Member Info for jaf1948

Oldie,

The same people believe we are getting paid for our posts (I think the figure was $5-7). Logic tells me if that were true, I would be averaging 50 posts a day, not just over 1, but be that as it may.

Anyway, thanks for helping me get that 10,000,000 buy earlier today.....

mogwhy,

The sp has dropped from the 0.6s after the funding announcement to the 0.3s now. Do you really think anyone would put a negative comment on a bulletin board just in the hope that the sp might fall that little bit more ?

And why ?

Don't we wish ! Typo unfortunately.

Alas, the last trade was at £0.003695 but for 50,000 shares for a total of £184.70.

Alas, the last trade was at £0.03695 but for 50,000 shares for a total of £184.70.

Thanks, Kev. Your predictions of $40m EBITDA for WRES in 2019 look spot on as ever.

Jange,

I am sorry about your news but I cannot let GIT's earlier comment stand. He wrote 'The only people posting on here that I cannot abide are those who’s motives are clearly to get others to lose money and those who revel in other people’s distress'.

I no longer believe that WRES is a good investment due to the lack of production, the rising debt and its cash flow problem. Far from wanting people to lose money, I want current and prospective investors to be sure that they have read about both sides of the company instead of reading only positive posts. I have always posted that I want people to do well and have never rejoiced over anyone's losses, here or anywhere else.

I only post infrequently now but will continue to do so as long as is needed. If WRES is a success, I will be the first to congratulate the LTHs who have stayed here so long. But I do not 'bash' anyone or 'bash' WRES.

Why come onto a public bulletin board and then filter any views that disagree with your own ? All you are left with is other people saying exactly what you already think so what do you gain out of it apart from a warm feeling that you must be correct because no-one (you read) disagrees with you ?

Westh1,

I don't have a specific value for a re-entry point - I have two criteria that would need to be met first. I know this would mean I would not get in at the bottom but it would also substantially lower the risk.

The first is production rising consistently for a three month period. The second is seeing actual cost per ton being near to the figures that the company has quoted in its presentations.

Westh1,

I was in WRES for about 6 years but by the end I was trading it having lost confidence in MM's ability to deliver. I openly admit I have been negative on WRES for about 3 years now but I get tired of Troajan (especially but there are others) attributing quotes to me that I never made, and would never have made.

Yes I sold out.

No, I never said WRES would not get funding or not get the plant built.

Just admit you made it up or quote the actual posts.

Troajan,

I certainly never said anything about not getting funding or net getting the plant built. DB said he didn't either and Oldie was very positive at that time. So who exactly was it who said these things ? (If it was RealRealist, we already know he was a fake).

Production figures are important but costs are existential.

Kev,

I'm sure it was just an oversight on your part that you forgot to mention that those figures only apply when WRES reaches full production which is still some way off.

If you don't hold WRES shares, your comments don't count, says Tonlin ('I ignore those who have no interest here as your contribution is meaningless').

By the same logic, I can't comment on Arsenal unless I have a season ticket, and I can't criticise Johnson (if I vote Labour) or criticize Corbyn (if I vote Conservative). Does anyone else see a flaw in that logic ?

The reason I have cut down my posting on here is because at last people are being allowed to post issues of concern such as Masterman as a CEO, production volumes and Cash Flow without being immediately shouted down and abused. No one ever expected an individual poster to give a balanced view - it was only important that the board as a whole gives a balanced view which is starting to happen now.

You do realize that my post was a total satire ?

Why did WLFE fail ? Why is WRES underperforming ? I have been doing some digging on the Dark Web and have come across something called the Society for the Manipulation of Unwanted Tungsten (or SMUT for short). It is their job to maintain the amount of tungsten on the market thus optimizing their profits.

These companies never stood a chance.

The problem is, Kev, that over the past three years, the rampers have been consistently wrong about WRES but the trolls, as you call them, have been consistently right.

Didn’t you tell us that WRES would have $40m EBITDA in 2019 ?

Interesting divergence of opinion on trolls. Remember this dialogue from Blackadder 4:

Darling: So you see, Blackadder, Field Marshal Haig is most anxious to eliminate all these German spies.
Melchett: Filthy Hun weasels fighting their dirty underhand war!
Darling: And, fortunately, one of *our* spies--
Melchett: Splendid fellows, brave heroes, risking life and limb for Blighty!

Some of us feel that many of the uber-rampers are more worthy of the epithet 'troll' than those people who, up to now, have been more accurately forecast the progress (or otherwise) of WRES.

Oldie,

Great post, but please do something about that rickety-rackety bridge - it's keeping me awake at night.