Member Info for HenryHistorian

I really doubt that in the short term we get good news.
Fact is that Tenner would buy shares in significant volume if he saw a real chance of an uplift. He has not done so - not even GBP 20k…
Don’t trust cooks who are not prepared to eat their own produce.

@ddubya: It WAS a complete Nanoco/Tenner capitulation. Tenner is all big mouth and nothing but.
And off to trial we go….. haha yeah right.

@Nanonano: Given that Tenner likes to use very strong words when very small words would be appropriate maybe exchange “accelerating” with is “contemplating”.
Sorry once misled the trust is gone.

@NGR: Normally you write more substantial replies hehe.

Anyway you quite studiously chose to fail to address my point: Why did Tenner from May 2022 onwards fail to bring a more realistic picture to shareholders? He had many many months to interact with investors in a more honest and transparent manner but he continued to ramp and ramp and make statements/promises that he already knew he would not keep.

To any shareholder out there: If there is an EGM I would vote Tenner out - he has systematically misled shareholders and should and must be sanctioned for this.

@NGR: The Times is a serious paper - with as much credibility as the Financial Times in my and many eyes. I know that sometimes figures that are stated in the press don’t come true but given that Edison in a research report commissioned and paid by Nanoco (and surely read by Tenner) came at a figure of lost USA sales of USD 200m as being one third of lost global sales than the USD 500m figure seems reasonable- doesn’t it NGR?
Also the point that I made and that is a very valid one is that Tenner saw the Edison reports, he saw the Times article and yet he never corrected the market expectations through the long months from May onwards….and suddenly he urgently needs to correct it. Give me a break!
NGR: How much money do you get from Tenner to be his mouthpiece on this board?

@Valueformoney: The Times is a respected paper is one thing I would underline. The second thing is that the article also clearly had Tenner input. Whilst the USD 500m figure was not from Tenner he had ample time afterwards to correct or address this figure in communication to investors- this would have been managing expectations- you remember the second infamous RNS when Nanoco suddenly wanted to manage expectations???
Tenner is not trustworthy - really that is all there is to say.

Dear NGR also known as Brian Tenner in real life:
No you have done nothing wrong at all except ramping your own share with no substance behind it and consistently misleading many private investors who have now either realised losses or are sitting on unrealised losses due to your misleading and empty words.
Oh and I know that share investing is risky but what I don’t expect is for the CEO to be the person misleading me.
Shame on Tenner, he is a useless CEO and time for a clear out at Nanoco.

Oh and I keep wondering: With a share price at 18.4p after the transformational settlement where do I see an RNS informing us that Tenner has invested GBP 40k or 50k in the company that is going to see multiples of value? Hm I do wooooonder.

@NGR: No one on this website spoke about becoming millionaires so stop making this up.
What shareholders should be able to expect is honest and sincere and factual communication.
What Tenner delivered was misleading, not sincere and as it turned out rampy.
Tenner needs to go.

@NGR: I will be in a rocking chair by that time…

@Tornadotony: I have to side with FH.
Brian Tenner made some very clear and sweeping statements ans these cannot be retracted.
Hammodi/Pallas please start legal proceedings against the despicable person impersonating as a CEO.

The chief tamper was Brian Tenner! There is no doubt about this.
Ok a fund raise was done but how fair or honest is it to do a fund raiser at 37p when you know you are willing to settle the Samsung litigation at an amount that justifiably would lead to a share price in the low 20p range? Not at all.
Given the fact that no organic business exists at all they can hardly claim that as justification for a raise at 37p.
No Brian Tenner stands disgraced and needs to go ASAP.
There also needs to be an investigation by the FCA into all this.

@NGR: Your passionate defence of a disgraced and misleading CEO leads me to think that you have very close ties to Nanoco management.

I actually agree with FlyingHigher this time.
We disagreed in the past but I fear he is spot on.
Even if sensor business might be a good area I just don’t have any faith that the current management and board can manage it.

@Nanonano and NGR: I was never speculating for a 1 billion outcome but I had expected for Brian Tenner to respect in a settlement accepted BY Nanoco the red lines that he Brian Tenner had set out and that this would lead to “multiples of….value” - words he conveniently “forgot” (bad) or even absolutely indefensible he never meant sincerely in the first place.
What I had expected- to be honest something like USD 400m for a global (!) settlement- this would have been a fair sum to believe based on the numbers that Edison (paid for their research by Nanoco) had published when they were saying that ca USD 200m were lost sales to Nanoco in the US alone and that the US market was only one third of global sales. USD 400 million for IP that helped a multi multi billion company like Samsung to launch a highly profitable product should have been possible and easily manageable for Samsung.

I always come back to the same conclusion that Brian Tenner is absolutely shameless and an utter disgrace. As an investor one cannot have any faith in him.

@NGR: I guess your timeline on Nanoco succeeding is 10 years correct???
Don’t you agree with me that Tenner’s boast (empty misleading as it turned out to be) about “major inflection points” were of a more imminent near term nature….stop being an apologist for a misleading CEO.

@Nanonano: Reading your post all I can think of that right as you may be that Tenner has shamefully misled investors- even under your view the cake might turn out to be as very little. So we got two peanuts for the Samsung litigation and we will get a sandwich with peanut butter for sensing is my take.
How can we push Tenner out?

@Valueformoney: I was responding to Tornadotony who in my eyes is too positive.
Look let’s be honest: BT’s track record is not great. Past big words turned out to be just words. All we have at the moment for the future are only words - so I think it is only fair to say that people might consider only acting on clearly worded RNS - as everything else until now (BT investor presentations, Edison notes) turned out to be very misleading.
I think that my words above really are a fair assessment of the current situation.

@Tornadotony: The share price is so low not due to me but down to people not buying. And why would anyone want to buy? Let’s face it the CEO has systematically misled shareholders and so many people are not only looking at either realised or unrealised losses but also feel, I should rather say know, that the CEO Brian Tenner cannot be trusted. Others might read or have seen the Investors Chronicle headline that referenced a disappointing settlement…so that readership will also not buy.
So you are a left with a CEO who is full of hot air and a company that has no product in commercialisation - all you have as a shareholder or potential investor are Tenner’s words about potential deals…and you know after his empty words about the Samsung litigation that is just toooooo little.

The transformation is gathering pace - Brian Tenner got it spot on. The major inflection point is happening in front of our eyes!

Free of charge Nanogeddon as always!