Member Info for Jackbal

A Couple of mill

Not coils mill

Apols

Hello Seingred,

Hope the crypto is paying you well.

It’s not that I don’t expect a painful raise but im gambling they won’t do it down here and give away half the co for coils mill.

I wouldn’t complain about 50 mill at 6 for 3 mill. I think the stock could recover a bit from that

Prob blow up in my stupid face

In spite of all the issues and imo thoroughly deserved criticisms I agree about 4 mill.

Lowest I’ve seen is 3.75, personally don’t think new lows will be seen unless they arrange catastrophic funding but always have the egg towel on standby

“I’m not in the business of burning bridges to satisfy the short term needs of shareholders”

Completely and utterly disconnected from us. Said previously he didn’t even see himself as a holder

“it’s going well from. Geological perspective if not from the markets perspective”

It’s so sickening to see him calling all the shots and acting like he’s the big expert when we have all seen enough him to know how he operates.

How can he not understand that the short term needs of shareholders are the same as the short term needs of OMI.

Seems like he couldn’t give a flying F about what % of the business he’s going to have to sell for his next lot of money.

Poor Old Mr I’ve got half a months salary invested in my own company. ffs

The only thing the market really needed to know was;

“can you confirm you will resolve Anza and put value back in the company before you dilute?”

The fact he wouldn’t offer that assurance (in light of his supposed 12 month cash runway) is just SO poor from our perspective.

Is he even confident of resolving it by end Q2 next year?

These clowns should be getting VOTED OUT.

It does seem that even with the voting block they can raise on AIM. The next question is will any private clients of Turner Pope be warned of this extra risk?

Once upon a time I wouldn’t have cared as much about voting rights on dual listed stocks. Another market lesson learned the hard way

They have obviously just blagged it at times and caused much confusion with the murky narrative.

He’s put his hands up to say he’s underperformed so why the 30k payrise and performance options?

He’s lost track of his own bs

Same old patronising attitude.

These things don’t happen in a week when it’s been almost 15 months from his own guidance.

So we are expected to believe that the law changed to such an extent that the JV on the primary asset became invalid.

I don’t remember seeing an rns to report such a price sensitive development

All I remember is Castro saying how “delighted” he was about the accelerated exploration activity we could look forward to.

Where was an rns to tell us true state of play so we could cut cloth accordingly?

He had to check himself in that one where he waxed lyrical about what a good destination Nigeria is for him to do business then later said how painful the process had been then corrected himself.

Careful with your BS Brad one day you will trip up badly

Agree Chicken and Break..

The absence of timeline to THE only event the market values resolution combined with rising costs and diminishing cash will keep the SP under pressure.

All the clever talk and promos and flagstaff talking AT US will not distract the market from dilutive confetti concerns or distract from where the real value resides.

Just because you have come out and admitted under performance it doest fix anything.

Better off just saying nothing and then out of the blue a resolution.

All his webinars just leave him wide open to even more criticism and Don’t help.

I’m annoyed with myself for watching the webinar. I knew it would almost certainly annoy me yet still I watched

Think again

Pulp Fiction says it best

“Bring out the gimp”

If nothing positive to update on Anza tomorrow it’s just pantomime and he’d do well to take into account every time he talks he makes it all worse.

He could save himself the bother and save us all from EVEN MORE frustration by saying nothing at all.

I’m not sure if they still read LSE after they have basically had all their BS called out and proven on this site but if they do read it

“DONT EVEN BOTHER UNTIL YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO TELL US ABOUT THE ACTUAL ASSET WE PUT OUR MONEY ON”

We don’t give a monkeys about these others without knowing what’s going on with ANZA

He’s like an awful magician trying to distract us from Anza with cheap tricks.

Cast your eyes at these JV’s while I make anza disappear

He can’t honestly believe that he can aell this to market as a “strategy”

“Let’s dilute Omi by approx 50% just for a couple of million to do even more early stage stuff on ground we just pegged on a different continent”

Surely not. Well I hope not anyway

If he thinks he can talk his way out of this and talk the sp up without the all important ANza factor he’s deluded

V interesting theory that holds water imo.

I agree that there is something suspicious around the refusal to enforce a JV or walk.

With a market cap of 3.75 mill he can’t hardl claim “it’s not a problem” unless he knows something about funding we don’t.

I think the factor that goes against the theory of Newmont providing funding is that Turner Pope seem to be getting more involved. He’s already done a lithium webinar so why a second one associated with TP?

Food for thought both ways. The way I see it is that the MOST important thing for the SP is that he provides reassurance to market that he will find an Anza resolution before he dilutes. That would put collective minds at rest for now and provide SP relief.

If this webinar comes to pass on Thursday without him providing guidance on how they can improve the mcap before diluting to fund other projects then the silence on that issue will imply a dilute at all costs strategy.

It’s almost a case of what he doesn’t say on Thursday for me

Waiting is all he can do Break imo as doubt he can afford to pay back 2 mill cash. He can’t force an issue if he can’t return the cash imo.

If he does get away with raising on AIM (think he will based on my research and nie Turner pope getting more involved)

Horrible dilution for us is positive dilution for him.

He knows if AIM holders get to vote he will without doubt he voted out but if he diluted the old vote into obscurity he can curry favour with the newbies he brings in to dilute the old.

Got to hand to him he’s played a blinder from his own financial perspective,

We’re now the ones over the barrel it seems

Well paid bod members (not aimed at paid up lse members)

Gla, sincerely

Ok Godo.

You know what I will take another few months off commenting here as you make a fair point without nonsense ramping.

Good luck to all, Bod owe something back to holders here after years of promises.

One of these legacy initiatives surely has to play out soon.

Good luck to everyone Including coyote.

Don’t like people losing money (it’s just that i like BS from well paid members even less)

They actually try and impose a very silly narrative that there is some sort of agenda against all of their great work.

Nobody in the market likes confetti dilution and that’s all they have been able to deliver so far yet they want to play victims.

The numbers say it all and they don’t lie. It was failure on legacy assets that made this uninvestable. Bob actually said clearly in an interview earlier this year that although he didn’t know exactly when the Turkish settlement would def be this year.

Wrong again Bob?

Pathetic and childish that they refuse to acknowledge it was an awful and mistaken strategy trying to impose an expensive and very early stage vast land package on an already bombed out skint explorer with little cash and a pfolio of legacy. This strategy would only work if they converted some of the pfolio to cash before we hit at least 2 billion shares.

And before anyone accuses me of being pathetic and childish myself you would do well to remember I’m not responsible for your money.