Member Info for JerseyCrew

And remember- this is just the main target - there are 7 other smaller surrounding targets!!!

I think the % is higher given we have CB at the helm!!

Objective: To assess the likelihood of successful mineral (gold) discovery at the Juno drill site following the 24 July 2025 RNS announcement by GEO Exploration Limited.

Evaluation Summary:-

Drill Depths: Planned between 750m and 1000m targeting high-response zones.

- Geophysical Indicators: Strong chargeability and resistivity anomalies aligned with magnetic and gravity models typical of IRGS-style mineralisation.

- ⁠Model Convergence: Unconstrained forward models converged over a coherent footprint of approximately 4km x 2km.-

- ⁠Historic Context: Prior drillhole (PHD001) terminated short of the modelled body but was proximal to mineralisation.-

- ⁠Licence Expansion: Additional licences granted in May 2025, expanding the project area to 450 square kilometers.

Estimated Success Rate: While quantitative metrics such as grams per tonne (g/t) or intercept lengths are not yet available (pending assay results), qualitative indicators suggest a high probability of success.

-

Geophysical alignment with known mineralisation patterns.-

Strategic licence expansion indicates confidence in the target.-

Modelled footprint supports large-scale mineral potential.

Estimated Success Rate: 80 to 90 percent probability of intersecting mineralised zones based on geophysical and geological modelling.

In respect of Juno and any newbies here that haven’t already done so - check out the previous RNSs and in particular May 8. The target in the tweet appears to be the largest central one - there are 7 surrounding targets as well!!

Recently posted by Omar:

Can't wait to get drilling on Juno

- Target footprint: ~4 km × 2 km, based on integrated 3D magnetic and gravity modelling

- Style: Intrusion-Related Gold System (IRGS)—same class as the Havieron deposit (+8Moz AuEq), which was modeled using similar techniques

The tweet also contains some excellent high resolution graphics of the target with aero magnetic and gravity together with historic holes and depths.

If posters irritate- filter. I think this stock and Callum will let the facts do the talking. Derampers have their work cut out for themselves here :-)

Everyone must have gone to bed with an early alarm set!

One of the assumptions is a prioritised service in Perth for the assays - worth it to get the news out and hopefully Omar agrees

Upbeat and hopefully informative Mickey - just posted my thoughts on possible drill timings: I might be very wrong but it is a starter for one with lots of base line assumptions including drill rate being in standard conditions - it might go faster or slower in reality: imeline (2025)

10 Aug – Pad & camp preparation begins.

~24 Aug – Pads & camp completed and rig arrives on site (co-ordinated mobilisation).

25–26 Aug – Rig set up on first pad.

27 Aug – Drilling commences (Hole 1).

Batch 1 (0–300 m)

7 Sep – 300 m reached; samples dispatched.

9 Sep – Samples arrive at Perth lab.

23 Sep – Assays returned.

24–26 Sep – First assay RNS (alteration/pathfinders, geological confirmation).

Batch 2 (300–600 m)

17 Sep – 600 m depth; samples dispatched.

19 Sep – Samples arrive at lab.

3 Oct – Assays returned.

6–8 Oct – Second assay RNS (deeper geology, vectoring evidence).

Batch 3 (600–1000 m)

~29 Sep – Target depth reached; final samples dispatched.

1 Oct – Samples arrive at lab.

15 Oct – Assays returned.

16–20 Oct – Major RNS with potential gold/copper results (headline intersections if present).

What's going banana's Mickey? General chat or anything specific? Lots of good posts

Haha - like it howezap :-)

Huge fan of GGP! Waste line not great either though in truth

This also might be of interest:

AI commentary on the fact that vertical holes are planned: • “Planned to be vertical” = straight down. Starting holes vertically is the simplest, lowest-risk way to:

• Calibrate depth to the important layers (cover, alteration top, intrusion margin).

• Keep the hole straighter and improve core quality (better for geology and assays).

• Make apples-to-apples comparisons between holes.

• What they’re aiming for. In an intrusion-related gold system (IRGS), gold often sits in veins around the edge of a hot intrusive body. A vertical hole gives a clean “column” through the system to find:

• Alteration (silica/sericite, potassic, skarn/hornfels if present),

• Sulphides (pyrite/arsenopyrite/chalcopyrite),

• Quartz–sulphide veining—the business end for gold.

• It doesn’t mean “only vertical forever.” “Planned” leaves room to wedge/deflect a hole near the target or add an angled (“scissor”) hole later if the geology calls for it. Vertical first; angle once they’ve confirmed where the contact/vein sets actually are.

• Practical takeaways for investors.

• Vertical = faster setup, lower mechanical risk, and clearer depth control on a deep first pass.

• Success signals to watch for in updates: mention of strong alteration, arsenopyrite/chalcopyrite with quartz veins, and good structural continuity—followed by assays (the only thing that confirms grade).

In short: they’re taking a disciplined, calibration-first approach—drill straight down to hit the depth window the models predict, prove the system, then adjust geometry if the rocks tell them to.

Sorry to sound like a broken record but there is a lot of good stuff being posted on TG the is hard to replicate here such as chart diagrams - here are the words being some technical analysis I did earlier today there: GEO — why I’m bullish right now (TA + near-term catalysts)

Coiled spring setup: After basing at 0.22–0.24p, price is now above the weekly EMA20 with rising volume. Structure mirrors classic “turn” behaviour.

Breakout trigger: A weekly close > 0.30p is the gate. Clear that and the chart points to 0.33–0.37p first, then 0.38–0.43p as an extension zone.

