Member Info for Inthedark1

They could have made a public offer. As it is little shareholders paid a fortune for 2p shares

Facts

Swlc

"10 million in the bank"

We have paid a lot for that 10 million! And I repeat what will happen when the ads - which Met1 says are nothing to do with them - dry up?

We could be left floundering like dying fish in a little ox bow lake as fresh supplies dry up

DYOR

Will be available to snap up for 5p tomorrow. The warrant holders will be happy to sell them for 150% more than they paid for them.

Will the scam ads then disappear and will new buyers then stop flocking to buy?

Well just read his posts by clicking on his name and make your own mind up. He is not gentle with those that cross swords with him but the facts are there. And when critics accuse him of lying etc they can never back it up when asked to provide facts.

JS

You are significantly underwater and increasingly out of your depth

I have just read through all of LTI's posts this month. I would advise anyone thinking of spending their money to do likewise before acting.

You might care to read the RNS of Met1 too. And look at the share price of the company that Met1 has spent 1 million pounds on.

Clintek

Why do you have to be so rude? This is supposed to be a share chat forum. I was wondering whether it was sensible for Met1 to invest a million pounds in a company that doesn't appear - and I may be wrong - to be linked to its operations. If it is an investment in a business that won't be helping them in their mining then it struck me as odd. Discuss. Don't tell me "I am seeking to find negative elements". I am invested in Met1

I have lost money. I would like to make it back but I WILL NOT ramp a share or exaggerated or misleading others to suit my own ends. This is AIM, it is risky. I may lose more. But telling me to "move along buddy" is patronising and shows you have cloth ears. You aren't prepared to discuss the board's decisions. There may be really good reasons why they have done what they have done. What are they?

Should a million - not a billion!

JBatch

The reference, I believe, is to Met1 investing a billion in another business rather than a reference to the warrant holders reinvesting in Met1 after selling.

If you look at what you are suggesting - that warrant holders are selling, waiting for a fall and then buying back in why hasn't the SP gone back up to 50p. There has only been a slight fluctuation upwards after big drops. That could be down to new investors reading the ads and buying?

LTI

That is so crazy. Roll up, roll up give me 5p for 2p and I'll invest that 2p, not in finding something worth digging out of the ground and multiplying your investment many times over. No I'll spend that 5, now worth 2p on a punt on someone else's business that you could have bought.

It suggests to me they don't have confidence in heir prospecting business? And if they don't why should we?

Meg

😂

Miner1

And while we're at it I have read some very good posts on the LSE board for various companies over the years and some people's opinions are worth having, especially when sprinkled with a few facts. Meg is one of the most interesting posters on here.

Good luck with the shares but the more I look at the way this outfit are scattering our money about the more I fear they are spreading themselves too thinly rather than concentrating on the core business. I would genuinely like to hear what you Miner think about their strategy in relation to expenditure.

I watched the recent interview of two board members and thought the interviewer gave them a very soft ride. He didn't cut to the chase and he didn't question the warrant strategy or ask whether any Met1 staff stood to gain from the massive ad campaign that is ramping the shares and what they thought about that, or why they didn't issue an RNS warning the ads bore no relation to reality.

Miner1

I am sorry to say this but you do understand that what you are saying is completely illogical. You say "we need people like James" a man or a woman who says Met1 is a Ponzi scheme (his words) and the board are rubbish one moment and then says the opposite and starts spouting stuff about knowing objectionable people like the self confessed misogynist Andrew Tate.and about owning many millions of shares. The same man who a a few years ago was hoping to save enough money to take his family to Ibiza.

Then when Meg questions your praise for someone who is clearly not telling the truth about his trades you tell them "they don't get it".

I do get it. You have some Met1 shares and you are worried that they won't go up to either break even, make a small or a big profit, whatever, so you don't want to see criticism of someone who is shouting " it's going blue today, hurray".

But you are hitching yourself to the wrong horse. James is more of a donkey on his way to the knackers yard.

Zolander

Hang on a minute AI and James reached the end of his brick can't both be right. Jimmy said LTI and I are the same person.

Anyway surely JamesTrader71 and JS are one and the same. They write the same way.

Where is Laura 2022 and her ferocious alter ego Breaststrokes anyway?

We've not had any cup and handle, heading blue all the way with green boxes nonsense for some time.

I can't survive on JS' thin gruel for much longer.

Mind you - expect some Guinness fuelled tirade later 🙂

At the further risk of being identified as being LTI I feel I must defend him/her.

He is not clueless if he is telling the truth about not being invested in Met1. The vast majority of us who have invested and I use that word loosely have lost money.

Some might say it is better to roar like a lion than live like a mouse. But not if the lion is dead. And Met1 is, at the moment, looking more than a little bit lacklustre.

All of us with shares don't like this kind of talk but you have to see the funny side of it. And if JS, who has been extremely rude, even has a fiftieth of the shares he claims to own, then seeing Met1 turn up its prospecting toes would almost be worth it.

RUMP

No, you are incorrect. LTI is a Peruvian ring master, renowned for his work with taming Jaguars, he dabbles in non AIM shares but would never touch Met1 with a barge pole. He has many canal boats, barges and poles despite the mountains.

I am a seventh decade Englishwoman through and through. I do own Met1 shares because I like to take stupid risks. I am currently in my 5th foray into the ramped world of Met1.

If you are going to talk nonsense Rumpmounty so am I

LTI

JS shares

Almost all imaginary shares. Walter Mitty.

Although someone is stopping the fall to 2p and a fool is easily parted from their money....🤔

Pile not pole

Jimbo

Couldn't it just be that more suckers are coming in all the time courtesy of the misleading ads with the warrant holders selling into that glorious pole of naive incoming loot. So it edges up with the little buys from you and others and then drops drastically when the equity holders sell a big wodge of 2 p warrants with a 'thanks very much!'. I think it is.