Member Info for Jimzi

we don't get any further TR reductions and the other half of the Thursday dump was strop losses triggered - perfectly possible that 25% of PIs had stop losses on, especially possible that they were put on the hour before opening , then iis are at 45%.

2 things
1] There is some muscle behind the bod if opportunist predators are about
2] Pre-emption rights should apply.

M&G bought 9% just before the CLR - the iis aren't like day traders - slightly more patient and realise the potential.

And paying down the debt with 2m till May - they are actiually stronger - the amended loan has bought invaluable time so everyone can relax a bit and see if minor or major. They have alluded to cash management - thats why.

BTW, you could have and still can shift 500k at 6.9p for the last 3.5 hours.- to buy 7.89p.atm and alot of the time no price.

Thats your guide, not L2 - thats just to play the minnows

The good news about Reuters info is that it shows it is an accurate reflection of ii holdings.

https://uk.reuters.com/business/stocks/financial-highlights/MTFB.L

Updates for Invesco it seems. as showing 50% ii.
Assume the Pru done later and 45%

Hercules are lenders so its no suprise there would have been an amendment. Indeed, it looks as they have been reasonable - they are still taking a risk.

But the good bit is now there is enough cash [until May] to get to a definitive assessment as to whether its a blip and easily fixed or more - so the amount of cash required can be determined - small or large - the price - low or high and hence dilution - small or large.

Its actually a good RNS given where we are and I'm pretty sure they will drastically cut overheads for the next 2 months as it's time for the BOD to show a bit of business flair and put through a 2 month austrity budget - its not difficult.

Initial auction drop was 12%. But with so many trading shares just bought, of course the mms would milk it- as they know they would bail the second it came out of auction. .

Volume is low as well if this site is correct which points to ii selling finished and the 100m was 50m ii and 50m stop losses. If so, that leaves iis at around 45% atm as it was 60% from memory from the last Reuters.. Of course there may be a late TR held back to spook later!

A few traders with too much emotion and not enough analysis imo

We are all adults and don’t mind losing 88pc on a complete corporate duster or P3 failure etc Goes with the territory ( that’s why I only touch oilers with oil and then rarely) Passed 2 P3 trails But 78pc down currently and negative EV hit due to a letter saying its ok but more data required and we’ll let you ( the market) know later . It’ll correct itself due to collective realisation post shock

Absolutely- the power of that letter is insane. It effectively wipe out the whole mcap through the butterfly effect. It could be like Antares - just resubmit in a different order, or get 2 peeps with liver problems and sorted or redo the lot. It could cost just overhead ( hopefully lots of sabbaticals / shares in lieu of salaries) , mini 2 peeps trial - small cost) or a load for the redo. All adds up to uncertainty which equals panic which equals a stitch up . We purportedly live in a sophisticated world. This must of have sortable in the tailoring of P3 ( for the second time) It’s almost as if.......... businesses and those linked are corrupt as hell. The only plus is that this is when they are getting their position- they ain’t going to bankrupt mtfb, too public. Operation winkle. You know as the EV is joke. EV before all these unknown unknowns as Donald told us ( see the link!) was over £100m ( and the broker and the us one had it at £300m given their £1 pre -approval forecast - ok- over excited) So in short the whole value of MTFB has been written off based on a letter but with no public statement as to the reasons and remedies for/of the letter save a vague comment- just enough to cause panic ! You may think I’m a loon but it’s all highly possible? Car cartel fudging diesel figures? Libor? World Cup and FIFA? It’s Endemic cause they are the only ones outed. My advice to a 30 year old - pile in if you want to be rich and if I’m wrong, you’ve got 40 years to make money elsewhere . It’s a rare opp if you have the balls. I think I’ll join IanB on a sabbatical ( much to spikeys relief - but still waiting for an answer btw) and wait for a ferry. GLA whatever you decide.

Yep, we all missed that one. Had factored in a 50 pc drop if a problem-but, well - the dump - never see anything like it. That said, went EV went negative, I loaded up because it’s a rare event on a not rejected/ approved stand off There are implications for many shares on AIM Anything in P1 or even P2- why bother buying - you’ll have a decade of crap!

That’s why I mentioned new TRs At the end of the day it’s almost inconceivable that the only non resistant AB under development ain’t going to get to the market- 23,000 Americans die each year to AB resistance- and those figures are going to grow. The question is when will we know . And is the current EV of £15m cheap? I’m sure many who buy for longer than a day will have a view.

Well. I had thought the 100m dump on opening was all iis But, given Fish’s horrible experience , any / all holdings with a stop loss on them at any price ( unless below 4.5p) would have been wiped out by Invesco’s action I have no idea of who uses stop losses but I bet Fish isn’t on his own So if TRs reductions are complete it’s positive. - it’s 50m ish atm Then of course, it’s perfectly possible to get some new TRs Nothing will be surprising in the short term

Good find Ian. Seems a convenient little tool to delay the scientific results whilst wiping 88pc off the mcap. Makes you wonder - cause I don’t trust any institution- cause they’re run by people.

To the main bb Just need to prune on a late Saturday night although still waiting for the answer!! Hopefully back to normal tomorrow

Your holding, if any , But I admire your effort spending the wholevday trying to work out sentiment Unfortunately, the autos will dictate ( as you would know had you been in)

iIs have inside info so have sold on info recd I believe you accused us of being naive and Indeed- I have friends in UBS. Additionally, the BOD made a school boy error in not placing at 35p I can’t be bothered to check but by recollection you sAid a placing ain’t poss unless in the low pennies. The bod trashed the SP by stating cash raise. And you totally ignore and understand the significance the 100m dump ( which contradicts your inside nonsense Where’s my answer?

There’s no question there

Could you repeat it in full. Then happy to oblige

No warriors, just waiting in vain for your answer

If I we got a room, I’d still ask the same question If peeps make unfounded assertions and are given reasons as to why it’s unfounded, a reply to the reason is required .- as spiky says it’s a discussion board - presently difficult if no discussion on the question posed. Yes it’s petty but it isn’t. There are many underwater heavily and so when baseless assertions are made to stoke the fears of doubt, I will do my part to expose such reprehensible behaviour This bb was a very good and cooperative as in info exchange . It would be nice to revert to it

BBC 2 - now

Your full of it Here’s the question If iis had inside information, then why didn’t 35m warrants, a load in double the money , excercise? Very simple. No obfuscation. Btw I am watching telly and how Williams got shafted in the 70’s by the Americans

Just need an answer to the question ( for the 7th time?) What happens on other bbs is of no relevance and doesn’t justify posting misleading views. Why can’t you answer it ( the question) ?