Member Info for honestbob

So they should be able to say Mr Farage you are not our customer we have no personal information about you.

Either way SAR timescale supposed to be thirty days - accept they may have a few more than usual - but his at least might be prioritised to put the matter to bed and move on.

Dragging it out otherwise could lead to unfounded suspicion that there is a hope that to do so would lead to loss of interest.

I fear that would be to underestimate Mr Farage once more.

Wonder why it is complex when he was not a Natwest customer - but was with Coutts

I do remember Trev02 amongst other things he used to get very cross if posts he thought unworthy were recommended. Which predictably led to a flurry of recommendations. Which made him even crosser

Brent

Take your point and accept need feasibility study etc

I think my point is that (and jo may have in hand) that ideally prior to more drilling etc be ideal if Jo

has indication from would be finance provider (s) what level of resources etc need be demonstrated

for them to come on board. We have seen I think twenty years plus of increasing amounts of resources being shown

I like car analogy and as previously indicated take comfort from Juno willingness to swap debt for equity together with involvement Irish firm (whose name escapes me) both of whom should have good grasp of overall position.

Hope so but i think ten or fifteen year operating m one possibly better than 30 year one that doesn't get off drawing board. With company running out finance in meantime

However look at it must be in ranking for most drill holes per acre in the uk.

Unless a lender has said demonstrate xyz amongst other conditions and we will lend - I struggle to understand benefit of burning cash and diluting in the hope that ever increasing known resources will make it more attractive.

I may do Jo am injustice but in my simple mind need find what lender or lenders actually want to be prepared to lend.

If can't find lender or alternate willing to finance with an indication as to their probable requirements would suggest old guard approach was better - effectively mothball minimise costs and look for buyer.

I am afraid I have to agree with Slingizmo

More and more drilling - leading to larger known resources etc - but nothing coming out of the ground

All well and good in the days of the old regime who didnt draw salaries and as such company costs modest .

Would be interesting to know how much resources Jo feels need to be located before production can actually commence and finance be sought.

Different now

On positive note encouraging that Juno exchanging debt for equity - which seems to me to show confidence.

When Alison Rose told BBC journalist that Nigel Farage being debanked by Coutts for failing criteria (we now know other reasons too) unless she guessed she had the information from somewhere.

If Coutts had discussed with her not impossible given Nigel Farage profile that they or she had briefed the Bank chairman.

I think this has a bit further run yet - Nigel Farage I think has a subject access report awaited from NatWest itself which may shed light.

She had to leave due to her foolishness. Which the Bank said was wrong and was talking about reducing her bonus for

If the chairman now thinks otherwise he have stood up to the politicians and if felt unable to do that resigned in her support.

I wouldn't personally use share huzz turn of phrase, but would be very disappointed if Mr B does not soon show something more for his time at the company, than a large wage bill and more sample holes.

Parys must be one of the most drilled locations on the planet.

If there is not enough information now to interest

a lender will there ever be?

Yes - she has

I believe there is still a subject access report due from NatWest itself. (as oppposed to the earlier Coutts one) which might make interesting reading.

Fundamental requirement for any member of Bank Staff is total confidentiality as regards customer affairs.

If as appears possible Alison has breached this her position must be tenuous.

Speaking cynically of course that would not meet the latent demand for staff wages!

The apparent latent investors demand could have been satisfied before now by them simply buying the shares I would have thought

Difficult to draw a conclusion other than this furtherdilution is to top up the staff salary pot ready for when the last one runs out

For goodness sake Jo demonstrate some progress

Alison show some real leadership

Sort this out and stop the Banks name being dragged through the mud

I really am not clever enough to understand the full ramifications of Granesberg. However the old guard who bought into it clearly where - they were men of massive mining experience and deal makers.

Sadly Parys did not progess at all quickly in their custodian ship for a multitude of reasons.

I have odd feeling that Granesberg a bit like premium bond has and will sit there for a long time but potentially one day deliver a reward far in excess of its purchase price.

Either that or like the premium bond it might not pay out at all.

TBH anything that comes from there I view as a bonus.

I have been away for a while

Quick glimpse of board shows numerous references to your illness - whilst I often disagree with your postings I hope you recover soon.

You are quite right That is one of the downsides and why I am looking at it carefully

Must admit I am looking at Thungela Mining but I am undecided - there are some big pluses - huge dividend for a start but also several negatives