Member Info for Ibug

No relevance to UKOG whatsoever imo as none of UKOG sites have have available space for any form of gas.

But 70 of my posts have been deleted. Guess he got his wish.

Account still here

https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/ells_valexpert/

This is a "No operations associated with the well site compound shall take place unless" condition.

"8) No operations associated with the well site compound shall take place unless and until the proposed access road within the site including its junction with High Loxley Road, any highway works at the junction of High Loxley Road and Dunsfold Road and any carriageway widening works on High Loxley Road between the site access and the junction of High Loxley Road and Dunsfold Road have been constructed in accordance with the scheme approved pursuant to condition 7(a). No other development shall begin before the junction works and the new access road within the site have been completed in accordance with the approved scheme."

I can never work out why some look so far ahead when they haven't even jumped the first of many hurdles. Apart from trying to lure the mug punters in what is the point. Guess it is just an imaginary Warren buffet game they play in their own minds. Sad.

Only 5 weeks till end of Q1 and the Annuals. How well is the Turkey drill doing?

Ocelot
They obviously have not taken into account the countless Planning Applications they will need to get passed by SCC before they can even start.
This is the first of about 14.

"Highways, Traffic and Access
7) a. No development shall commence until a scheme has been submitted to and approved by the County Planning Authority (including the entering into of an agreement under s. 278 of the Highways Act 1980) for the carrying out and completion of the proposed access road within the site, including its junction with High Loxley Road, any highway works at the junction of High Loxley Road and Dunsfold Road and any carriageway widening works on High Loxley Road between the site access and the junction of High Loxley Road and Dunsfold Road (“the Initial Highway Works”). The junction of the site and High Loxley Road shall be provided with 2.4m x 70m visibility splays in both the leading and trailing traffic directions in accordance with drawing number LTP/3134/03/05.01 REV B dated 10 October 2018 and, thereafter, the visibility splays shall be kept permanently clear of any obstruction above 0.6m high. Any works to the highway necessary to accommodate the development hereby permitted shall use flush set concrete retainers incorporating a ribbed surface to demarcate the edge of the carriageway.
b. No development shall commence until an agreement under s.278 of the Highways Act 1980 (in such form as may be agreed with the County highways authority) has been entered into providing for the permanent closure of the site access onto High Loxley Road, the full reinstatement of any curbs and verges, the removal of the highway works at the junction of High Loxley Road and Dunsfold Road and any carriageway widening works on High Loxley Road between the site access and the junction of High Loxley Road and Dunsfold Road and the full reinstatement of the highway, and providing for such works to be undertaken prior to the expiry of the time specified in condition 4 for the duration of the planning permission."

Aptly named Pratts corner and scene of many protests.
There are many similar phrased conditions such as "No development shall commence".

https://www.google.com/finance/quote/UKOG:LON?hl=en&hl=en

Perfect end to a perfect day!

And there you have it. One day of posts to drag you in and mug you off. Unbelievable. Never catch a falling knife.

ocelot
What about the % loss from the farm out you are always going on about?

You have a possible Judicial review to go through.
You have umpteen planning conditions to pass.
Even if they find gas you have to back and get EA, CC and NSTA approvals until they come out of your ears and you still bang on about your fantasies.
You have more chance of finding gold at the bottom of a rainbow.

ZYX098
It is all academic if they can't get all the Planning Conditions passed. Look how long it took to get the ones for HH through. It dragged on just short of 2 years.

False flag post by Mullins. I was caught out as well as a number of UKOG meetings have been held at Woking and I didn't read the article. This is the problem when some will post anything without reading it.

It is Woking borough council so has no bearing on UKOG as they are Reigate.

Looks like elle is ignoring the March Finch assault. I wonder why. Has it caught him out?

https://www.wealdactiongroup.org.uk/2023/02/high-court-to-hear-dunsfold-judicial-review-request-on-2-march/

Makes you wonder why they withdrew this application.

https://planning.surreycc.gov.uk/Planning/Display/SCC%20Ref%202019/0108

That would certainly slow down the 14 conditions outstanding for Loxley if the Govt. had to take over.

Challenge to Surrey gas drilling goes to court

Opponents of plans to explore for gas near the Surrey village of Dunsfold take their case to the Royal Courts of Justice next week.

Full story here;

https://drillordrop.com/2023/02/22/challenge-to-surrey-gas-drilling-goes-to-court/

SS also failed to mention the 8 or so Planning Conditions applied by the Inspector before work can commence on Loxley-1. One of them included road works at the infamous Pratts corner. Not sure how many of those conditions will have to go before the full planning committee. No doubt we will find out idc.

SS forgot to mention this as well.

"High Court to hear Dunsfold judicial review request on 2 March
On 2 March, campaigners from Protect Dunsfold and Waverley Borough Council will be at the High Court, asking the Court to allow a judicial review of the decision by the government in June 2022 to permit exploration for gas in Dunsfold. Surrey County Council’s planning committee had twice rejected this project.

The opposition to UKOG has come from Borough and County Councillors of different ‘stripes’, local residents’ groups like Protect Dunsfold and Don’t Drill Dunsfold, supported by Waverley Friends of the Earth, the Weald Action Group and Extinction Rebellion. The national campaign organisation the Good Law Project is supporting Protect Dunsfold in its legal case.

Campaigner will be outside the High Court in London on the morning of 2 March to demonstrate solidarity in opposition to this project and our determination to work together with and in support of those who can imagine a better future."

SS up to his normal tricks. Conoco did not find any gas.

"Conoco drilled Alford-1 on trend to the east on a separate closure in 1986. This well was dry, but it is believed that it was not drilled on a valid closure, but rather a structural nose."

"Smart money is flowing into natural gas contracts hence I see a nice return here within months."
Months? More like years. helps if you read the CPR where they expect 1st production in 2026 if they even find any. Who in the name of G is going to bet on a contract before they even do an EWT?

Ocelot
It is probably because you sound just like "Martin Frederick Collyer".

Only elle could post a link promoted by the dissidents to the proposed Loxley site. Perfect.