Member Info for Ibug

ian aged 12
Ever wondered where those 57m shares came from? Don't get fooled.

HH1AN2
Which is why Adrian never supplies links to his videos/pictures because he would have been shown up for the fraud that he is. Amazing how many times his camera has failed to work or needs charging. Or we get a picture of a tanker on site but he can never get to the gate which is just down the road to capture it leaving. I'll leave the rest to your imagination as well. All smoke and mirrors and the OGA do not tell porkies about the production. They provide accurate figures. I would rather trust Kaa than any of the eyes. Proof of the pudding not often supplied. Pipe, smoke it.
Only 2 posts lost in the last clean out.

Speak Turkish?

2 sites good for research

https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/ilanlar
https://www.enerjigunlugu.net/

"The chief executive, George Lucan, said the market was attributing little value to hydrocarbon reserves in general, or in the prospects for the Saltfleetby Gas Field:

“In the light of this and the interest expressed by other energy market participants, we think it in the best interests of shareholders to conduct this strategic review and formal sale process.”"

Just goes to show that our own posters know sweet FA when it comes to gas imo.

N66 BKP ™
@N66BKP
·
18m
Change of Plan today! 3 Loads of Rain Water for me to
@SouthernWater
and
@N33BKP
is on
@UKOGlistedonAIM
duty!

Monday Funday! ??

Will we actually get to see what they are carrying today? I have only seen 2 leave the site online carrying oil this year. We have had reports of others, some vacuum trailers, some with no markings, plenty going in but only 2 carrying oil coming out. Gregg confirms 2 in 1 day so that takes the confirmed total to 3 for the month so far. Definitely the old tanker trick being played imo. Shame we have to wait so long to get real figures.

My prediction for October is under 90 bopd.

Gove was the one that did the dirty. He is also a Surrey MP. Good luck with that decision.

Didn't take long for Hunt to rear its ugly head as I intimated last week. That was always going to be on the cards.

It would help if posters could not get Recovered planning appeals and Called-in decisions confused. Loxley is a Recovered planning appeal. "A recovered appeal is one where instead of an inspector making the decision, he or she will write a report that will make a recommendation on how the appeal should be determined. This will then be passed to the secretary of state to make the decision, taking into account the inspector’s recommendation."

Nowhere does it say "the IOW want the application called In by tHe secretary of State." This is just something made up.

How long or how many of those 220+ posts will take to disappear? One trick pony at it again.

I bet Adrian can't explain the flow rates and how and when the introduction of water into the reservoir, changes to optimise flow rates and production facility upgrade have affected the figures.

month bopd
Mar 20 181
Apr 20 243
May 20 183
Jun 20 158
Jul 20 122
Aug 20 128
Sep 20 93
Oct 20 47
Nov 20 101
Dec 20 82
Jan 21 102
Feb 21 99
Mar 21 105
Apr 21 101
May 21 100
Jun 21 95
Jul 21 92
Aug 21 82
Sep 21 45

No way are they going to get 300 bopd after they start reinjection imo. Shame on him for "The OGA figures are incorrect ". Nothing wrong with the figures. It is just the brain that can't process the truth.

Which is probably why the report said "Regarding the likely reserves of oil, it should be noted that policy guidance does not refer to a ceiling level or a minimum level of minerals that a development proposal should deliver."

Wizard
On what grounds would the IOW decision be "called in"?

"Reason:
The proposed development would cause significant harm to the landscape and visual qualities of the surrounding rural area and thereby compromise the Island’s tourism industry. The economic benefits of the proposed development would not outweigh the harm to the integrity of the Island’s landscape and Biosphere status. SP4. SP5, DM2, DM12."

Finch decision now well overdue considering other verdicts are being passed down in just over 3 weeks.

Stockraiser
Think what you want. I couldn't possibly comment considering it was the "Loxley recovery by SoS" thread.

northfork
You do realise that Mike was only a Planning Inspector and not a Judge. He may have decided it was all too difficult to call and passed it up especially when other policy decisions were being made during that period.

Or not so soon.

Called-in applications
The Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities has the power to take over (‘call in’) planning applications rather than letting the local authority decide. The secretary of state will normally only do this if the application conflicts with national policy in important ways, or is nationally significant.

He or she has to take published government policy into account when deciding whether or not to call in a planning application, and when making the decision. If the secretary of state decides to call in a planning application, an inspector is appointed to carry out an inquiry into the proposal. The secretary of state has to take the inspector’s findings into account when making the decision.

wizard
Not sure where you get your reduced costs from. Care to explain how they have reduced the costs? I could say I saw 3 ships a sailing by every day and not be able to prove it. Or I saw 2 tankers but no evidence of them coming out actually carrying oil. When a driver says 3/4 tankers a week on twitter he's not far off. Production must have really fallen off in September as all the work was done in August according to the eyes in early December on this board. It is quite easy to check back on the ones that haven't already been deleted.

