Member Info for Hexam

“How you can bash a keyboard and say it doesn’t work is beyond me.”

Well, that’s not a surprise as quite a lot seems to be beyond you. For instance I haven’t said it doesn’t work. I have said that they haven’t proven yet that it does - that’s the whole point of the user testing after all!

Put it this way, if there was any merit in what you or KK say then the sp would be at least 7p already rather than languishing at 0.7p. The sp is the only ‘FACT’ that really matters and says all that needs to be said about how proven their methods currently are.

Exactly, what they have is a direction of travel what they are trying to come up with is a strategic plan. When they have one it will be published and be very clear what it is - they might even communicate it via a Capital Markets Day!

In the meantime I note they have dropped any mention of a ‘credible plan’ post Frasers vote.

So Bfd can tell us what their strategy is all he likes but I’d rather it came from the company.

Finally something we agree on - I do disagree 🙂

“Finlay has sign posted his strategy. Up to you if you believe in it or not.

They also stated that the strategic review is still ongoing”

Can’t you see the inconsistency in these two statements?

Btw - I don't think this board is toxic. Mainly it's just posters telling it how it is but you're just unable to see it.

"My comment relates to posts not posters."

Well, that's even dumber then as well over 10% of the posts on this board are from you!!

"Luckily I've filtered one of them and would filter the other if I didn't find him mildly amusing"

Sums up pretty well why I haven't filtered you - yet. It's particularly amusing (and ironic) to see how many times you tell other people what a sad life they have...

"Name a board which is worse Hexam"

ARB for starters. Almost every post there has been negative for over a year now as the company stumbles towards oblivion.

Awaiting the names of over 45 posters on this board who are short.. (or well over 100 really if you look back further than just today).

The original poster was referring to shorts here - not posts. The posts here are predominantly negative because of the appalling company performance and share price collapse over the last few years. It would be very odd if this board was positive overall - now THAT would be blindness!

“80%, it's more like over 90%.”

I see it’s ‘make up a silly number day’ today and then make up an even sillier one.

There are at least five posters today alone that are invested so if it is over 90% who are short where are the 45+ posters who are short?

It’s also not the most troll dominated board on LSE but it does have some of the dumbest comments.

Why not go the whole hog? £10 soon and over 105% of posters are short. Sorted.

Yes, but he may genuinely believe it SCB even though you, I and plenty of others think it a silly number. I just found much of the video an embarrassment and that was just one of those bits that was.

"Imo their most recent video of Dan was market abuse lying about the value of debenhams on record£

I probably wouldn't go that far - CEO's often talk up the value of their business - sometimes ludicrously so. It was certainly one of the cringiest videos I've seen though and hardly filled me confidence let alone inspiration.

Hopefully his actions are better than his words (and his way of delivering them).

“Shorts must be wetting themselves with laughter that they can cause these kind of drops on no volume”

Why do keep making stuff up like this and stating it like it’s fact? You have no evidence. You see the price falling and the volume and just come up with a reason that suits your narrative.

The low volumes are just as likely to represent lack of interest and the fall in share price just being the MM’s searching around for a price to get some more interest (which, incidentally, is their job).

Same with the ‘credible plan’. You state what it is with certainty even though the company hasn’t and instead talk about a business review that has only just started.

No wonder nobody takes you seriously anymore.

"The beauty of the 5p and 10p options, is that is shows the board and staff fully expect the share price to be much much higher than option price"

Then why don't they buy now at 0.64p rather than waiting to buy for 5p or 10p? I feel like we are going round in circles but you seemingly can't provide an answer to that obvious question.

How many more times. I’m not talking just about FG.

This company is much more about pure belief than most others are so why should investors be expected to back up their belief by investing when none of those much closer to the business have?

If you can’t answer that question then fine - or you can just keep deflecting about CEO pay etc. Many CEO hold tons of shares given to them but still buy more.

And who are these “many others working with QBT have millions of shares.” Plenty have options to buy in the future (at a much higher price) but how many own them now?

What’s that? Not listening to Bfd?

That might explain why you haven’t answered it properly yet.

To sum up it seems NOBODY in the company (not just FG) has bought any shares in QBT despite it hovering around 0.7p for quite some time?

That doesn’t shout their confidence to me in the sp growing much - let alone to 5p and 10p.

"Hexam, who really cares about a closed period?"

Clearly Jamdooogle does as he is the one using it as a (false) excuse for defending the options which he bangs on about almost daily.

"Why would anyone buy more shares when they own at least 30,000,000?"

So he won't take advantage of the options either then as he has enough already?

He can well afford more shares so why not buy some at these ridiculously cheap prices if it is such easy money? Why has nobody else 'inside' bought?

This is what would show real confidence, not waiting for the options to come into play at much higher prices.

You can't answer so as usual deflect.

"That’s the thing KK, they mislead at every opportunity which is why anything they post is pointless."

No Doogle/Jambone. That's seems to be very much your role on this board, constantly spamming it with spins of the PRNs etc. into things they don't say and claiming things as facts that are either unknown or untrue (e.g. closed period). You were the same as Jambone and got banned for it then but obviously haven't learnt your lesson.

They are not in a closed period Dooogle - I thought we had already established that? They certainly haven’t been in a closed period for all of the last three years have they!

When did FG last purchase? And did he purchase those shares at all? When did the other directors buy. Have they?

The options are put up as ‘proof’ that those that have them have confidence but it seems odd that none are buying currently despite them being able to get them much, much cheaper now than when those options prices are hit.

A response which isn’t misleading that gives a possible explanation why they aren’t buying now at such cheap prices would be welcome.

If they believe in the company so much then why wait until 5p (or 10p) when they can buy now at around 0.7p? So why aren’t FG and the rest buying now (or at any time previously)?

They are missing out on 4.3p (or 9.3p growth) - a six bagger (or thirteen bagger) before they even get to the strike price of the options. They can’t be THAT confident?