Member Info for jancux01

Especially for newcomers to the stock market: don’t let yourself get fooled by rampers trying to hype things up.

HUI carries a very high financial risk. Its current capital structure, lack of operational cash flow, absence of binding contracts, and reliance on potentially dilutive funding measures all point to a company in a state of critical financial dependency.

I've been in the markets long enough to know that not everything that glitters is gold, especially on AIM. When it comes to HUI, I’d urge folks to take a step back and look at the facts, not just the headlines. The company's last reported cash position was just over £266k, which frankly isn’t enough to keep any meaningful operation running for long. That’s not growth capital — it’s survival cash. The recent placing was no surprise, and to my eyes, it looked more like a lifeline than a launchpad.

There’s been a lot of talk around the MENA announcement, but if you read it carefully, it’s nothing more than a Heads of Terms — not a contract, not revenue, not even committed funding. It’s a non-binding expression of intent, and I’ve seen too many of those come to nothing over the years to get excited. You don’t value a business on what might happen someday.

Now, about the £3 million so-called loan backed by 50 million CEO shares — I’ve seen this type of thing before. When insiders are pledging massive share blocks just to raise bridge money, that’s not a signal of strength. That’s usually a red flag. If the share price slips, the dilution risk becomes very real. It doesn’t scream conviction to me — it whispers cash stress.

Some are trying to paint the Ohrid repayments as a strategic win. I don’t buy it. That money was already flagged in the annual report as necessary to keep the lights on, not as funding for expansion. If anything, that shows how thin things are stretched.

I’ve also noticed the share price movements around the time of the news and the placing. To me, it looked engineered — that familiar little spike just ahead of a raise, designed to support the offer. I’ve seen this playbook before, and it rarely ends well for retail.

In all honesty, I don’t see this as a story of growth. It looks more like a company trying to stay afloat, wrapping it all in PR to buy time. I’ve got nothing against ambition, but I do have a problem with smoke and mirrors. I’d advise anyone considering a punt here to read the RNS line by line, not just the headlines. Hope is not a strategy.

What are the arguments for still being invested in any kind of HW disaster at all?

Half the PHE forum has gathered here today. Exciting stuff!

Result: approx. 0.00167

WordSpaghetti acts like he’s the last honest trader in a sea of corruption, but he’s just yelling at candlesticks.

He posts so much he probably thinks RSI stands for “Ranting Spaghetti Intensity.”

Every price tick is a conspiracy, every seller is a traitor, and every buyer is him, obviously.

If forum spam could move markets, he'd already be in the FTSE 100.

Red bought @ 2.65p - I hope he's out again when I wrote sell sell. Or what do you think, Dusty?

Sure, just filter out anyone who’s critical of the mega-hype.

Anyone who got talked into HUI and bought in at 4 pence is screwed now.

I was curious whether there's any significant short interest in the stock at the moment. From what I can tell, there don’t appear to be any large disclosed short positions—certainly nothing above the 0.5% threshold that would show up on the UK register. Some of the tracking sites, like ShortData, also don’t list any meaningful short activity. The Financial Times mentions a general level of short interest that they categorize somewhere between low and medium, though they don't go into specifics. All in all, it doesn’t seem like the stock is under any notable short pressure right now. Of course, it’s possible that smaller positions exist below the reporting limit, but nothing stands out publicly at this stage.

I've been in the markets longer than some of you have been alive – and I've seen more schemes dressed up as "strategic partnerships" than I care to count. So when I see Howard White pulling double duty – Non-Executive Chairman of HUI and Director/shareholder of Ohrid Organics – my antennae go straight up.

Let me get this straight:

HUI – a company supposedly focused on hydrogen – suddenly acquires a 49% stake in a cannabis outfit (let's call it what it is) based in North Macedonia, and lo and behold, it's a company where Mr. White has skin in the game. And now he’s out giving glowing statements about how wonderfully Ohrid is doing and how expansion is imminent. Of course it is. That’s what they always say.

Back in my day, this was called self-dealing. You use shareholder funds to juice up a private interest, wrap it in a press release, and hope no one notices. I’ve seen companies sink because the people at the top forgot which hat they were supposed to be wearing – the fiduciary one, or the opportunistic one.

