Member Info for jl5006

Raxf
At face value u may be led to believe all sorts.
HHale was taken over by Cannacord in 17 and Miton holding similarly went away in 17 - so I don't see how Miton have been selling

There is no evidence that Miton had such a holding. I have trawled back 18 months.
There are other companies with FCRM epic - not in uk.
Any change in a disclosable holding needs to be notified - not 1%.
Guess this info is ??

Jab
I only have info from Coy website :
As at 9 Feb :
Sharp 14.2% : B Rock 9.7% : Cannacord 8% : Killick 5.6%.
Should Miton have held more than 3% then an RNS should have been issued should they have sold

Lucky
Where did you come across the Miton info?

Ron
Don't follow your link to Yu Energy.
Fcrm is not an energy supplier.
Don't follow ur risk comment about working capital. I don't know but assume that the draw down on the loan facility was to purchase pipelines which will have a net addition to income after interest. That would mean that working capital remains unimpeded. Just my thoughts since I am remain very positive about prospects!

Jab
The threshold for disclosure is 3% cf Ftse 5%.
If holding is below that level then there will be no disclosure so if an II chose to sell its holding - then there would be an additional 6,000,000 to clear. My thoughts as to why SP is suppressed.

Snige
I guess u want JC with his customs union - single market and the absolute decline of all that enabled us to get over Blair and Brown.
There is no future under May but there is but dismay with JC involved or that dumpling Thornb.
Lest u lose your loved for EU why not moved to the outskirts of Paris where I am sure u will be warmly welcomed.
I would not want to live in the North East with the views u have>

Harry
All theory of course
We will get the full info in a few months - can't see why cash flow should be under pressure - and why you think the SP could be further depressed.
We have just been told that the Coy has a contract to install 90 thousand smart meters - you are not going to get an update every month.
Should you have researched the Coy you should have found that it is not a jack in the box.

RXav
Yr comment ca 7 50
I was referring only to my post which was below yours. My opinion only. Sorry for any confusion.

Not just sad - but amoral in that the EU will do anything to get the £39billion.
Morals - Labour is full of pig sxxt - May does not know it is April.
Should some sensible member say no - then we can leave and with ease as the Dover port manager said and so said Felixstowe - but not our crap CS or Mps.
Worse than kak and worse than mairde.
Sad indeed that the house that represents us is but a tas de boue. And as Voltaire said - Je pense donc je suis - but you need a friend to get u out of that! cos if u are but one - u don't exist!

Michael
The evaluation would be taken as part of the year end process post 31 Jan. Thus in the period to the date of the RNS
In my opinion - the comment below RXdav is a personal comment.

Michael
I did try to explain below.
The auditors are required to test to see if any impairment is required as to fixed assets , intangible assets etc to ensure that the value on the BS can be supported.
LB said that customer numbers had declined in the period to 31 Jan - so the carrying value of goodwill - needed to be reduced.
you will find goodwill on many Balance sheets - and some larger companies may wish to write it off over a period of years.
The effect of the write back is to claw back the dividend that would have been paid or part of it.

Public service debt
Until early 2000+ local authorities did not disclose the pension liability until I & E accounts were imposed. The equal and opposite entry was to a Govt A/C - off balance sheet I am sure. PFI liabilities were treated similarly -I believe.
In fact the whole of the LA org was never fully disclosed as a debt.
That may have changed - I doubt it .
We cast doubt on disclosures by other countries but we are not open about what is owed.
Liabilities relating to Police - pensions funded by current contributions and the difference parked elsewhere- teachers pensions again funded by current contributions with the excess the liability parked somewhere
And NIRP again funded from current contributions. Excess required -
I worked for an organisation Govt - where the irregularities - the excess and the gains were parked to Poland - a non disclosed a/c.
We seek to challenge others yet there has never been a full and relevant disclosure of the UKs liabilities.

Clucker
Like 2 see ur strong buy?
Just a throw away comment I guess?

And if the underlying earnings of 13.1p are reduced by the factor 110/180 then the net earnings of c8p would provide a divi of 4p.
Conjecture at this stage and without the cruiseship improved profit to come I believe that there is no reason to run.
DYOR

Daz
The Investopedia comment is correct . The reason Saga wrote back part of the value carried on the balance sheet was according to LB because of a loss of customers.
Should there be an increase in the number of customers from the same source as the original there will be no adjustment back to the BS
When ever a company buys another the difference between the asset value and the price paid is booked as goodwill.
Physical assets are subject to impairment review just as intangibles (goodwill etc)
Saga was made to adjust the carrying value by the auditors - I am sure - because no company wants to write back and impact the I & E
Given a revised bottom line for the current year of c £110 million and a commitment to distribute net profit as 50% divi I can't see why you want to sell. Yes the CEO is a submarine driver and seems out of his depth but that can be changed.
And don't forget Govt interference in all utilities and services - you can change from a bad deal to a good deal. (Except when it applies to them!) has done no good - change .change chang!
That has meant turmoil

There is a lot of comment about the referendum result 52% for leaving 48% against - yet HOC want to ignore the small majority.
So. 90% of voter s did not endorse the Labour Union Rep in the Newport Bi election. Yet Labour says - such a good result. Labour dont want to accept 52/48 - happy to accept 10/90 against -

Woody
I see that you want to censure this BB because comments are not Lloy specific.
Unless personal comments are to be prohibited then let the status quo continue.
You seem to like to post - not many takers tho@

VB
Lloy is a domestic bank - not an international bank.
It had some offices outside the UK but I believe these were closed.
HOC actions have a direct result on domestic banks and comment about leaving the EU So these should be heard.
If this was a Barclays BB then speculation about targets in EU would be relevant only if there was any indication of any such investment.

Snige
Your posts suggest that all jobs are crap. Indeed they are because HR rights mean you cant be you.
When u destroy the fabric of what was by demanding that women be paid the same as men in a warehouse when they can't lift a pack of 50 kilos is part of the problem!.
On the question of disability - I have never seen so many crutches and walking sticks on the street - but when they go into Weatherspoons they waltz up the stairs to the toilets. This country has become a basket case for all that is wrong - wont work.