Member Info for Jimzi

I don’t think there’s much reputations damage. Antares eg - much bigger than our three musketeers. We tend to forget that even though FDA assisted in submissions, there would be one case manager . The FDA board is a full committee board - there’s a clear risk of miscommunication there. More importantly , we live in a world of risk aversion when it come to civil servants. Safer for them to err on being ultra cautious- if they want a small remedy and it’s done; they are off the hook if the slim chance of the proverbial occurs later on. If they had no objections, knock knock Covering ones own little botty is in this day and age is a greater force than using judgement- hence there are no bank managers in the western worlds - they use computers to asses lending - distinguishes 100 pc any judgement.. And you can never blame an organisation for being too safe . Biggest get out clause ever! So I don’t think the BODs reputation is affected, your dealing with an unawserable judicial system that is not bound by case law - bloody unpredictable- also pain in the arse. They were clearly 100 pc right to get these 3 top doctors on liver stuff. Excellent approach. This must be maintained into completion . Allows FDA to be off the hook. That’s all they need. Someone else to blame if it goes tits up.

Yea, that was the biggest problem over there. Could have done with Iclapitran then. ( note the spelling) Certainly not a liver problem - much lengthier dilemma! But got conditional discharge so needed well!

I was about to put Churchill but thought a bit over the top!! It’s difficult to put into words what mindset is required. As an example, a colleague and I had set up a chartered surveying business in Vietnam in 1996 with our savings and then the Asian flu pandemic popped up. It’s was either 6 months plus of no wages - all other staff on 50 pc - or that’s it. Actually a very easy decision but impressed the local staff understood and even worked harder - we survived to flourish . Probably overthinking it but I’ll be mega ****ed off if there’s no sign of any emolument cuts until . Dunkirk today D- day next month VR day one year ( very rich)

They were all stepford husbands. Imagine going for a drink with those 3. Permanent awkward silence. However, we can’t all be perfect! And I suppose if they were too keen and jolly, we would criticise them. The CLR no new trail comment v sig. Impacts, ease, price and amount of raise. I think the hurdles have been very reduced in the light of that. And although I don’t know what current is precisely when referring to being able to meet all current liabilities, given amendment and the RNS yesterday, there appears to be no rush, another plus when sorting it out . If the brokers have any ability, all these factors make a beneficial raise very poss. I hope GL and Morgan are a bit more savy since Nasdaq - they may be winded but I hope they haven’t forgotten the huge potential having the only non resistant AB underdevelopment at the mo Ivy; he’s your mate, can you make sure he’s got some bloody sharks on our side this time. With the right city boys ( or taking a more firm stance with the existing one) it’s easy. It’s his time to take decisive charge in all aspects and get the job done with military precision and discipline- except we’ve got to wake him up first.

Thats how the ATs work here.

The only way of reading this share is large dummies - L2 & Autos - the DMAs tools of the trade

now that's left the traders in a real quandary!!

I loved the conspiracy laddo - you tell'em!!

As I fell asleep part way through only to be woken by our boy, did they say how long the cash will last?

I think he siad could meet current obs - but I'm not sure how long current is..Nothing on cash management - disappointed no one asked - missed opp for a sp kicker imo as they disclose such plans

Got be admit though, jeez they are all dull - are they less automoton when they speak to people in person?

Neutral imo as no investment info given.re cash managment

One month of trading it is then - Lord help us.

We should get management plans for the next months in different scenarios

Plans are only news if executed.

if anyone is brave enough - may have to modify it:
" WTF were Invesco thinking trashing the sp on opening when the market was happy at 21p auction before they came with their wrecking ball one second into opening.
Ask why they thought putting 58m on the ask was in their own - let alone everyone elses - interests as they still have 14%. Even if you have some investing rules - you don't have to do it before any bugger can blink.

Thats better!!

we have an indication oft he no of trading shares - doubt any LT holders will be selling or buying this morning

How they are going to conserve cash till they know the way forward from here.

Thats critical - I'm sure they will given the wording of yesterdays RNS and amendments.

Chill. They have sorted Hercules out till June. Let’s see the cost reduction proposals- it’s only management time atm ( and we have few staff) so not difficult to control that. So they are fine till the meeting and then they’ll know what to do.

Just say, can’t be bothered with the peeps in the additional data , please approve for everything else? Bit simplistic I know but renal was the aim and that’s 7-0

Are we talking pure science here or subjective interpretation or need for more statistical support. ( standard deviation stuff) which I know sounds contradictory but clearly there’s some balance between the science and judgement as to what validates the science to 95 pc confidence level.?

They are going have cash lockdown until May. In the interim find out what the problem is. That determines how much and at what price. Small prob small raise, big prob, big raise. That’s the total message of the RNS. We’ve renegotiated the loan terms to buy us time to plan the above and Hercules have been very reasonable It’s not rocket science

Yep - you can use IG - and the shorts have dropped there to 6% [thats just % of account holders - so multiple accounts with 1 share - you know the score]

Read it further

The great thing about this bb is that literally no posts effect the DMAs

They have agreed to amend the agreement. They will keep enough to pay Mays if they are still sorting things out.

So that's June.
Thats why the RNS puts the co in a much better place than Friday.cause they hadn't amended it.

Most of the vol will be the remaining baggers panicking over losing it - so not much sympathy there, plus our resident bingo boys which the DMAs are handling nicely.- they know theres a fair few jumpy PIs out there .

we don't get any further TR reductions and the other half of the Thursday dump was strop losses triggered - perfectly possible that 25% of PIs had stop losses on, especially possible that they were put on the hour before opening , then iis are at 45%.

2 things
1] There is some muscle behind the bod if opportunist predators are about
2] Pre-emption rights should apply.

M&G bought 9% just before the CLR - the iis aren't like day traders - slightly more patient and realise the potential.

And paying down the debt with 2m till May - they are actiually stronger - the amended loan has bought invaluable time so everyone can relax a bit and see if minor or major. They have alluded to cash management - thats why.

BTW, you could have and still can shift 500k at 6.9p for the last 3.5 hours.- to buy 7.89p.atm and alot of the time no price.

Thats your guide, not L2 - thats just to play the minnows

The good news about Reuters info is that it shows it is an accurate reflection of ii holdings.