Member Info for HypeHero

Refresh their page on the official stock exchange site at 7. It will be a good few minutes ahead of everything else .

Mezza I think there is a group that are very questionable yes. And by questionable I mean we have hard data that says they are associated.

A leaner THG post-demerger can focus on scaling its high-margin beauty and nutrition segments.

THG's Ingenuity division demerger unlocks value, allowing investors to better assess the growth potential of its core e-commerce business.

Stevebot.Sleep(1000000000000);

LSE are on to him - hes on the watchlist.

There was 1 post yesterday compared to an average of around 20 per day recently.

I am reasonably confident the FUD+BUY at the bottoms theory is correct. He is strapped in for the ride now so no need to post incessant nonsense all day.

L2 isn't looking pretty but L3, L4 and L5 are looking 🚀🚀🚀

Based on my research I don't expect to see the fruit of some of the efficiencies into the accounts until spring summer so whatever drops this week is just the opening position. Material ebitda uplifts should follow*

*Unless it's spent on giving every employee a Cong.

Interestingly remain co cut around 17m of staff cost over the back six months of the year looking into some research on opex between the two etc.

Cut costs, simple as.

Our resident expert Steve did say this is leaky and the price would move into the results accordingly.

Think polish was just getting a bit of subtle FUD in tbh

The only possible outcome of a conf call is Matt putting his foot in his mouth.

Are you getting that from how it describes THG? My assumption was because that is true at the time of publication but isn't for the period of reporting.

That kills that conversation for a bit

This was my point. The bottom line will still be reported as old THG because that is how the group operated for the reporting period.

Obviously 🍆💆‍♂️'s have to be 🍆💆‍♂️s though.

I have in great detail.

Thanks Paul 👌

Cheers Paul, as ever angry speculation and nothing based on facts or logic or reason.

Thought - is there an assumption that these results will be for remain co? Given the actual, legal split was only recently shouldn't these be a typical TU and it will be the next one that reflects remain co?