I did like this one posted at the time.

"Adrian
I can't wait for the production figures for September. 40 or 50 bopd is my guess. Works were never carried out in August that affected production. They may have been getting the site ready for the works being carried out in September. The flow rates are consistent with a gradual decline.
bopd
Mar 21 105
Apr 21 101
May 21 100
Jun 21 95
Jul 21 92
Aug 21 82

Have you got data to suggest otherwise or is it going to be more hot air?"
If anything they will have gone up with fuel costs and increased retention costs for drivers.

It is one thing "supporting reservoir pressure" but how about replacing the 200k barrels of liquids already taken out of the reservoir? There are other fields in the area that tanker the water produced away.

I did say between 40 and 50 bopd for September. I wonder what the excuses will be? Camera jammed. Bad weather. Poor eyesight. Bunch of porkies.

Reporting Period Month Name August
Reporting Period Year 2021

Oil Production Mass (tonnes) 340.10
Oil Production Volume (m3) 402.00
Oil Production volume (mb/d) 0.08
Oil production density (Kg/m3) 846.00

Associated gas production mass (tonnes) 7.09
Associated Gas Production Volume (MMscf/d) 0.01
Associated Gas Production Volume (ksm3) 7.00
Associated Gas Production density (kg/sm3) 1.07

Gas Flared - Volume (Ksm3) 7.00
Gas Flared - Density (Kg/sm3) 1.07
Gas Flared - Non Hydrocarbon (%) 4.50

Water production volume (ksm3) 160.00
Water production volume (mb/d) 0.03

Month bopd
May 21 100
Jun 21 95
Jul 21 92
Aug 21 82
Sep 21 45

Bet they didn't see this coming unlike some of us who believe some of the RNS's.

Field Production Data, PPRS (WGS84): HORSE HILL
Field region LAND
Reporting unit name HORSE HILL
Reporting Unit Type Code T
Reporting Unit Type Description Onshore Oil Field
Operator Organisation Group UK OIL & GAS PLC
Onshore,Offshore Flag Onshore
Reporting Period in yyyymm format 202109
Reporting Period Month 09
Reporting Period Month Name September
Reporting Period Year 2021
Oil Production Mass (tonnes) 181.00
Oil Production Volume (m3) 214.00
Oil Production volume (mb/d) 0.04
Oil production density (Kg/m3) 846.00
Dry gas production mass (tonnes) 0.00
Dry gas production volume (ksm3) 0.00
Dry Gas Production volume (MMscf/d) 0.00
Dry Gas Production Density (kg/sm3) 0.00
Associated gas production mass (tonnes) 3.97
Associated Gas Production Volume (MMscf/d) 0.00
Associated Gas Production Volume (ksm3) 4.00
Associated Gas Production density (kg/sm3) 1.07
Gas Condensate mass (tonnes) 0.00
Gas condensate volume (ksm3) 0.00
Gas condensate volume (mb/d) 0.00
Gas condensate density (kg/sm3) 0.00
Gas Flared - Volume (Ksm3) 4.00
Gas Flared - Density (Kg/sm3) 1.07
Gas Flared - Non Hydrocarbon (%) 4.50
Gas Vented - Volume (Ksm3) 0.00
Gas Vented - Density (Kg/sm3) 0.00
Gas Vented - Non Hydrocarbon (%) 0.00
Injected water volume (m3) 0.00
Injected water volume (mb/d) 0.00
Water production volume (ksm3) 80.00
Water production volume (mb/d) 0.02
Reinjected produced water volume (m3) 0.00
Zoom to

Mirasol
2024. You are havin a laff.
Raise the money for drilling and get remaining permissions/permits. Testing period. Any gas is flared during testing. Then go back to SCC for planning permission (possibly x 2 then appeal). 2027 earliest imo.

London-based Barclays, the world's leading financial group, revised its oil price forecasts. In the report prepared by the organization, the average price expectation for Brent oil for 2022 was maintained as 80 dollars. 
OPEC+ WILL BE DIFFICULT ON THE TARGET OF PRODUCTION INCREASE
Barclays analysts explained that while raising the OPEC+ production target, it will likely struggle to meet the target due to members including Nigeria, Angola and Libya, which are facing difficulties in increasing production. It was underlined that actual increased supplies are likely to be much smaller, similar to Omicron's demand effect. Kaynak: Barclays’in petrol fiyat beklentisi 80 dolar