Member Info for John117

That would be a very positive sign in my view.

I’m happy with that.

I get paid Thursday, not convinced it will still be down here then, but there’s a chance I guess.

Just watched it again, there is a lot in what he says. The home trial part, in particular, sounds very promising to me.

Here be a chart:
https://m.marketscreener.com/SYNAIRGEN-PLC-4004905/charts/

Also I think this could be a good week, I suspect we won’t get an RNS just yet though, given the YouTube video release recently. But I could be wrong.

I feel excited about this week, things will be starting to happen here on in. Melton guy gave it a boost. Let’s hope it helped him.

JM, I notice you joined LSE on the 20th, you might be better served going through previous posts, we have covered patents previously and many other things also.

Thanks ShareSting.

So why didn’t that occur in vitro with SARS COV 1? This is a non story IMHO.

My faith is with the top brains in the SNG team, not some keyboard warrior trying to create an entry point for themselves. I always go back to basics, why are you here if you don’t believe in the product ? Just move along if you thinks it’s no good.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27469342/

Lot of fear being pumped here. Cytokine storms were not caused in flu and cold sufferers that have had SNG001 previously. 230 people already tested with it. I’m very confident on that one.

Double check origin.

course

And it mentions a 100 person trial. If anyone knows of another I’d really like to know about it? Of cause he could have been placebo.

There’s no other Nebuliser trial. He was on a placebo trial as well. That’s defo us no question. I saw the tv interview and thought it was but this confirms it.

This is the guy I saw on the TV the other week. I though it was us and posted on here. He didn’t mention the nebuliser on camera. But now it’s confirmed by the local rag. This is good news.

It’s air tight, no worries on that one.

It’s as I thought, there is no evidence either way so WHO is on the side of caution.

Thought they said there was no evidence that recovery protects against re-infection. Which sounds like as ‘nothing’ statement to me. I mean is there any evidence either way?