Member Info for Jimzi

The autos clearly gave you a beating then ! Suggest you don’t read the bb for a while then. Most posters here are interested in the prospects and evidence of IC and not peeps who trade around the date they submit a request.

Previously, theres so much self doubt and worrying cause it’s 7p. If it had adjusted to 20p as per the auction o Thursday opening , everyone would be positive. Lesson in human behaviour and controlled thinking MTFB is now the same mcap as IMM - failed P3- and is less than, not even started Phase 2 SCLP. Very strong cases made for approval- autos really squeezing the traders - well , time for lookers and holders to decide. It’s in play. During the 1508 to 1519 period of no trades, as commented on at the time, the dummy for volume was all over the place - varying from 6.85 to 8.738 but moving within this 11 min window with no trades . There’s your clue. That’s why I study the book. To see the underlying forces.

Exactly. I don’t see a problem at all. P3 testing agreed with FDA If your identical to Van on liver and beats it hands down renally, and Vans approved then scientifically it has to be approved. At the end of the day, going to be difficult to refute that logic.

and 1519 when they were every second before - they are waiting to see the effect of their auto blitz.

They will keep lobbing little grenades both ways till day traders give up - they want those 5p shares winkled out to come back home!!

you can sell 500k above the bid. Now why would they offer that!! And 8.35 to buy

Good luck trading for 5%

Nah, its the auto bots shredding the traders who don't know whats going on.

Di you warn you - they can drag you where they want if you in it for a day trade

Mcaps 22m v 18.5m

IMM failed P3, no news about what they are going to do for 8 months - 100% need to raise cash if they do proceed with another P# and years behind us in commercialisation..

Not knocking IMM - just an illustration of the ridiculous mcap we have now versus potential rewards

You can do the same comparison with all the others who failed P3

I just don't get why peeps don't get it.

All covered in my summary.

Volume massively down pointing to traders throwing in the towel at this level.

Look, we are all bumkins when it comes to high tech medicines apart from Ivy. But to me being a layman

The P3 trials have IC v VAN as a two two draw on livers and zero seven win for IC re kidneys.

So it must be better than VAN

All safe, liver functions reverted to normal.

VAN approved for ages, all drugs have a warning list and IC is a non resistant AB.

I assume P3 trails are designed with a view to meeting approval criteria so any advice as to how IC can actually be rejected, please post.

All this outpouring of self doubt has been caused by the Pru selling 14m shares on Thursday, not the science of IC

I thought you were quietly confident yesterday Sheltie and now a lottery?

I'm very confident of approval for the reasons as outlined in my mini ppt presentation above!

We have the global AB resistance amageddon story thrust on us for the past 3 years. 22,000 deaths on the US from AB resistance each year. [I pasted the link before] and here is a new non resistant AB. As you say, slap a label on it to cover your behind

Frankly, if it doesn't get approved, there's no hope for the world and I shall become a Buddist monk - cause they tend to do friends with benefits

Line 4 again - June.

Cheerio

Line 4.

The beauty of the Herc amendment is they are not in a rush and can wait until after the FDA tea party.

Forecast mcap post approval ranged from conservative bb thoughts of 180m to Peel Hunt 300m.

FDA require more data - unknown but not new trials.

Find out in one month - could be simple resolution or a bit more tweaking with some liver gents.

Cash OK till June but will need some - how much unknown until meeting in one month.

Only non resistant AB under development. - the industry is fully aware of this.

Mcap today 21m likely to have been caused by the Pru selling 14m shares

Current sp action - pass the parcel. When the music stops and traders have given up trying to beat the DMAs - and they won't beat them, then it will rise.

Please feel free to correct anything that is inaccurate.

If you can't join the dots, get an cash ISA

and it wouldn't suprise me that someone at the Pru misread or misinterpretated the RNS and thought it had been rejected.

There is alot of thick people in finance, trust me.

Well it could have been an automatic internal order if Invesco allows machines to run their long term holdings - if so, its a pretty crap system cause everyman and his dog knows whats going to happen to an immediate execute at best for 10% on opening

Or I may be wrong and it was the Pru who farted which then caused Invesco to kick in some minutes later - actually, that makes more sense..

And diluted, Invesco are still 17% so I may have to apologise to Invesco and turn my vent to the Pru.!

If its the Pru, it makes it worse - a 14m sale caused an unprecedented car crash.

I assume the AGM is in the US - I'd love to ask Invesco.

Anyway, the point I was making is one single knee jerk transaction has moulded the whole perception of the mcap

Indeed - send me an e mail its first name and surname @yahoo.com.

Usually down the smoke 4 times a year.

The prices are 7.55 v 8.9 for half a big one btw - thats the real book if any traders are interested

Living in Chester with the dented petty pension but which shall return. Halcyon days they were then Mate! Worlds a lot more miserable and serious but I suppose everyone says that when they are older .

You see if they wanted out of MTFB at best, they would have allowed the auction price of 21 p stand and throughout the day load the ask to sell at best and it would no doubt have dropped to 10p after shifting the lot. ( with the Pru). But you would have had buyers seeing a bargain if it opened at 21p. So there would have been a sort of orderly market. But they chose to dump 10 pc on the bell 75pc below auction, yet keep 14pc. Clearly my point is flawed if a TR from them comes through, but if it doesn’t, it raises the question, knowing it would risk Hercules default, what are they up to. ? They are more responsible for our sp demise than the FDA

This share has traded those vol autos for the past 4 years. Algos, manipulation- whatever - our great conference man pointed it out. Still a star imo It’s the missing 40m sold on Thursday upto 1030. It’s either triggered stop losses or an ii. But does it matter beyond interest? More interesting is the effect. Auction pre dump was 21p One second later with almost certainly Invesco’s 58 m plonked on the ask. Percentage wise, that cause a 75pc drop from 21p. And magically, we all accept this is the true price and try and justify things from this reference point. So Invesco have determined this range with no spefic valuation justification , just a dump of 10 pc of the co. We have all been led to accept it should be priced here - control And if there is no further Invesco TR, they still own 14pc. All of this makes us lose sight of the real value of the companies assets- cause someone dumped, they must know something. But if they did, they wouldnt still hold 14pc would they. And all of us LTHs had a little fart at 0805 when 5p flashed up - that’s how you adjust expectations - very effective But some time later you’ll think how could it have been at 7p.

I see that the other bb are beginning to see it’s a no brainier here. Most risk free play on AIM -

Well. Thursday is the only day for significant sells. ( all later is trading / bagger swirl) There’s a missing 40m (other 60m TR’d) book rapidly turned after 100m so that’s your number Either stop losses ( which would be all holdings with any price above 4.5p) or an ii. Given the known drop when the RNs landed at 7, that’s I hour for a lot of peeps who saw a probable 40 pc drop set a stop loss. 88pc drop and all gone. Won’t know till later but I’m sure Invesco still at 14 pc - their order for 10 pc done and not enough subsequent vol for anymore taking into account the trading churn.