The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
Smileywiley and beegbear, you started to hunderstand to analyze the right way : you started to compare their RNS to look at their financial reports that's very important but if you add some events and actors you will find that is an organize scam with you and Guinea gouvernement as a victims. Yoda!
Price : they want long-term investors out and traders in. 😂 😂 😂
AllNothing you remember that I tell you that the ownership of CS change to Hudson maybe not only the but also the bank account with 20M balance. That may be the clue. Yoda
If my memory is good enough Julian was appointed by the famous Hudson. And still acting after resignation. Yoda
I told you that Hudson is nothing more than a empty shell company.
To know how really the working capital was use all this time, look at the BOD remunerations and some unrealistic expenditures. In the formers and year today financial reports. Yoda!
@smileywiley Hudson can't make any dilution because of Guinea Mining code they're doing that before without having a right to do. But now Guinea government is following them. Is stipulate that any major change in shareholding exceeded 5% have to be approved by the government.
Because Hudson is nothing just a shell company to cover the CS labyrinth. What is strange the share older change from CS to Hudson when investigations start against Sam Pa in China. Yoda
Smile. Simon will not give you any explanation if he doesn't want to say that all-time they were lying to you. Just re-read my previous thoughts. Yoda!
Bigbear2 you are dreaming but the best dream is the one that you make when you are awake. I don't think that you are awake. Yoda!
I don't think that anybody is a thick here but finally I started to think that you're the only one thick. I told you that they have the liability greater than the asset. What explanation you want after that? Yoda!
EyGuiy I am not making a theory. I just answered your question by the fact. Up to you to have your own opinion. I not the one who mentioned the insolvency. Go back to the people who released the RNS and ask them why the insolvency was an option? You have to remember that the actually ceo was designated by Hudson. And the polemic between BOD and major shareholder can be negotiate without insolvency as option.
I told you already that Konta port was not their asset and tell you that locally they have more liabilitie than assets. That the answer if not why they mentioned insolvency? Yoda
EyGuiy the first 15% of the actually share of Hudson was owned by Cif (China international fund) without any deal and becomes CS (China sonangol) the only big deal was when CS bought up to 50 M shares from nik zuks and CS rich some things like 32% and rest was loans convertible to share with dilution effect. And in Novemb 2015 when Sam Pa was catch up by Chinese gov. The share was transferred to shell company called Hudson.
The fact that Julian was in Conakry from last Sunday 04 to 06 is knownis not secret. He went back with with a big NO concerning Konta. Yoda!
You and the Guinean government are the Dinom of the Farce in this story. Yoda!
That is because the Guinea Mine Minister sent a letter to Rio Tinto on September 10, threatening to unilaterally withdraw the permit from Rio. Tinto. https://www.jeuneafrique.com/mag/644601/economie/guinee-lultimatum-du-ministre-des-mines-au-groupe-rio-tinto-sur-le-gisement-de-simandou/?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium = JAEco & utm_campaign = & PostFBJAEco_18102018 fbclid = IwAR1bboBrpj13JO9xWJqNd9DY2aEpKyvGR__wUUhjf6OcSjl9K-kph50E3ck
Sparkygg: It would be reasonable for investors to sue bellzone for breach of trust, disclosure of misleading information manipulation of financial statements .... But who will be liable to justice individually or collectively? Is it bellzone, cif, bell and potenger, nik zuks, Terry larkan, Julian, ...?
Let me tell you that bellzone is the western type of syndicate like queensway 88. Instead of using the same address for all companies and shell companies, bellzone is using the same company name in differents administrations around the world (Guinea, Australia, Singapore, Germany, England Sweden..) for the same economic Objet to abuse people in different markets places.
AllNothing You have to get out of your optimistic and stay realistic. Let me help you: Who is the owner of the assets? I assume bellzone but which one? The one registered in London, the franckfurt one, the Sweden one, or the former bellzone Perth?