RE: RE: RE: RE I2 Jul 2019 09:05
I am undecided with regards to contingency payments. They can be best avoided if Parsons does his job properly and at the same time, the prospective buyer(s) make us a decent enough offer. I'm not sure whoever the buyer(s) turns out to be, assuming we manage to find one (or more), will want a load of disgruntle PI's on its back, bombarding them with emails and phone calls.
The offer IMHO ideally needs to be based on what we have proved-up and take into consideration the greater potential from the assets, e.g. the Palaeozoic, which is where Brian and the exploration team will need to come into their own. There will undoubtedly be other factors that any would-be buyer will want to take into consideration. These could be:- the strategic location of where our assets are located, the 10 year tax break, the route to market (both the European and Moroccan gas markets), and the monetisation of the Te-5 Horst. There are many, many other reasons but those are just a few.
The radio silence from Sevenoaks continues and I only hope and trust this is a good sign and that a deal is being worked out that will benefit all parties. I'll be disappointed if we have to go long and continue with the drilling. I believe and always have done that the drilling should ideally be left to one of the "big boys". There needs to be multiple drilling, some 3D seismic, further analysis and interpretation of the 2D seismic data and deeper pockets to allow for enough time to be bought to unlock the full potential of the assets.