Member Info for JuniorLassonde

Agreed: https://x.com/TaviCosta/status/1952494720598569168

Never give up HD. Reach out to others as well - Roast, Charles A, Cooper Lemon. It's a failing on behalf of the GLR PR function that is unacceptable and also unacceptable that you would feel the need to go to others. But if you do not want to get played like a fiddle then keep pushing on several fronts. You will unlikely get additional information on this BB going forward from those who have been persistent and got a response for reasons I outlined below. No doubt you would be courteous as you seem like that type of chap, but I have heard CB has received some grotesque Emails in the past - and what do people think his response to those characters would be? Silence no doubt.

Best to focus on key drivers of share price:

1. Commodity Prices (30%)

2. Exploration and Development Results (30%)

3. Market Sentiment and Speculation (25%)

4. Company Specific Factors (10%)

5. Funding and Financial Health (5%)

And ask questions to the exec - via Email and on this board. When was the last time anyone contacted the exec and PR function for updates? I know some do. It takes persistence and usually pays off but like I said yesterday there is now very little point in sharing that response on here because you will get accused of making it up e.g. NDAs existence and that gets a bit tiresome.

I also think it is a good strategy to contact others e.g. Roast PR - why have you not covered GLR in a long while? Charles Archer - why or do you think Luansobe is getting closer to a deal as has been said previously? Cooper Lemon - what's the hold up? etc. Are any of those been told to reduce engagement?

I want to know what role the additional NED is performing - I have not seen an uptick in PR, and I have not seen any updates to the website of worth so what is the purpose of that additional NED? If you don't want to get played like a fiddle then verify everything. Cross-check claims with raw data or primary sources - I have, I know others have aplenty, and that's why they are still here with their investment and often buying the dips. I bet the TR1 holder has checked and verified as well. Grab the bow and write your own music on that fiddle. It's your investment. Don't wait for others to provide you information because in general, they will not.

Personally, I would be betting on the Chinese for a deal on Luansobe and Ka$hitu open pits.

Possible a bigger entity for the Luansobe deeps/underground license.

Re "It is totally reasonable to ask for regular updates, suggesting ways of getting them and for a fulltime CEO to actually get things moving" I agree with regular updates (the PR person needs to be doing their job properly), it's the fulltime CEO requirement I question - my preference is to have a full time Project Manager managing all aspects of e.g. Luansobe Open Pit, and providing regular updates via the PR person and CB. CB can then focus on deals and the like, the PM can focus on the hard yards on the ground. We have Cooper Lemon who can help with the stakeholder management on the ground, and I recall a PM who was a "real livewire" who we have not heard anything from but appears is till on the payroll.

not convinced by the full time aspect. i would however appoint a full time project manager or equivalent, boots on the ground, to get luansobe and separately ka****u across the line with the ceo giving a steer along with cooper lemon.

No idea. It was a fair and balanced Post. Try and re-post..

this is what i would be looking at as a whole. but simple incremental improvements on any will help sentiment and therefore sp.

1. press releases: announce key developments (e.g., drilling results, permits) with clear, data-driven narratives.

2. distribute via newswires and mining-specific platforms.

3. social media: use x and linkedin to share updates, engage with investors, and amplify news.

4. post infographics or videos summarising project progress e.g. luansobe open pit, ka****u ore sampling (satellite images indicate 'something')

5. website: maintain an updated, investor-friendly site with project details, technical reports etc.

6. investor presentations: create compelling slide decks for conferences, webinars, or one-on-one meetings - the last one shown is in 2020.

7. media outreach: pitch stories to mining journals (e.g., copperbelt katanga) and financial outlets (e.g. uk investors magazines).

8. community engagement: host town halls or site tours to build local support and transparency.

there is plenty of opportunity to improve each of the aspects above. i once worked with a company that also did the following rigorously:

1. track share price movement, trading volume, and investor inquiries post-announcements.

2. monitor media coverage and social media engagement (e.g., x post interactions).

3. measure website traffic and downloads of technical reports or presentations.

4. assess community sentiment through feedback at local engagements.

i personally think the following would also help:

5. faq and ability to comment/ ask questions via the glr website in a feedback loop approach.

it's not rocket science. and if you want a 10 bagger from the portfolio (achievable imo) then you can also do some steady pr yourselves. it is not about creating a false market as cb states, it's about bringing the potential to the market to see.

Best not to get bent out of shape. The key point we can all agree on is PR is not up to scratch.

