They are prohibited from shorting but forward selling is not shorting - just a sell with T12 delivery This is what gives it away: (a) the average of five daily volume weighted average prices of the Ordinary Shares, during a specified period before the conversion date, rounded down to the next 1/10th of a penny.
Strange they don't say what a specified period is in the RNS.
40m is 3.5% of the current no of shares .
If they lent say £2m, they would have to have a sp of 5p min to get their dosh back given this limiting factor. Thats why they probably said 500ks the most we will lend - cause their repayment is dependent on the future sp
No its not really NT, they are trying to eake out some sells on no volume and paint an inaccurate picture. 15m with FDA - the holy grail - plus Mayo - V cheap in my book.
yes, that 3.5% clause looks like 500k was all Bergen was prepared to given them - too risky to get their cash back over this figure. I shall hold off buying a few more to see how things pan out.
parties have now agreed that convertible securities with a par value of £537,500 be purchased by the Investor for £500,000 in cash, To me it looks like 53,750,000 shares issued at 1p? [Par] Anyone know if correct?
Indeed rumb - I fear we are suffering a bit from covid must do something trading - bet no one realised or read what I was saying in my ProAxis post given lack of replies. If only some took 30 mins to actually find out about the company eh? And peeps now selling below placing price. Anyone notice some one bought nearly 2% of the co real time? Wink
Exactly Barwick A few crap themselves assuming the worst. Invesco managers are judged by their return- they may have been perfectly happy at 5.9% or whatever but when it goes up 6p, they decided to top slice a bit. Normal? How is 6 m in 6 weeks a dump Lord Henry. Your very excitable.
RE: Simply Wall Street - ORPH Share ownership9 Feb 2021 16:30
Now we know that it has not been Invesco pulling it down - thats only 6m for the last 6 weeks. There are a few traders with wedges playing - good luck to them but don't blame Invesco.
The problem gents is that while the msc model is great , you have to execute them with the right figures. SL a fair overhead contributor ( without Covid) but will never exceed this. HOC, better than nothing and that’s being generous. Tema, not in any sense transformational- v poor. The disingenuously written broker note ignoring the massive defect of transshipment thereby recking its “forecast” is worrying. This needs a clear GP rr of £5m plus to lift it out of the current crap and the warrant overhang. If they do it , I’ll be shocked but worth my small punt now at 50k at 3p
From advfn - plonk 2m on the ask - keeps the lid on as traders turn on each other - could explain the malaise - I'm sure Invesco would lend shares for some pin money!!
Interesting that shares on loan have seen quite a spike in January according to the Euroclear data. It was only 3m shares in total (month average), so less than 0.5% of share capital, but if the near 2m additional shares were sold into the market (i.e. supporting a short position) then it would be a bit of a headwind for the shareprice. Someone trying to front-run Invesco? Aug 0.7 (million shares on loan month average) Sep 1.0 Oct 1.0 Nov 0.9 Dec 1.2 Jan 3.1 hTtps://my.euroclear.com/apps/en/monthly-stock-loan-data.html#month=eq:1&year=eq:2021&limit=17&search=1&order=asc:abbreviation