Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
It most likely doesn’t even need tweaking you moron.
Clearly paying you overtime for the weekend aren’t they.
The UK gov ship sailed a long time ago, validation using frozen pig saliva samples not suitable for validation of AffiDx (and other tests who noted this such as Mologic). The process is farcical and that is well known.
HUA imminent in Europe and APAC approvals due Q4. We all know that’s the key to unlocking the full sales potential of the LFT.
It’s already selling for professional use via Calibre and Avacta making direct sales. Plus Medusa part of the NHS microbiology framework to supply for professional use. So clearly there is no issue with selling when the UK gov can’t get their act together at PD.
Don’t just roll up here with your “LFT is a dud” speech with zero basis for it. The just add a bit of “Ava6000 could be good” to take the edge of your pathetic deramp attempts.
Just another fool peppering a bb with the same repetitive cr*p
Just before I put you in the green box as you’ve managed to wind me up within 3 posts…quite a feat! If you aren’t up to date with the various government fast lanes and backhanders - you keep thinking it’s all on price….they’re not looking for cheapest, they’re looking for where they get the most in return!
Even better MrRipley, this tweet shows the comments from AS in a presentation Q&A when asked about how the process of developing a new Affimer and updating the test works.
A man worried about variants wouldn’t say “our experience of variants thus far suggests we would not need to do this very often IF AT ALL”
Which is proven right so far! And plan b is very clear
https://mobile.twitter.com/YorkshirPuddin/status/1464248344990072856
Lol wyndrum you fool. You think Turkish companies will ask to be paid in a currency that is significantly devaluing?
They’ll be charging in EUR or USD and an equivalent price to whatever the rest of the market are charging. Then they have the purchasing power of those EUR and USD elsewhere.
You come up with some gems pal.
https://mobile.twitter.com/YorkshirPuddin/status/1461761963420225541
Can someone with access to a Bloomberg terminal confirm what I am seeing here. Heddle's Q321 holding of GGP showing 0 i.e. he was fully sold out. Yet Q421 holding now showing at 74.5m shares.
So he's been seriously accumulating the last few weeks!
Lol sirspread you really are a grade A numpty aren’t you!
Ahhh so mcmullank is underwater and bitter….which then clouds any ability to see the wood from the trees.
Makes sense now.
Just look at what a gold company on the cusp of production and free cash flow has fast tracked with a small placing at minimal dilution.
Apart from comms this is an impressive company. Although the poor comms even makes sense as they are just busy getting on with stuff!
Would depend on what value you got for the part sale versus the risk of receiving the cash.
I’d sell my car to fund the mortgage payment if someone offered me a premium to market value for it when there was only a 50/50 chance the money due to me would come in.
Then just go buy the car back (or another one) at market value. It’s a cost free way to hedge…as all good risk managers would do.
Appreciate your efforts though….
Agreed Jeff I think this is a sensible hedge against a worst case scenario. Rather than a “oh dear we’ve got no money left raise” Other projects are now basically decoupled and unreliant in the short term on Homease gold pour. Gives them some breathing room if elation plant needs some tweaking and done at minimal cost to shareholders.
Double shift to me suggests they’re now really going at it
Agreed. Another placing never ideal but it wasn’t at a discount (not that there is much left of a market cap to discount). Blyvoor we now know won’t be providing any near term cash so I’m fine with this is it facilitates some work getting done on Haneti ASAP!
Nickel at close to 10y highs, EV metals getting plenty of attention….
Let’s hope this is what finally gets something going!
Ohhhh Louis ….where do all these people come from who take part in the placings.
What a lifestyle company this man has made for himself!
Crook.
Response from Emma - looks like comms will improve:
“ Jake
I did not reply to you previously as the Company was in full discussion with Nomad and Loan Holder and also pushing on the Commission of the plant.
The Loan Holder has always supported the company and has not put the company into default ever as he wants the company to succeed.
We are almost there, but as is known in the mining world, Ghana is spoilt with major mining companies and their regulations offer no scale to distinguish between a major and a junior. As such it does take a junior twice as long to get through the hurdles.
When the Minerals Commission kept delaying the approval for Companies business plan to use the third party plant for elution, something I am still pushing on, we had to make the decision to build our own. something we never budgeted for out of the money raised.
