Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
He hails from Nigeria!
Offers to buy your SDRY shares incoming any moment, togerther with request for your bank details etc!!
Nice find Temuchin
How so @Barn?
- Liberum was a net sell when you look at the Form
Just out of interest here Toffers, not saying I don't believe you for one minute, but as you have made a statement about your purchases, your post to back that up is a little weak, as Temuchin purports.
Below are my purchase details from 09/02/24, copied from AJ Bell contract note, which are quite clear, with trading venue 'XLON', date, 'bought' etc, etc.
Name and address of course are 'X'd out.
In interest of honesty here, can you do the same with whoever you trade with?
That's a serious amount of wonga and I would hate to see ANYONE lose all that, if that is what turns out
-and if you can Toffers, then hats off to you, you've got a helluva pair of "cajones" and GL to you !
START:
"Mr.xxxxxxxxxxx
North Yorkshire
United Kingdom
XXXX XXX
Account No. XXXXXX AJ Bell ISA for Mr. XXXXXXXXX
CONTRACT NOTE
09/02/24 13/02/24 13.29 CJDDWP Bought B60BD27
Deal date Settlement date Bought or Sold Time Reference Sedol
Venue Quantity Price Consideration
XLON 2,427 0.412 999.92 GBP
Dealing charge 4.95
Stamp duty 5.00
_____________
Total debit 1,009.87
SUPERDRY PLC ORD GBP0.05
This transaction is subject to the rules of the London Stock Exchange
We have bought for you as agent
GBP
A02263I CONTNOTE 09022024 A02263 000000157201192 44624CJDDWP
Order type: Limit order
AJ Bell Management Limited (company number 03948391), AJ Bell Securities Limited (company number 02723420) and
AJ Bell Asset Management Limited (company number 09742568) are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
All companies are registered in England and Wales at 4 Exchange Quay, Salford Quays, Manchester M5 3EE. See website for full details.
Tel: 0345 54 32 600
Email: dealingservices@ajbell.co.uk"
END
Very true @Steve0
Latest quote from AJ Bell 38.35p to buy £2500, 38.3p to sell - no probs getting quotes. Very tight spread
Yeah, but how many you gonna sell today Toffers?
Could they be Toffers missing transactions?
Agree Scotty - and the 'blaming' of the 10%'ers?
"then they collapse the sp between 3.30pm and 4pm when they shift out"
Who said that ?
If you can't buy perhaps you're using the wrong broker?
I have no problem obtaining quote with AJ Bell - just quoted 36.1p for £1000 purchase
Toffers, Toffers, Toffers - dear oh dear!!
Please click on the link I have put here:
"https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-13082573/FCA-Organised-crime-crackdown-prompts-London-arrests.html?ico=mol_desktop_money"
The headline is from 'This Is Money' : 'FCA organised crime crackdown prompts London arrests'
Like I said before, try doing your research a little more thoroughly.
The subsequent post's headline was created by a poster in response to the above on the 15th Feb, prompting a perfectly legitimate discussion between 4 other posters over two days, which expanded to other discussion under the same banner, like I tried to explain before and seem to have to do so again, quite normal on BB's
For eg - What has this little spat got to do with "RE: RNS DROP". Get it Toffers?
Your rather childish 'reporting' to LSE (a chat room btw, it's not THE LSE in case you weren't aware) represents the same daftness and naivety you show in making 10x tiny little 50 quid purchases, with related costs, and expecting the share price to rise because of them.
Apologies folks - this really is the last response - "you can take a horse to water but................."
Thought I was going to make it the last, but really can't let that last comment lie Toffers.
The heading ORIGINATED on the SAME day by a poster called geOrge123, and like I tried to explain, I was merely replying to him under the same heading - please do your research more carefully and get the 'victimhood' out of your psyche. Your gender matters not a jot here, and in fact another female, MaryBr, posts regularly on other boards and is a well respected poster.
Perhaps it's what she posts that really makes the difference? Think about it
Toffers- last respone because this is boring and must be for other posters here too.
I have put no such misleading heading on anything.
It is quite common practice to make comments using headings that are created by posters for the sake of speed and not cluttering up BB's with new headings everytime someone wants to make a comment.
Stop barking, settle down, carry on wasting charges/stamp duty on piddling little investment amounts just to prove a point, and get on with the rest of your day.
