RE: Back over 10p29 Dec 2022 11:23
"Watch how quickly they reply to my post, the same folks that were saying this has no chance of surviving, no shame some lol."
Well I tried not to reply at all but there are just so many lies/misleading statements in your post that it's too much to resist.
"Now it’s one of the few miners that are guaranteed to survive the next 12 months." - Untrue. They MAY have enough cash now if BTC stays around this level (we don't know for sure as we have seen no financials since mid-year). But if BTC rises a lot we know they will be OK and if it falls a lot they won't survive (without more funds).
"they have a very strong balance sheet" - Really? Then what's your idea of a weak one? By my reckoning assets are less than liabilities which doesn't sound strong to me at all let alone 'very strong'. Happy to see any analysis that shows that I am wrong and the company isn't probably, technically insolvent at the moment but none have been forthcoming so far. Any takers?
"They should be breaking even at around 20,000 btc now" - Would be really interested to see your calculations to see how on Earth you got to that conclusion. Unless of course you mean they 'should' but they are not. Even on a cash basis they need BTC at around $30k whilst on a profit basis they need over $40k.
"the same folks that were saying this has no chance of surviving" - hope you're not including the likes of me and HC in that as it would be a straight out lie. We were both clear they wouldn't survive unless they got funding - and they did get funding so they survived. Is that really too hard to understand?
The rest of your post is conjecture but of course you could be right and there is no doubt the company is in a better position than a few days ago - just still not a great one in my view.