Member Info for Jimzi

It ridicules itself if you can read. Ian, so little time to wait, why any commentary? Delay AGM for a week- not too difficult and all would understand and no need for a rns, which acc to Ivy and Jims posts is misleading. They just can’t stop RNSing and yes, it’s reckless - just keep quiet for a week ffs. Holders can be critical Ian and not be overly desperate to be positive - it ain’t a cult

Post of the century- love it 👍 todays AGM, however i have gained confidence in speaking to various members of the board today on the path forward and i have no doubt that they will not know the path we shall be following until the minutes are issued.

Cheers. So there’s actually no foundation for saying they are likely to want more data - the bod haven’t a clue? And we’re back to might or might not ( as it was an interrogation and not 2 way) I’m trying to reconcile this - it clearly is fundamental. Again , should be suspended with this man made opaque system - resume when it’s clear

Quite. Jim Bob , you said you’ve done this, tell us all about it

Ivy, now your saying its poss they might or might not want more data.- option 1 - in which case whats the RNS all about.

Frankly its a fiasco - the shares should be suspended until facts are relayed not cryptic messages in meetings that have minutes that aren;t minutes - btw, are there any real minutes in addition to the judgment minutes?

Why oh why give this running commentary - just keep quiet till you know.

but the whole point of meetings is to have two way communications - one party talking and the other saying nothing isn't a meeting - its a presentation.

Jimmy, perhaps you could tell us what does go on at these meetings

So logically, how do they know they require any more info.

Seems the meeting must be very one way as the FDA boys won't say anything - it seems incredulous - you have a meeting but don't say what you want but put it in minutes that aren't minutes.

Even Yes Minister was more clear.

cause since Feb 14th, they haven't supplied it so it wasn't down the back of the sofa [existing data not submitted] ergo its new data required

The mms are a bit pathetic really.

Can buy 10k at 9.47p - over 10k no quote. But they have 34k of sells to rinse.

More like a club than a market!

Ding ding - bingo round 3.

BOD turning into a joke - three RNSrs - this - worrying

Yep, I make it 25p - 20/80 - a mere 70% discount to NAV.

Give it time.

That said, no quote for 15k shares!

Still the most illiquid share on AIM

Glyco 13m, Proaxsis say 1m as a token value = 20m.

Cash sufficient till end of 2020 - no placing required gents.- and investments don't need any funds so just overhead.

And a couple of peeps sell - AIM investors

I fear that the costs of disposal will exceed the proceeds - given where it is , unless you find a buyer down the road.

Agree its a bit desparate Re old debts to get EBITDA positive - no one cares.

is right - this AMP disposal was not in accordance and additional to their scheduled repayments .

Slightly concerning and no reason given - and it should be RNS'd here and not there.

Results are not really important - SL plus tech = breakeven = standstill = mcap currently too high if nothing else happens. Any tech gains is gobbled up by salary increases.

They have to get that MOU converted prompto - many LTHs have pension holdings - and we are getting old!!

Yes but pressure won’t affect the FDA outcome. Sentiment maybe but the two are totally unrelated- but I’m sure some will cack themselves.

They ( the lenders) have a big foot on their throat. Chose to get rid of MTFB rather than POLX ( which looks interesting) as they have zero liquidity so had no choice. Got to go for the liquid one . At least we know the drop was Amp related.

well you can sell 500k at 7.25 so you can get out .

Buy price for that is a rip off.