To commission a plant in 6 weeks is a record somewhere I am sure. But we are fine tuning to get the process right.
Being kept in the dark is annoying as it is for me as I was tied with the Nomad.
Our comms will get better as we progress positively now.
Emma”
In case of interest I received this response from Emma to my (turns out poorly timed) email regarding no RNS.
“Good Morning Emma,
As we enter November, I note the 20th September RNS which set out the future payments of the renegotiated gold loan. October 2021 there was 5kg of gold due to AIMS.
I note that failure to pay is a defualt event:
"In the event that any payment is not made when due in accordance with the agreed repayment schedule, this will be deemed an event of default. Any interest that is not paid when due will accrue interest at the default rate of 17% until payment."
Can you please confirm whether the gold loan payment has been made or whether GRL have in fact defaulted on this payment? It would also be welcoming for shareholders to have an update on the progress with regards to the gold room (or 3rd party facility) which will facilitate the GRL gold pour.
I can only assume by the radio silence, that no gold has been poured from Homase and either default has taken place, or, gold has been purchased on the open market to make this payment. Either way, the company owes the shareholders the decency of an update here.
For a company that has a project with huge potential, at a late stage of development, it is incredibly frustrating that shareholders are kept completely in the dark with regards to progress on first gold pour.
I look forward to your repsonse”
New album, Side B, Track 2 - seems appropriate for LSE
Here we go with your 3-6 posts '1 month old dodge account' you won't last long here, believe me.... Spreading FUD - fear uncertainty and doubt - over the bulk underground, because that's essentially the only unknown left that such disingenuous posts can target.
Last year we had months and months of tecnhical FUD with the GreenTool and others - who said Havieron would never be economic... but here we are 12 months later with a gigantic starter deposit, a $50m decline going in, and $50m GGP cash funding to DFS, and a published phase 1 mine PFS to take to the bank ... so NCM can get ore to Telfer ASAP.
You may be able to confuse and scare the un-researched with your manipulation, but you cannot touch Bamps or me.
For the rest of you MrBig is a skilled and devious operator who last night was attempting to exploit an ostensibly clever argument. The posts were subsequently removed this am. For the correct reasons.
What he/she was trying to do last night was apply NCM's conservative, underground stoping phase 1 mine operational costs @ $84/tonne - actually $81/tonne according to GGP using the correct exchange rate to Bulk Underground production.
The first Stoping operation has naturally has lower volumes, due to the inherent volume limitations of the Stoping technique and higher costs - ore transport to surface limitation, requirement for drill and blast / explosives, and extra material handling, and subsequence labour in back pasting costs )
But you cannot apply this to the anticipated Bulk under ground block caving grades of the larger scale deposit where the cost per tonne would be circa $25-27/tonne
This is a totally and fundamentally inappropriate comparison made by BiggL - It's like comparing two completely different company cost structures, AND specifically designed to imply that anything under 1.5g is likely to be 'uneconomic'...
And It's total BS becuase we ALL know that Cadia is economic down to 0.4g/t Au... specifically due the bulk efficiencies of the operational costs.
And very much like comparing and interweaving the cost structure of building Ferraris directly to Ford Fiestas -
IE both make massive profits, BUT in TOTALLY different ways . Obviously You cannot make a profit building Ford fiestas in the way you build a Ferrari though. That would be loss making.
That's the best analogy I can come up with. And that is the tactic of this poster. Always Happy to smash them into touch.
Expect Multiple shorter accounts with a very obvious agenda.s
Regarding bulk underground : The only question is will this be a block cave or a more selective sub level cave...? Anyone with mining nouse can see that.. The grade in those breccia are nothing short of sensational. And a mine in their own right.
Icecool. I haven’t dug into the nitty gritty details of this but from previous research on this topic, a CE mark (to allow time for post Brexit transition) is acceptable for goods on the uk market until 2023 - dependent on certain criteria. The UKCA mark isn’t a necessity within those timeframes.
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/using-the-ukca-marking
“ The UKCA marking came into effect on 1 January 2021. However, to allow businesses time to adjust to the new requirements, you will still be able to use the CE marking until 1 January 2023 in most cases.”