RE: Doesn,t read good. To me anyway!10 Apr 2017 15:23
litigation was removed because the ECHPT 2009 had be replaced with the rejected most ECHPT 2013, therefore longer valid only regional spatial plans, until the adoption of a new ECHPT. However the new Regional Framework of Crete Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development (PPCHSAA Crete) is not yet enacted, despite the assurances of the Minister of Environment G. Stathaki [1] to be completed by the end of 2017, everything indicates that it will take a long time yet.
So the SEA for the Cavo Sidero, although approved, lacks spatial and hence legal basis, following these developments, now applies only in Regional Context Crete in 2003, which has provisions for such "development" in Cape Iron . It is worth noting that in the under review PPCHSAA Crete, the directions given for use of Cavo Sidero are in agreement with previous Regional Planning, and its account of that relates to tourism arises only from the contractual obligation of the research group to harmonize the regional Planning the Special Planning Framework for Tourism, but no longer applies! In particular, it highlights the need for strengthening of the primary sector in conjunction with the development of mild forms of tourism to ensure the protection and enhancement of natural and cultural assets both Peninsula Iron and the wider region [2] . An excerpt of the review PPCHSAA Crete states: "Geological Sitia Park could include all the visitors unity as an outdoor geological-archaeological museum, with a network of marked trails and peak areas of interest bay Erimoupolis and natural Vai" (Stadium B, 2014: 22, Issue 8).
When the Special Spatial Plan Strategic Investments (ESCHASE) eventually joining a supernatant land, will start the real "calvary" of the necessary studies and authorizations for the investment, since according to the reasoning of the Council of State, the SEA is only "assessment investor "in the Planning and environmental data and for this reason the SEA is not per se evaluation nor substitute required by law and permitting process [3] .
So far the only positive for the investment impact of the spill on the Council of State decision was a slight rise in Minoan PLC shares from 0.06 to 0.12 pounds, but is not expected to dampen the negative performance of the company as recorded in the annual financial accounts. The financials of Minoan PLC does not give much hope for finding the 267.7 million € which is the estimated cost of the investment. The President of the company, with the day before yesterday announcement, informs the investors that the company is facing difficulties in the development of investment, citing the complex processes in real estate transactions and financial uncertainty in Greece. [4]
The failure in the design of this investment, and the like (eg Hills Atalanti Atalanti Fthiotida and golf Afantou Rhodes), has shown so far to conduct a "first left" government and one for the first time ecologist envi