Member Info for Iknownuffin

Accusing a poster of being the Nomad is continuing the libellous ramblings 🙄….no end for complete nonsense from this 🤡

Leno, we shall prevail 🤝

tc, i’m not the one that keeps mentioning sep fella 😁

a few of you are keeping track of the time for such …not me, i’m very contented.

such a shame that most will disappear then, but let’s hope i can very much get in at the time my exact thoughts on most of you complete ****s 😁

to be fair i have called matrix a witch probably only one occasion, most of the other times is she is a complete **** 👍

that isn’t limited to the female form, absolutely could be used to call men the same 😁

as of the fact she should brush her hair and get up on personal hygiene etc again this isn’t sexist at all 😋

TC, let’s see shall we 🤭

someone to trust del - of course on a public chat board 🤣

failed lawyer - has no clue how the legal system works.

trying to scare investors with ownership of metals within the ground, when in fact this is common throughout the world.

subs own the mining rights - which are all bar one ( 80% ) wholly owned by eua.

absolute ****take that the smelly rats posts are up even at all.

Actually 1456 🤣🤣

maybe admin have seen obsessive behaviour with so many posts by a deluded, lying **** and delete 🤷‍♂️

The accusations and blatant libellous comments on here by a select few are staggering indeed.

Look forward to next few weeks when these silly, sad people are gone forever 🥱

EUA have followed the rules, irrespective of how folk feel they should have been told/seen etc.

Spik, I couldn’t give a toss what you think 👍

Clear notes/video is available for all to see so posting purposeful false information would be futile.

Either way look at the wording for both cases and it’s clear as day for myself, how you take it for your money is your issue 👍

3) for those who state that the litigation doesn't affect anything, think again, of course it does. You have to remember that Board members are effectively glorified sales men, they are there to sell their company and its products. Do you believe everything a salesman tells you every time you go to purchase something? of course not, for example, you only have to think about estate agents! ha ha! The Board will tell you what they want to tell you, but it isn't necessarily the real truth of what will happen. Too many see Board's as a God, they are not.

You will find the biggest shareholders 🤝

1) the current market cap stands at £78.61m. The whole company could be bought for that right now or less, because it's probably not even worth that. There's no revenue, so there's nothing to be gained from it for anyone, that's partly why no one has bought it.

No it cannot unless enough shares were bought for a takeover OR the company was put up for sale ..

Another thick comment

matrix, i will let all posters search your posting history on how you put the court cases and chances of winning ….stop being thick as **** ffs ….go have a gander everyone 🤗

chess, ****off ffs 🤦‍♂️ …what a load of nonsense 🤣🤣

folio, eua first time around from under 1p -42p is a good starter but complete immaterial anyway to a sale of assets so let them spread nonsense , as if any ****er is listening 🤣

company sp - asset valuation are completely different.

ctc, you want to spread *******s continually on this board be prepared to be called a complete **** as your purposeful with fabrication which is quite bizarre when you hold stock 🤣🤣👏

Spike,

There's a question here about why did the board not earlier informe shareholders with the two court cases were lodged against the EUA,

and why no mention is made in the annual report regarding this, or what is the worst case scenario?

Well, first of all, the Logik case is settled, and it was not discussed or announced in detail, simply because it was not material to the business of the company at this point.

And with respect to the Queeld and my spare action, this relates to the reissue of shared certificates where the shareholders say they have been lost from its place.

When a company reissues a shared certificate, it is obliged to ensure that such shares are issued to the true owner.

Furthermore, to protect all the shareholders, the company and the registrar seeks an indemnity where it feels it is required.

It is not possible, obviously, for me to comment further in advance of the court case to be heard in November.

This is exact words from CS , think we have crossed wires in which case here.

But with Q&M, he very much simplifies exactly what the case is and only is.

spike, duck the legal case question ? i think you need to listen again spreading *******s !!! he clearly said they were not put out there as it was thought they weren’t material ….in other words the legal teams were very much adamant they weren’t to lose these thus keep it in house 🤝

Oh dear the lawyer is working on a Sunday 🤭