Member Info for Ibug

Pboo
They are called augers but calling them rigs is easier for the likes of you. How are the net curtains selling? You seem to spend a lot of time on here for someone who is not invested.

wizard
They never found gas at HH-1 when they drilled it. No gas was found when they did the first test at HH-1. The smaller flare was put on site because the all singing and dancing one would not operate at the low gas production limits.
Believe what you want. It does not affect the SP the same as all the other BS spouted on here does. Bottom dollar is that this is just a trading share and too may long term losers are stuck here all twitter and bisted.

Pboo
What are you doing here? You don't hold shares, or so you say and yet you keep sticking your nose in.
Perhaps you should look at @davethedrill1 twitter account and identify the rig. There wasn't one.
The wording in the RNS says "now", not 2 months ago.
" the Company has now installed three, shallow, groundwater monitoring boreholes at its 85.635% owned producing oil field."
Carry on selling your net curtains as you add nothing here.

10t a day permitted. HH is producing under 6t a month. It is not surprising they had to get a smaller flare in. Next step down will be a Bunsen burner.
PS They have never produced enough gas for a gas generator capable of powering the site even during the EWT when gas produced was at its highest.

ZYX098

Ian is the only person who would probably know. My great grandfather died when I was 3. It was my grandfather that told me. (family history lecture)

https://wessexcoastgeology.soton.ac.uk/index.htm#List-of-Webpages

ZYX098
I just can't help a bit of sarcasm. My great grandfather "quarried" oil from the Kimmeridge before moving on the quarrying limestone for real.

Ocelot
Adrian sold up, missed the last spike and is spitting tacks and probably told postman pat to keep his mouth shut. Unfortunately for him SS has let the cat out of the bag first.

wizard
There is no correlation of that happening if you view the production of oil and water figures since production started or since the said it.
Why do you believe everything the BoD say rather than think for yourself? Lemmings.

ZYX098
They will also need to take into account how much it would cost them for the extra water and the treating of it to the same quality as that produced otherwise the greenies will be all over them.

I wonder how the eyes missed all this drilling at HH and it has crept in under the radar? I'm surprised Adrian didn't announce it as "work has started on the injector" or was he in the pub?

Bcarm
Do you think the RNS will include details of when they are going to start building a road to the site? Something sadly missing at the moment.

I wonder how long it will be before the boreholes will show signs of seeping oil?

I see SS is doing an "Ocelot". It's as if they have already drilled the well at Loxley.

2021 Other Cost of Sales (1,067)
Will cut by about 25%.

Be wary about what UKOG say. " which can help improve ultimate oil recovery"
The injector well is in the opposite direction of the producing well. There is a fault line between the two.
If you take 75 barrels of oil and water out but only put back 25 barrels of water how does that help? Think about it and don't get conned.

Works out at just over £4,000 a waste tanker.

At last. Some real news.

and "For general working capital purposes." normally and whatever else they think they can get away with.

I shall add this now so you know where to search for the in influx of Planning Applications after the 2nd March when the request for the Judicial Review for Loxley is turned down.

https://planning.surreycc.gov.uk/Search/Advanced

Bcarm
Not that old chestnut. Must be your lucky day. It will be cheaper next week.

Bcarm
What did you expect from a company that does all those disgusting things to Turkeys over Christmas. Even Harold is hanging his head in shame.