Momentum: RSI is pushing back toward the bullish 70 band = buyers in control.

Supports: 0.24p then 0.22p (where the base formed). As long as we hold that shelf, the uptrend case stays intact.

Backed by real catalysts (already in motion)

DDH1 appointed for maiden drilling at Juno (WA) — operational de-risking and a clear timetable to first holes.

Geophysics results released and being used to target drilling — tightens the hit probability.

Drill start + progress RNSs next (mobilisation → spud → on-hole updates if material).

First assays after lab turnaround (typically a few weeks post-submission) — hard newsflow lined up.

Phase-1 completion → follow-up plan (step-outs or additional holes) depending on results.

TL;DR: Chart says “ready to break” while drill and assay news are imminent. Above 0.30p opens 0.33–0.37p with a stretch to 0.38–0.43p if momentum and volume persist. DYOR / Not advice.

With apologies - I thought I was on the GEO site! I am a huge and long term GGP holder - I did not mean to post here!!

Some other posts to share tat might be of interest:

AI commentary on the fact that vertical holes are planned: • “Planned to be vertical” = straight down. Starting holes vertically is the simplest, lowest-risk way to:

• Calibrate depth to the important layers (cover, alteration top, intrusion margin).

• Keep the hole straighter and improve core quality (better for geology and assays).

• Make apples-to-apples comparisons between holes.

• What they’re aiming for. In an intrusion-related gold system (IRGS), gold often sits in veins around the edge of a hot intrusive body. A vertical hole gives a clean “column” through the system to find:

• Alteration (silica/sericite, potassic, skarn/hornfels if present),

• Sulphides (pyrite/arsenopyrite/chalcopyrite),

• Quartz–sulphide veining—the business end for gold.

• It doesn’t mean “only vertical forever.” “Planned” leaves room to wedge/deflect a hole near the target or add an angled (“scissor”) hole later if the geology calls for it. Vertical first; angle once they’ve confirmed where the contact/vein sets actually are.

• Practical takeaways for investors.

• Vertical = faster setup, lower mechanical risk, and clearer depth control on a deep first pass.

• Success signals to watch for in updates: mention of strong alteration, arsenopyrite/chalcopyrite with quartz veins, and good structural continuity—followed by assays (the only thing that confirms grade).

In short: they’re taking a disciplined, calibration-first approach—drill straight down to hit the depth window the models predict, prove the system, then adjust geometry if the rocks tell them to.

Sorry to sound like a broken record but there is a lot of good stuff being posted on TG the is hard to replicate here such as chart diagrams - here are the words being some technical analysis I did earlier today there: GEO — why I’m bullish right now (TA + near-term catalysts)

Coiled spring setup: After basing at 0.22–0.24p, price is now above the weekly EMA20 with rising volume. Structure mirrors classic “turn” behaviour.

Breakout trigger: A weekly close > 0.30p is the gate. Clear that and the chart points to 0.33–0.37p first, then 0.38–0.43p as an extension zone.

Momentum: RSI is pushing back toward the bullish 70 band = buyers in control.

Supports: 0.24p then 0.22p (where the base formed). As long as we hold that shelf, the uptrend case stays intact.

Backed by real catalysts (already in motion)

DDH1 appointed for maiden drilling at Juno (WA) — operational de-risking and a clear timetable to first holes.

Geophysics results released and being used to target drilling — tightens the hit probability.

Drill start + progress RNSs next (mobilisation → spud → on-hole updates if material).

First assays after lab turnaround (typically a few weeks post-submission) — hard newsflow lined up.

Phase-1 completion → follow-up plan (step-outs or additional holes) depending on results.

TL;DR: Chart says “ready to break” while drill and assay news are imminent. Above 0.30p opens 0.33–0.37p with a stretch to 0.38–0.43p if momentum and volume persist. DYOR / Not advice.

Just a reminder - Omar believes we have the potential to become a Billion Pound Plus company - that’s a 100 bags from here. He has done some maths to come up with that number !

AI commentary on the fact that vertical holes are planned: • “Planned to be vertical” = straight down. Starting holes vertically is the simplest, lowest-risk way to:

• Calibrate depth to the important layers (cover, alteration top, intrusion margin).

• Keep the hole straighter and improve core quality (better for geology and assays).

• Make apples-to-apples comparisons between holes.

• What they’re aiming for. In an intrusion-related gold system (IRGS), gold often sits in veins around the edge of a hot intrusive body. A vertical hole gives a clean “column” through the system to find:

• Alteration (silica/sericite, potassic, skarn/hornfels if present),

• Sulphides (pyrite/arsenopyrite/chalcopyrite),

• Quartz–sulphide veining—the business end for gold.

• It doesn’t mean “only vertical forever.” “Planned” leaves room to wedge/deflect a hole near the target or add an angled (“scissor”) hole later if the geology calls for it. Vertical first; angle once they’ve confirmed where the contact/vein sets actually are.

• Practical takeaways for investors.

• Vertical = faster setup, lower mechanical risk, and clearer depth control on a deep first pass.

• Success signals to watch for in updates: mention of strong alteration, arsenopyrite/chalcopyrite with quartz veins, and good structural continuity—followed by assays (the only thing that confirms grade).

In short: they’re taking a disciplined, calibration-first approach—drill straight down to hit the depth window the models predict, prove the system, then adjust geometry if the rocks tell them to.

Espen - are on you TG? Huge amounts of good stuff being posted. I have feet in both camps - one of the benefits of the TG group are rampers and derampers can quickly be banned if required - there is wide tolerance for exchanges of views but decorum is maintained