What’s worse, there’s hardly a whisper about governance controls, independent oversight, or any real risk assessment. We’re just expected to believe everything’s rosy because Mr. White says so? Sorry, but I don't take investment advice from someone trying to boost two ships with one paddle.

To those new to investing: look past the fluff. When the same man is praising the company your money just bought half of – and he personally owns part of it – you’re the one left holding the risk.

Wow, 170 posts of unrelenting Strong Buy optimism — impressive commitment! It’s like watching a motivational speaker trapped in a penny stock thread. I genuinely admire your ability to interpret every market wobble as “MM games” and every dip as “a gift.” If this thing ever goes above 5p, I expect a statue of you outside HUI HQ made entirely of RNS printouts.

And as for “never heard of you before” — sorry, I must’ve missed your TED Talk on advanced chart reading through the power of sheer belief. Stay strong, WordSpaghetti. The OO acquisition will surely save us all.

I understand that opinions differ—it's part of the market dynamic. I respect your conviction, especially as someone who's been in since the IPO. My comment wasn’t meant personally, just offering a different perspective.

We’ll see how things play out—perhaps you’re right, and there’s still a lot of upside ahead. Wishing you continued success either way!

Well now, I’ve been watching these Swazers posts go by for a while, and I must say — they’ve got all the hallmarks of someone who’s just a bit too sure of themselves. Back in my day, we called that putting the cart before the horse. There’s a lot of grand talk about IP strength and market positioning, but very little sign of real-world progress. Patents are only worth something if someone’s paying you for them — otherwise they’re just expensive wallpaper. And this idea that PHE is untouchable because of their modularity or strategic IP? Nonsense. The market doesn’t care how clever your structure is — it cares if you can deliver, on time and without burning cash like firewood in winter.

Also, this constant dismissal of HUI’s moves as irrelevant or “no threat” is the kind of arrogance that usually comes right before a rude awakening. Deals start with heads of terms. That’s how the world works. Just because they’re early-stage doesn’t mean they’re meaningless. And the attacks on people questioning the narrative? Calling them trolls or manipulators? That’s not how a serious person debates. When you’re really onto something, you let the results do the talking. No need to shout down every doubter like they kicked your dog.

Frankly, I’ve seen this all before — the bravado, the echo chamber, the insistence that this time it’s different. It usually isn’t. I’ll save my excitement for when they build something I can walk around and kick the tires on. Until then, I’ll keep reading — and shaking my head.

The high volatility, emotional forum dynamics, and lack of solid fundamentals suggest this is a highly speculative environment. It may suit short-term traders, but it's definitely not for long-term investors like myself. Good luck to those playing the swings.

The agreement is not yet binding (only Heads of Terms), and there are conditions and deadlines to be met. Many such preliminary agreements do not ultimately lead to final contracts – this should be taken into account.

The successful implementation is heavily dependent on third-party financing and the involvement of capable EPC partners.

Air pump, sell sell sell

Selling hurts, but watching it go to zero hurts more.

I suspect many of those poor sods can thank guys like our loadsadough and his ilk, who promote highly volatile penny stocks every day. In my opinion, anyone who falls for that has only themselves to blame.

Back in my day, we built things first and then made money. Now it’s all “modular hydrogen IPO ESG blah blah.” Stock’s flatter than my beer.

Castlepaul keeps yelling "PHE TO THE MOON!" — lad, you need a nap.

Loadsadough quoting Stan like it’s gospel — I knew a Stan once. He owed me 5 quid.

I’m too old for this. Gimme my beer.

Schwätzer - you’re acting like NH2, Bridgend, and the UHL IPO prove PHE is already winning. But where’s the money? Saying it’s “designed to scale” doesn’t mean it is scaling. One cheaper demo unit doesn’t mean the rest will be cheap or fast.

UHL IPO? That’s cool — but pre-revenue IPOs are a gamble. You can’t just copy their number and say PHE is worth £500M. That’s not how it works.

And calling Testpack3 out for using real numbers while you hype up “licensing potential” with no proof? Bit of a double standard, don’t you think?

If PHE’s tech is really that good, great — but don’t get mad when people ask where the actual cash is.