RE: Cement29 Sep 2023 15:20
It’s been heading this way for last couple of years. Like seeing a slow motion car crash.
No sympathy, it was entirely their decision to continue with the dilution model even though everyone knew it was a slow well payed death March without a non dilutive liquidity event.
They have got themselves (and us) deep in the brown stuff now. Simple Bob talks about the benchmark and “flexing” 10% up or down. What does his financial model say for 65% below benchmark? Does he even have a proper model?
It’s the same theme continuing in these results. Admin Costs of over half a mill vs exploration cost of 220k
As I said and kept saying you can’t dilute heavily, then spend only a fraction of that on drilling and expect SP up to do well.
They had ample opportunity in the last few years to find a partner but they couldn’t because it was too early stage so they spun the BS about wantIng to keep more % for themselves then when that narrative wouldn’t hold water went out looking for a partner.
Only something truly transformational will give back any value to long suffering holders now.
Does anything here actually believe they are capable? I don’t, I think they are one of most incompetent boards i have seen because they either
Didn’t understand the damage to the SP their dilutive strategy would impose
Or
Chose to ignore the damage and carried on regardless doing more early stage exploration WHICH BOB HiMSELF HAS SAID DOES NOT IMPROVE MCAP
So their own strategy was to heavily dilute and spend most of that money on activities that will not help the SP
What were they thinking? Were they even thinking?
The market has been as bad as I can remember for this type of stock but it doesn’t excuse what they have and haven’t done