Member Info for IKFA

As its got to this ridiculous childish level can we not just take a "starting from now" approach like a "silence in the courtyard" game?

Why wait until next week? Lets just say if you are not mentioned FROM NOW then you agree to leave us in peace?

Digitalis, you are absolutely right, that was the original invite.

Just noise as usual.

😂😂 We will know straight away, you will be the only one under 35, with a cheap suit and a fake Rolex on.

That’s if you even get past registration where you have to validate your forum user account…. Remember the application process? Using someone’s profile name who stated they couldn’t attend won’t work 🙈

Yes I believe there are a few on here who got lucky in the draw.

If there are any questions you want asking please post on here, I know others have also offered but I would also be happy to pass your questions along.

You remember Motive Fuels…… funny that as it was before your time Fishy.

Maybe it was one of your previous log ins which was shut down that remembers that time. I reckon if we look back along the timeline we find that RickSanchez was kicked out about 3 days before you appeared here.

If it walks like a duck.

Let me try again, you really don’t seem to understand the concept of % rises or you are just deflecting away from the point which you were trying to make, that there were no buyers….. There are buyers hence the stock has risen recently from 26p to 74p.

Buyers result in rising prices.

Are you with me so far?

Is that a serious answer?

Maybe you should check your own fingers, and if they have any link to any brain cells you do have.

Low prices stocks or high priced stock is irrelevant, the percentage is the one to consider and a rising price shows there are buyers.

Sounds like you have had a tough day, might be best leaving it.

So how has the price move from 26p to 74p? Fairies and Unicorns?

Maybe I have a misunderstanding of markets but I thought more buyers than sellers = a rise in the price?

Funny that, I have heard a worse bluff on this little forum, so for it to be “the worst bluff you have ever heard” suggests you don’t get let out into the real world very often. Do they keep you locked up in your little cupboard with no exposure to the outside world?

To comment on the holdings of, and ability to buy of a contributor who you know nothing about just shows yet again your true colours. How often do you state “you know nothing about me”? When you are called out.

For someone who tries to convince others that they are a genuine holder, while continuously bashing the stock, the industry, the company and more personally the CEO.

Biggest bluffer award goes to you fish boy.

😂 says the fish who cashes out every time it rises. You must hold more shares than Linde way you keep selling.

Kettle pot black

Would they know Charles Woodburn? Would they know Emma Walmsley ?

Totally irrelevant garbage as usual.

Not from its rise from being a pioneer in mobile tech to the biggest company in the FTSE 100 in 15 years it didn't.

Deflection as always.

We are seeing multiple posts which are trying to paint a negative position on the progress of ITM, and although we all know the motivations behind this, we need to get some perspective. As we know it is always the little dog who yaps the loudest.

ITM is a pioneer in this fledgling market, with 20 years experience already of research and development. This R&D, experience, product testing has to be paid for, which of course most on here understand.

This is being paid for by Investors, who buy shares in the company because they believe this company will grow, and in the future provide them with a positive return on their capital. These investors have bought shares at 26p / 55p / 72p and all the way beyond 600p. £250,000,000 of the money, most of which remains in ITM bank accounts was allocated against a share price of 400p, by institutional investors who have way more information available to them about the inner workings of ITM than we ever will. They believed then, and one would assume still now that this investment will provide them with a positive return on their capital, and probably access to tech which their company will benefit from. So we are not expecting to see massive revenue figures right now, we are not expecting ITM to turn a profit yet which is why we are not concerned about our holdings and are not selling.

This group are clear on their intentions, and would be open in their support for the company.

Then we have other groups, traders who are happy to see volatility and try to profit from the short term movements in price and could certainly benefit from a little spreading of fear from time to time.

Then we have the "shorts", whose sole aim is to see the demise of the company, and see their profits rise from each single 1p drop of the stock. The thing which is causing a massive headache for this group is the volume, there is no volume so although the price has fallen and they would love to get out, but they can't. So the more noise they can create, the more questions they can stir they think they are winning. Sorry for them that ( not at all ) that the price has risen 44p since the lows, and with 23,000,000 shares to buy back that's a lot of headaches.

