Member Info for johnychainlocker

More buys than sells as AJB now quoting 22.09p to sell, up slightly from earlier this am . Let's hope it can stay above 22p and rise further

Looks like 22p is the top range the hedgies are allowing so far today. Never ceases to amaze me how those algorithms work such that they can control, or as I prefer to say 'manipulate', the SP in such tight limits.As soon as the price steps above 22p the bots step in and bring it back down!

We need a shock to sort them out!!

Agree @Coldspy

Yes @ Surin, but it's the changes that are the relevance, not just the number of forms they bang out

Agree Falcon, - making a lot of sense to me also Luca

This time from Morgan Stanley, who it APPEARS have made more Purchases than Sales , it appears!

I say 'APPEARS' 'cos I'm certainly not going to add up the net CFD column!

Highlighting the confusing nature of these forms @Surin.

It does indeed say under Purchases/Sales : Purchases 453,747, but next box down under 'Cash --settled Derivatives' it states CFD "Reducing a Long Position " 453,747.

All I can make from it is a small reduction in their NET Long?

@Coldspy - link for you:

https://www.investegate.co.uk/company/WG.

@Surin

I'm not sure about that regarding SG, you may understand these forms better than I do, which wouldn't be difficult, but on 16th April SG Interests 23,766,056 (3.44%), Short positions 17,698,273 (2.56%), so to my simple mind that looks like they have reduced their net long?

07:47hrs @coldspy SG Net Long : 23,312,309 Interests (3.37%), 17,244,526 short positions (2.49%)

Nice one bigsmoke - start the day with some humour 👍

21.47p to buy , 21.38p to sell with AJB

On surface looks like reduced short position slightly but with all thes cfd's, derivatives etc - Not clear what going on with them. Wish they would make the forms clearer - it's like filling in a box on a form which states "Are you Male of Female " Tick Yes/No!

Another Form 8.3 RNS from SG - still don't fully understand those b.... forms!!

@AJ1987 - 'cos the market ain't open yet!

Carrot's our resident comedian @Robert. Obviously lost a sh** load early on with WG and to make himself feel better he has to take delight in others who have lost out but perhaps not as much as him. Best to ignore or filter

@Ice - "if the accounts are not clean, they can't be published"

I'm going to take it that when you say 'clean' you mean the accounts must be the audited accounts. What do you mean otherwise by 'clean' ?

Agree this BOD should be gone, now that would be clean as far as WG go!

@Ice "What’s actually laughable though is this, the Sidara deal is conditional on the accounts being clean" - that's just a premise of yours?

Sidara only have to find the accounts ACCEPTABLE to them. There is obviously an issue with the accounts but Sidara might be prepared to go ahead with what is revealed in the audited accounts, who knows, but they haven't stated that the accounts have to be 'clean' anywhere, at least not to my knowledge.

I've just gone from owning 0.0000437% to 0.0000372% FYI 😂

Nice one @kotichava - good summary of holdings, thanks