Member Info for HenryHistorian

@Feeks: Une petite redaction: "Bonne chance".

As a lover of the French language and son of a grammar school teacher I couldn't resist.

@MaryBr190: I thought so too but am still waiting.

@FlyingHigher: I completely agree with your last sentence "Nanoco got shafted and tried to frame it as positive"

This is what infuriates past/present shareholders - the previous signalling/messaging by Nanoco/Edison, the settlement achieved and afterwards the arrogant./standoffish attitute and "communication" (or should I say LACK of communication) of Brian Tenner and Nanoco towards retail investors.

@LordWM: Once LOAM starts buying in big quantities, once Brian Tenner and others buy in big quantities than maybe there is a whiff of a chance of Nanoco turning the corner - so far no sign of this.

Just being a voice of caution here as with Nanoco too many promises were made in the past.

@Xenon: No one has ever doubted the ability of Nanoco to do first rate research but unless tangible monetary profits result out of this than this will not cut any ice with investors I am afraid.

Not being negative here but as a. Investor a good monetary return is my priority.

@TerrorWit: You are ridiculous - do you know this?? Your so-called cooling RNS was published AFTER the first RNS regarding that a settlement had been achieved. Brian Tenner did nothing, absolutely nothing to cool expectations - quite on the contrary he was stoking expectations whenever he had the chance.

TerrorWit or is it really you Brian (?): Anyone who has followed Nanoco knows how retail investors were misled by Brian Tenner - THAT IS THE SIMPLE TRUTH!

@TerrorWit; You have it so wrong. There are risks around litigation that is correct and everyone is aware of them. However the odds were in favour of Nanoco - that is also clear.

I don't resent the settlement - what I and others resent is the fact that having taken the risk of litigation we saw Brian Tenner settling for a paltry sum - a sum that didn't even was sufficient to result in the placing price of 36p at which Nanoco chose to lure in retail investors.

@NGR: May I remind you that Brian Tenner was loudly sounding off that he would only agree to a settlement that would result in "multiples" of current value in one or two video presentations. So if by multiples was meant halfing the share price than Tenner kept his promise.

Again, I am disgruntled that the CEO gave clear promises around the settlement and kept none. If you don't intend to keep your promise than don't make one - if you do than stick to your "red lines"...

@TwoGood2Die: Exactly- and thank you for citing past Edison “research”.

I think an individual called Brian Tenner also said something about “two imminent inflection points” in Nanoco’s value - I guess if Brian Tenner meant the share price collapse of Nanoco he got that entirely right.

@NGR: I use past behaviour and statements as my yardstick whether to trust a person and institution.

Under this method I wouldn’t touch or get near Nanoco or Brian Tenner or Edison for that matter.

The trust has gone.

@TerrorWit: I listened very carefully to what Brian Tenner had to say and read past Edison reports several times - all I can say loud and clearly to retail investors:

DO NOT TRUST BRIAN TENNER AND DO NOT TRUST EDISON REPORTS.

I mean well.

@TerrorWit and all others: DO NOT TRUST EDISON REPORTS. They are not even worth the paper that they are written on.

I and others trusted Edison research and as it turned out they were miles and miles off the mark - so do take everything they publish with a big pinch of salt.

I see that some people try to up/boos Nanoco or to be more specific its CEO Brian Tenner (BT).

All I can say is that BT had repeatedly and I believe deliberately misled investors and has clearly not honoured the engagements/promises he made to them in connection to the Samsung settlement.

I am sure that many people still recall that he assured us in a video presentatin that he will only agree to a settlement that represents mutiples of current value and that this settlement would present fair compensation for lost past and future business etc - clearly the settlement he signed off was nothing what he made out to be and certainly not multiples of value.

It is because of this that the share price has cratered - and BT will not win back the trust of the retail investors he has misled - and I will not even address the shameful and woeful communication (one cannot even call it such) by BT and the company afterwards.

Two major inflection points …yes Tenner it truly was a major inflection point south.

@Troublesome: The CEO has systematically misled investors prior to his capitulation to Samsung. Communication post capitulation to Samsung showed the contempt BT has for investors.

No thanks anyone still believing in the CEO needs his head examined.

I tendered - I cannot be bothered any longer with a deceitful CEO, a piece of….

Hi all,

Over the years I have invested in Bango on and off and made very good profits off this.

For me a price of 105.88p was a steal and so I put in one tranch last week and today put in another one at 122p.

Why do I like Bango? Well above all I trust Raymond and team and I know that they especially Raymond has a lot of skin in the game. Close alignment of interests is definitely the case with Bango.

Secondly I liked that when I had questions in the past on Bango Raymond and team reverted back to me the same day!!! Now when I compare this how investors (especially retail investors) are treated by other UK small caps than I know that I am in good hands.

One thing: Sometimes corporate acquisitions don’t go well at all or initially have some teething problems- to me the latter seems to be the case but given that now no new issues were revealed laid my slight concerns at rest. So to sum it up I am happy with my 105.88p tranche and my 122p tranche and now will patiently wait for the next developments.

With a management team that has intentionally misled retail investors??? Dream on.

I have the feeling that Darktrace will be taken over before the year is over....they can have my shares at 500:)

Brian Tenner - if you read these lines are you proud of what you have done?

Where are you with your tall tales of the litigation being the strawberry on the cake??

What happened to the two inflection points?

We all know that you are reading this board - answer!