RE: Too undervalued for a bid?12 Jun 2022 23:54
There's no point selling. There's no gain for him in taking it private. Company grew 38% last year, forecasted to grow 25% going forward, enough liquidity to last for years at current burn rate, but given they're also forecasting cash neutral coming year, and cash generative after that, there's seemingly no liquidity concerns - which is the only reason one would ever be in a hurry to sell.
So why would they sell just at the point that the stock is transiently weak, in the most verifiably fearful market on record (some indicators are showing negative sentiment beyond the levels we saw in 2008)? Why, in essense, sell at the lowest ebb, when you have a company that's seemingly indifferent to the macro. It's still growing. It's beating IPO projections. It's growing in a market full of headwinds - and it'll be gaining market share from competitors who struggle in it.
There's this vibe of desperation from certain short term traders that seems entirely projection - they NEED a buyout to flip a quick profit. They NEED it to happen to keep faith in their holding, as if a buyout is the only way this will ever be valued more favourably. But Moulding doesn't NEED it. Investors with patience beyond a few months don't NEED it. Eventually the substantive size of the company will justify the loftier valuations. It won't be a bear market forever, and it won't be floating below 1x revenues forever. But even if they do, revenues are doubling every 3 years. All Moulding, and the institutions that have built positions here, have to do is sit on their hands and focus on the company moving forward, which is all I've hitherto seen management do. Happy to hold, indifferent to takeover talks. If it happens, so be it, we'll all be bought out on the cheap for probably something presumably higher than this, so no-one can complain, but it would be a huge, disappointing opportunity cost. I believe it's vanishingly unlikely that it gets bought, and almost as unlikely anyone is in a hurry to take it back private. Jeff Bezos didn't take amazon back private in '01 when it dropped from ~$110 to $6. He rode it back up to nearly $4000. Mike Ashley didn't take Sports Direct back private when it dropped from a 300p at IPO down to 32p in '08. He rode it back up over 900p. I'm not saying THG is the next Amazon, but there's no reason it can't be the next Sports Direct. It's grown to be a sizeable company as is, but has got even greater potential and if it realizes any of it, the share price will be many multiples of this recently beaten down valuation.