Member Info for in4cedros

Gazza - just responding to other people’s tosh whilst we await the next milestone in the resurgence of this interesting small cap exploration play.

As a claimed significant shareholder I presume you agree Briggsy’s allegation is absolute tosh and should not have been posted.

Yes I have but she was a consenting adult and we both moved on without whinging, whining and disgruntlement - unlike a few on here!

You’re a very naughty boy for making that allegation - not surprised it was rapidly removed - surely you wouldn’t want to compound your losses by adding legal action to them!

JohnBriggs - alleging investment fraud is a new low for you - even from a desperate disgruntled loser unable to cite evidence as demonstrated by posting history.

JohnBriggs - alleging investment fraud is a new low for you - desperation from a disgruntled loser unable to evidence his allegation.

JohnBriggs - alleging investment fraud is a new low for you - desperation from a disgruntled loser unable to evidence his allegation.

Https://youtu.be/LRdI1azB6_M?si=D1Zm4lxq6BOX-f9B

GarryGraham - it’s taking you a long while to go through my historic posts to attempt to evidence the misinformation you posted about me!

I don’t mind, I’m happy to wait, in the meantime CEG is going about it’s business in the way they’ve set out to shareholders.It’s probably dawning on you that your rants against me are completely unfounded and if you’d have paid more attention to what I said, at the time, you would, at least been aware of the risk you were running and been comfortable with it, rather than blaming others!

Perhaps GarryGraham, from the “ Mean Streets Of Manchester ”, along with his consortium, might consider a day trip out to the IOM.

I’m sure Eytan would welcome a visit from such a committed shareholder!

How are you getter on with the cut n paste of my Pre - Perseverance posts Garry?

Druid - thanks for your consideration today - we don’t quite see the history through the same lens but I’m happy to be dormant sometimes unless I’m blatantly misrepresented!

GarryGraham - BTW thanks for valuing the considerable work I’ve done on this share - I’d say time spent was far more because some posts require detailed research and fact checking. Obviously some of my comments are merely an opinion but I usually make the difference clear.

I can’t alter the risk profile of this share - it’s a high risk AIM play and everyone should know that by now but I believe I’ve fairly represented that risk in my comments. I’ve also countered plenty of misinformation on here and the other channel. If you believe it’s all been for nothing that’s your prerogative- I’ve done it for my own gratification and will continue for as long as it suits me.

I mentioned fact checking earlier and I realise that’s rather challenging for you - how about starting with something that should be very easy for you, judging from your previous post - look back at my posts and point out any that you believe “ were ramping the **** out of BPC up to the drill “ then post them up on here!

GarryGraham - I’ve always been as supportive of the company as I can as there’s an over abundance of trolls on this share, many of whom spread misinformation, but you’re confused about by stance on the drill.

I decided not to participate in the Perseverance drill as it didn’t suit my risk appetite at that time. Prior to the drill I frequently referred to the COS, as published by the company. Even though I wouldn’t benefit I genuinely wished shareholders well.

I could see that, pre drill, finances were extremely tight and there appeared to be no safety margin. This was worsened by the last minute political challenge. The last minute borrowing was at lender of last resort rates!

Having said that the company was called Bahamas Petroleum for a reason and there were many shareholders who encouraged the company to pretty much pursue the drill and do whatever was necessary to achieve it.

If the drill had been successful all the questionable aspects would have been swiftly forgotten and the BOD would have been heralded more than Eytan is currently!

When the drill failed I genuinely believed the company would go under - the mystique and complications of the Trinidad assets IMO saved the company along with the willingness of the Aussies to gamble new money.

Shares are, however, all about the future prospects, rather than the past, although we all learn from history. THE FUTURES BRIGHT - it’s the Conjugate ORANGE Basin!

Briggsy - “ why on earth ” would YOU say that?

Druid -

A statement like “past performance is not indicative of future results” is actually mandated by the SEC in the marketing materials of financial institutions.12 Oct 2024

That’s a cut n paste from google but most investors have seen that sort of statement before. Clearly in the case of CEG many observers, including the disgruntled shareholder cohort, chose not to believe things might change for the better, from a pretty abysmal history!

Bbiguana - I would be amazed if the loss of turnover has any impact on SP bearing in mind the lack of profitability associated with that turnover.

That element of the business has been “ jam tomorrow ” for more than a decade but many initiatives have failed and they require management by a new organisation with cash and more importantly innovative new technology to have a chance of optimising profit. ( You’ll see the clause for CEG to profit from such success is triggered at 750 bopd , which would be a magnificent achievement for PRD ) .

CEG can now afford to clear the decks of assets that they struggle to develop and concentrate on Uruguay which is clearly flavour of the month with Super Majors. Having that Chevron cash in the bank gives them confidence to take the necessary action.

GarryGraham - reflecting further on your remarkable journey I’m truly awed - if you told me you were the inspiration for Chumbawamba’s most famous song I’d believe you!

GarryGraham - that quote is probably one of the most iconic in the history of CEG!

In it’s way it’s up there with Alan Hansen - “ you’ll never win anything with kids ” and Neville Chamberlain’s “ peace for our time ”.

On chat boards we live and die by our history - sometimes people need to acknowledge their mistakes and move on - if you can help Briggsy over his problem I’ll be as supportive as I can - you would make a good counsellor - you lost money on the same drill yet came through it, buying more stock, despite having great reservations about oil in Uruguay, getting a farm out and Eytan’s leadership - respect Garry!

Briggsy - I’m not the one who wrote, before the Chevron transformative announcement, but after Eytan had told us a farm out was being negotiated :-

“ Why on earth would anyone want to give their money to a company with no credibility and run by amateurs and most importantly who on earth would want to partner with them ”


Briggsy - I believe we can be pretty confident they’ll “ never be a retail shareholder value “ delivery for you as seemingly you sold out at a whopping loss that’s left you bitter and twisted for what feels like eons!

Regarding Simon Potter even if he was shipped out and brought home the bacon requirements elsewhere the saving to CEG wouldn’t be huge ( £50,000 pa last time I looked ) and they’d still need to find a NED to replace him and I’m not sure you’d get the vote with your record!

Good to see you focusing your ire on Potter - is it because you’ve realised Eytan has the Midas touch at the moment!

Roughntumble - many thanks for posting the link.

Briggsy you recently asked me about progress here and I replied at length. I now note, from the link, that the reprocessing on OFF-3 is now 90% complete, up from 75% in Eytan’s video. Who’s your favoured partner - you’ve seen my cheeky speculation?

Roughntumble - did they reply to your email - did it crash because it was overwhelmed by interest?