This got me thinking about an example to show the addicted poster how irrelevant all of this key tapping is.

Lets consider Vodafone, a pioneer in a new market which the mobile phone industry was back in the 80's ( when I assume our friend wasn't even a twinkle in his mothers eye ).

https://www.vodafone.co.uk/newscentre/features/vodafone-at-40-industry-firsts/

Vodafone was a technical pioneer, and rose to the top of the FTSE 100 in 15 years......... just let that sink in.

This is clear evidence of a company confident in its position, confident in its product and confident of the future. They have a strong pool of investors who have invested at significant premiums and have not moved when the share price was significantly lower than the current price. There are only a certain number of shares which are on the table at these prices, as most holders are confident in their investment. If we didn't sell at 26p, with increased orders and revenue since why would we sell at 70p?

Those who need to buy back the shares are worried, very worried hence their post count rising every day and sounding more desperate. From 26p the largest short has lost £179,000 of their imaginary profit for every 1p rise in the stock, this must hurt, alongside the constant need to service this debt. They couldn't exit at that price and now are using every trick they can think of to find some selling volume.

For me the FACT that volume is higher on positive days and lower on negative days tells us that the fear that they are trying to create is failing. More investors are trying to get on the bus than trying to "jump ship".

At least you admit you have pasted it rather than come up with it yourself. Your "research dept" seem to be working overtime.

What you fail to consider here is that stock prices have a large element of "forward projection" and take into account revenue which will be expected in the future. Also you place zero value on the very valuable IP which ITM posses through their world leading technology.

Do you remember when Tesla Shares went through the roof when they sold like 2 cars a quarter?

Also remember there are not 617,000,0000 shares in circulation, there are actually 640,000,000 shares in circulation right now due to borrowing and selling to attempt to drive the price down.

I won't even comment on the "steaks" which that poster has available for sale, but I would be prepared to have a flutter on them not being of the ITM long variety.

We can all select the information which we want to to make our argument, "fact" is that you grasp at straws to spread your misleading information.

Fact: 52 week low 25.08p

Fact: Current Price 74.52p

Fact: Return from low 49.44p

Fact: 197.12% return from low.

Bearing in mind when we were at the low price of 25.08 you predicted it to go below 20p, now following those returns you are trying to suggest the share price is "choking" is a little misleading to say the least.

Well at least one complaint already into the FCA, your posting history is free for all to see, it is in the public domain. If you are happy that there is nothing that could be construed as "market abuse" then you crack on pal.

I for one will be putting together a clear view of why I believe you are trying to influence the market by spreading false and misleading information and then we will see where it takes us.

I am all for filtering out the waste of everyones time, but that's exactly what he wants, because then he gets free reign over all of the new users and investors to spread his bile and influence those who can be influenced.

We are a thorn in his side, he knows he can't influence us to give up our shares, but if he gets unfiltered access to the casual browser who is thinking of investing, or considering moving their investment elsewhere then he has a captive market to carry out the instructions of his paymasters and they win.

It used to be a good discussion on here, where information was shared and we could have a grown up conversation and it is a shame that it has been ruined.

How someone is continuously allowed to spread fear, without revealing their intention is completely wrong, especially when they are so blatant about it. Trying to claim they are a genuine investor in one sentence, then doing everything they can to discredit the company, its workforce and in particular the CEO the next should be held to account as it is plain as day they have specific intentions. Again read the text below the message when you are making a post on here.....

"Important Message from the Financial Conduct Authority

Posting inside information that is not public knowledge, or information that is false or misleading, may constitute market abuse. This could lead to an unlimited fine and up to seven years in prison. If you have any information, concerns or queries about market abuse click here."

I am actually considering spending a few hours going through the claims which have been made, and if I can justify sharing my concerns to the FCA about "market abuse"

There will definitely be no insider information, but the opportunity to look at the factory, get a feel for activity and ask questions of the key representatives is a great sign that the company are confident in their direction of travel.