Https://galileoresources.com/about-us/board-of-directors-key-management/

You might want to add your post to here BS. It was fair and balanced. Same with MM.

And before you ask, I did not request removal of the Iky/Levi conspiratorial thread. Maybe the admin got bored.

Hi Iani, there are good things and bad things associated with GLR. I think in the fog of arguments the good things are mostly overlooked, ignored, or ridiculed as far as I can ascertain. That has led to poor sentiment. I know that gives some the opportunity to accumulate large holdings at a cheap price and good luck to them. But it does not help others who may have sold out based on BB dynamics.

I think focusing on the assets, and pushing for change is good. Constructive dialogue going forward between shareholders and execs will definitely attract other investors who might have some information that helps other shareholders or indeed show the exec that GLR investors are a voice to be heard and in general are sensible people. That will improve sentiment which is a key driver of share price.

The case for good PR is that Market sentiment is import on AIM Juniors. GLR recently took on a new NED with PR experience, and there is a director - Sylvia Vrska - Manager Corporate & Investor Relations whose responsibility is to ensure investors are informed, and potential investors seek out Galileo resources. The website needs to be updated and the last website presentation shown is 2020. Roast PR seems to be the only outlet, with occasional Zak Mir interviews. Weak questions are seen through. Tough questions command more respect. Time-lines are swerved. There was a presentation in 2023 which is no longer shown on the website. There is a very strong argument that the PR function is not working and I would be looking to re-structure across the CB family of companies to have one expert PR individual paid a % from each who has the get up and go to make sure GLR is firing on all PR cylinders.

That said, CB can make deals. He is not going anywhere and so the best course of action will be to work with him not against him. Why? Because market sentiment is a significant % contributing factor to share price. Focusing on the assets will likely bear more fruit than 'playing the man'. Investors on the whole know what they are buying into which is an experienced individual who can build a portfolio of assets that will likely have several multi-bagging opportunities. So what drives the SP in a Junior Miner: Make your own %s. Mine are:

1. Commodity Prices (30%)

2. Exploration and Development Results (30%)

3. Market Sentiment and Speculation (25%)

4. Company Specific Factors (10%)

5. Funding and Financial Health (5%)

I liked that expression about getting out the 'man purse'. I will use that :-)

Thanks for the response Metalhead. The website is very light on detail (minimalistic) and very out of date. More detail and regular comms would mean more investors taking a serious look. It could be one the reasons why attracting bigger, stable investors needs a lot of work. Who does the PR? Even [LINK REMOVED] is out of date - CB is 81 and 82 in November and the website says he is 77 which is likely when the website was created.

If you invented an anti-gravity machine and are not advertising it then the Market Cap would be zippo in comparison to what you have!

Zambia (Galileo 75%, JV with Statunga 25%)

Ore Reserve: 5,600,000 tonnes @ 1% Cu (above 0.25% Cu cut-off).

Mine Life: 10 years est.

Annual Ore Mined: 560,000 tonnes

Head Grade: 1% Cu

Recovery: 90% (percentage of copper chemically extracted at the concentrator/plant)

Payable Metal: 95% (portion of contained copper paid for by smelter after refining deductions)

Payable Copper Produced/Year: 4,788 tonnes

Copper Price: $10,000/tonne

Annual Revenue: $47,880,000

Operating Cost/tonne: $20, split as: Mining $5, Processing $10, Transport $2, TC/RC $2, Royalties $1

Annual Operating Cost: $11,200,000

Annual Profit (pre-tax, pre-capex): $36,680,000

Profit/tonne: $65.50

Applying taxes or initial investment would reduce profit further as would a pure JV. A shorter mine life improves the NPV.

There is bigger and additional scope within the overall license area so it would seem a reasonable bet that GLE could sell off the open pit with the second mining license underground mine thrown in and the deeper underground potential as a shared interest. There are many options. No heavy lifting required from GLR. The external consultants will have other ideas. Impact on Market Cap could be significant.

Reading some of the threads below. There is a big difference between COMEX and LME. The Copper price drop was on COMEX which services primarily the North American Market. The historical divergence for copper price between COMEX and LME is now getting back to normal. Most physical copper contracts in Zambia have and will likely always reference the LME Copper price so it is business as usual and LME Copper price is healthy. COMEX had little or no impact for most sellers and buyers. The trend for copper is up, and the forecast for copper is up as the world needs a huge amount of copper.

What is the elevator pitch for buying into Tertiary. Thanks.

What's the elevator pitch for buying this share. Genuine question.