Member Info for JDAU

QLW - one might suggest that confirmation is better than supposition..

Apologies, it's not over 500m... yet.

"The disseminated copper mineralisation, which commenced at a down hole depth of 110m, has continued to the current hole depth of 607m so we now have nearly 500m of mineralisation in this first drill hole which is very encouraging."

Just in case anyone needs this RNS translating/for the avoidance of doubt:

BRDD-20-001 showing continued mineralisation for over 500m so far is proof of concept:
http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/3902L_1-2021-1-12.pdf

CB doing a good job of keeping us lot informed - key points I'm taking from this RNS:

- Significant copper mineralisation commenced in drill hole BRDD-20-001 at a depth of 110m and continues to the current depth of the drill hole at 607m
- Drilling operations are progressing at a significant pace with drill hole BRDD-20-001 advancing at a rate of 80-90m per 24-hour period
-If drill hole BRDD-20-001 remains mineralised at the planned total depth of 815m, then drilling will continue until the mineralisation has been drilled through.

Ref: https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/XTR/bushranger-project-drilling-programme-update-pfvkiaoei6uxohp.html

Looking good..

NtM perhaps this would interest you: http://toworkorplay.com/play/traveller/hotel-reviews/blakes-hotel/

Found a Zebra in Kensington so I guess it looks like the stars are aligning... well, the planets at least...?

Remember to do your own research folks, you never know what you might find ;)

Looking good... and for what it's worth - for all our differences, have a good Christmas all!

The no. of shares / % declared would be the cumulative holdings of anyone holding shares via the given trading platform, to my knowledge.

NtM, that's a pretty odd comment at the end of your post.

You all seem pretty desperate to drag me into an argument...

Want my view that badly?

Ok, the company needs cash to develop it's assets at a good pace in order to increase their value/work towards potential sales: https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/XTR/issue-of-equity-01t8qcgwv89gslw.html

Due to Covid-19, there is uncertainty over timescales, it seems sensible to subsequently have the ABILITY to fund the company further should we need it, without tying ourselves to it - should we not: https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/XTR/funding-facility-ejpywjz1jvzb852.html

Add into the mix the, well I'll save my personal views... Tom Winnifrith and you have our current situation.
All I'm saying is it doesn't take a genius to work out who's going to be buying all these cheap shares now they've had the ... kicked out of them.

Painful to watch, but I'm happy to do just that from the sidelines.

PS. for clarity, my views on TW aside, the company has done a fund raise to steady the ship in turbulent times, I'm willing to cut them some slack as I don't think either of the setups are particularly bad and nothing has changed re the fundamentals I'm invested for.

To paint a simple picture of my view: we still have the assets, we're still progressing the assets, they will deliver significant cashflow compared to our Mcap.

You were trying to make the point that I was being inaccurate with my timescales by misrepresenting what I posted in order to try and discredit me. I don’t buy that it was a typo Andrew, because if it was a slip of the finger then why would you have been making that point? Why would you have been trying to make out that I was wrong with the rest of your statement?
- good attempt at a save but what you’re trying to use as an excuse doesn’t make sense... I think you actually meant “sorry, yes you’re right, I did make up that you said that to make you look bad so I could look like I know what I’m talking about.”

I said 3-4 months off the top of my head when I made the original post, the company has said 4 months.
My timescale accurately reflects what the company has stated.

I stand by the comment I made, I often feel like you make statements that are incorrect, misleading, or made up to suit your viewpoint and/or argument you are making.

The company has not once stated April for production, the company has stated 4 months build time for the plant from when equipment is on site.

You have fabricated this date based on your own lead times which are contrary to news releases by the company.

The above is, as clearly as I can verbalise, why I take issue with you.

You posted this: “I wont go down to JDAU’s level by accusing him of the same with his 2-3 months lead times.” - which isn’t an accurate representation of what I said.

You’re protesting about me suggesting you make things up / misrepresent things / change timelines to suit your agenda.

Just let that sink in.....

.. oh in fairness, if you also use the figures you’ve made up for the months taken to complete plant construction after delivery of equipment then your timeline makes more sense.

However, that’s not the guidance we’ve received from the company.

Whilst you’re obviously entitled to your opinion, I’m equally entitled to say “what you are posting posed as fact is fabricated and does not correlate to timelines we are being given by the company”.

Considering the “quality” of your research over the past few years, the extent of your mistakes re calculations and how often you seem to fill in the gaps by essentially making it up / adding months to deadlines as you see fit, I think I’ll pass and stick to my own notes, thanks.

To reiterate, your April critical path works back to a January receipt of equipment on site, which there’s no two ways about, you have made up.

Andrew, CB’s guidance has been 3-4 months to get the plant up and running from when gear arrives on site, i’m not sure why you’re saying April, sounds to me like you’re taking a complete punt and putting it across as fact.

Your fabricated “critical path” suggests no gear will get there before January post Covid lockdown.

DYOR people.

I don't know what to say... I'm not left surprised that the deal today differs from the deal set out specifically for the Fairbride asset at 20-23% based on PoG.

FYI Backtothesoil: https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/XTR/manica-hard-rock-collaboration-agreement-ghoo8qdt7s68ji6.html

They don't have "control of the whole of Manica" - we have a collaboration agreement with them.

Looking at the SP in the lead up to the date of the last planning consent meeting - it doesn't take a genius to work out a quick +50% might be on the table... IMHO, of course.

Happy to be a sounding board / back your group if you need a bit of extra clout (when I agree with your stance), however I don't have time to do the organising.. I've been a part of these sorts of groups before and to be honest, have found that I better use my time when I'm not in them (without any offence intended towards anyone, more at how useful I find these types of communities).