No further comment
Wow Toffers, 500 quid even!
Bound to be huge jump in share price when they go through,eh!
@Toffers
"why the sp has remained stagnant when there are clearly buys not being reported" you said.
Like I said, you don't seriously think that your 300quid purchases are supposed to make a difference to the share price - get real. (And don't please hide behind "you don't know what other trades aren't being reported")
It's normal everday stuff in the 'market'
Toffers, You surely don't expect £50 share purchases/sells to make any difference to the price , do you?
Those 10 silly trades have already cost you about 20% of the 'investment' made, and for what - to get back at the shorters?!
Really!!!
W Pleasure@Phyl.
I really don';t know why it is not put forward more by the likes of AJ Bell and HL, instead they 'feature' Fidelity Index World P, which is in itself, a nice long term, low cost, buy and forget index fund, However L&G's performance over the long term is superior.
It also compares very well with VUSA, Vanguards S&P 500 fund, similar holdings but again L&G is better performer.
You will remeber perhaps the story of Warren Buffet's wager with the active fund managers of USA. He bet them a million dollars (to be given to charity) that over 10 years none of the fund managers would beat the simple S&P index. He won the bet!
I can't find a better performer with an equally low ongoing charge. Sure some of the better fund managers like Terry Smith and Nick Train's funds can have periods of out performing, but over the long term I'll stick with L&G Global 100 Index
@Phyl - have you tried comparing the performance of the funds you mentioned with L&G Global 100 index, especially over the long term?
I think you would be surprised, it's a tenth of the cost over Fundsmith, for eg, the performance is v. good over the long term, and it's Legal and General!
Valid point PFCvet -
however my belief is that the shorters were already aware of Schroders reducing, and that PFC were FORCED into the "Press Release" on the 4th December because of the rapid decline in the share price and the lack of ANY information whatsoever in the public domain at the time.
My opinion is that PFC board should have released the information as soon after they received it as possible, instead of letting all the wild speculation develop as to why the share price was dropping without any apparent reason.
They could have released the information contained in the press release of the 4th Dec within the business update issued much later on the 20th. Dec
The confusion, the total blackout of info. exacerbated the falls and strengthened the shorters' hands. You will note that once ALL the information was public the share price staged quite a recovery from approx 17.5p on the 11th Dec to approx. 40p at the end of Dec
Bit of a 'technical' issue here Tuan.
PFC were notified on 1st Dec.'23, that Schroders had substantially reduced their holding. It is very clear in the TR-1 Form of 10th Jan. '24, Box 6
Prior to the 1st Dec.'23, PFC had indicated a business update was shortly to be announced, which they did in their RNS of 4th December '23.
No mention was made in that Press Release of the fact that Schroders had sold the majority of it's holding.
Petrofac issued a Trading Update on the 20th December,.
Again. no mention was made of Schroder's move even though PFC Board was fully aware of the situation regarding Schroder
PFC stated that they did not receive the OFFICIAL TR-1 Form from Schroders until the 9th January, and released it straightaway on the 10th Jan '24, in ACCORDANCE with regulations.
What is not at all clear or acceptable, is why PI's were kept in the dark in the period from 1st December '23 to 10th January '24 about Schroders much reduced holding.
If you remember, at the time, there was almost a complete blackout from PFC, despite many communications to IR at the time. about the massive drop in PFC share price.
Nada, nothing - and yet THEY KNEW!
PFC's 'excuse', 'get -out' or what you will, is that they could not inform the market of the information in the TR-1 from Schroders until after they received the official form on the 9th January., and that the delay was due to a "technical Issue"
In the meantime the hedgies pounced, and made PFC the biggest short holding in the market, and if some people want to put this down to coincidence, or solely the 'business update' of the 4th Dec, then be that as it may, I for one do not.
My firm belief is that during that period the hedgies had learned of Schroders position (very difficult to keep a lid on that with all the parties involved) and that caused a double whammy to the share price - and in all that time silence from the Board!
Were Schroders asked not to release their Tr-1 until after PFC board issued their business update so as to minimize the damage.
Was it even surpressed?
What is the 'technical issue' that caused a 6 week delay to the issuance of the TR-1 from Schroder?
It all 'smells'