, Massive. you spend all day, every day, saying 'Massi knows' but you know nowt.

you were lucky enough to discover this after a disasrous cln and saw it bounce when it ended. you've been addeing at higher prices ever since (remember all those '807' smug buys?) so i doubt your average is any better than anyone elses.

AND you still can't explain how or why the sp is where it is after several placings.

probably the same for AHS...

the only ramper who seems to have made on this is splatted... and i only base that on the fact he stopped posting...

Lets be kind to Massive: explain why the sp didn't bounce on the 1.9 placing, why there's been no update to the Treasury, considering they also raised at 1.2 and is now at... (just checking) 1.0825?

MAssive, just explain the drop from 3.6 to... 1.055, with a 1.9p and 1.2 placings. go on, give it a go instead of changing the subject.