RE: Presentation11 Apr 2026 12:30
“ Ikn, apologies for the delay in responding. Like you, I have a good investment here and would like it to do well. You are a ‘make a quick buck’ investor (as you have fairly admitted) I am different in that I am genuinely interested in the company as I have been for many years and would prefer to see the people who have guided the company to a pivotal stage in its development have the satisfaction of seeing it through to a successful conclusion. I believe this would have happened, but due to a little impatience on the part of the our wealthy new investors the existing BOD will not be given that opportunity
I thought Jim and Pete answered the questions with honesty and openness. They agreed to assist with any transition to a new management team and have already requested that all team members continue to work as normal through any potential disruption during the transition. This is very decent and fair IMHO. PYC have a good reputation for the quality of their work and it is important that this level is maintained“
I’m not quite sure where I have stated I’m here for a “ quick buck “ ?
Impatience of wealthy new investors ? Not sure how wealthy these are or if this matters ? Having so much stock bought by a few individuals bodes well for existing investors as I’m sure they aren’t looking to lose their initial investment !
Answered questions openly and honestly ? Is that a case of they had no choice because others have invested a lot of money to question these publicly ? They seemed very disinterested indeed IMO and transitioning to others is exactly what paid members of a public listed company should do, so no applause from me.
Many years have past with very little change so imo a change is needed ( board members ), advisors cheaper than full time employees is another cracker from Jim etc…… another wage packet for the board members eh .