Ryan Mee, CEO of Fulcrum Metals, reviews FY23 and progress on the Gold Tailings Hub in Canada. Watch the video here.
It's an improvement on the last article posted , that was 16 years old. Although at a cursery glance this relates to recommendations made in 2001 and a report written between 2015 and 2017. Riveting stuff.
Finance deal please.
I can buy into that theory, although there would always have been speculation about cashflow. Some not well considered timelines perhaps initially , then a six month audit followed by the possibility of 100 % guarentee, perhaps became the new deal to chase after Searose was confirmed, who knows 🤷♂️
One thing Id certain, I'm sure they want it over the line just as much as we do.
#Wellmostofusdo
I'm not pointing the finger at Arun either now or after news re Finance breaks. I press the button to execute trades of my own free will. Nothing anyone posts influences me to do so.
Although some have done what I hope works out to my benefit and worked tirelessly to instil fear, which has enabled me to load up at what I consider bargain bucket basement prices.
W agree with your 12.56 post.
All I'm interested in right now is a financial package , everything else irrelevant until that is achieved.
This appears to be on behalf of H&W for accountancy services.
Perhaps connected with UKEF , see date 8/1.
Harl have their own accountants , possible that one of the steps in the process is verification of numbers by a third party. Could be totally wrong .
Forwarded from Kaeren Hutton (https://www.linkedin.com/in/ACoAACRlGPEBRcYPoIeO0R6FBhm6u3EW6WI9XEE):
https://www.tendersontime.com/tenders-details/dfe---finance-division---harland-and-wolff-provision-external-financial-services-5907241/#
No I didn't miss the point at all Broomtree.
Yes if you bid and dont succeed it is technically a fail. However if the company involved decides to go it alone, reject levelling up funding and utilise a private loan, that needs clarifying in relation to your post.
Harl didn't fail because a competitor trumped them. It is isn't dressing anything up , merely stating facts .
Perhaps for some perspective on dissolved companies , look at failure rate of start ups in year one to five. Approx 85 to 90 % fail. Nothing exciting or worthy of reporting looking at dissolved companies on Company's House.
IMO
I meant to add , that I've mentioned previously that I think that the no follow thru on numerous mou' etc is finance related and I expect to hear substantially more on various projects after the financing is announced. I don't expect to hear exactly what the cashflow runway is, If I was Ceo / CFO I'd hold that card tight. You pay your money , you take a chance or alternatively you sell and sit on the sidelines.. or sell and post regardless :)
Broomtree , you know that Lottie has you blocked , yet you continue to address posts to her.
Without doubt BT , Lotties post is a contributory factor that merits consideration.
Point 1 ) yes to date they have 'failed" to secure finance . However I personally believe the delays have in the main been caused by the process of application, soon we will find out if it was worth the wait.
2. Further appeal IM.
The company won the first appeal in the High Court and most certainly did nothing to encourage the further appeal.
3. Failure to win Scilly contract.
It wasn't a failure. The IOSSG decided to not avail of the levelling up funding and raise privately to ensure their continued monopoly. This cannot he considered a failure by Harl.
With regards to advocating loading up , you were quick to report selling to the board.
For transparency, I continue to hold. I'm confident funding news incoming.