Member Info for HenryHistorian

In my opinion an investigation needs to be launched and Brian Tenner be indicted for what he has done.

In the eyes of many he is a crooked individual- worthy of nothing except for the contempt of all the many people he has willingly misled and betrayed.

@MarrRempit: Relax - although I understand your sentiment profit taking is legitimate and it is understandable if some of the retail investors who might have invested at the start of the recent run take some off their chips away from the table.

Personally and like others I would like to highlight that we are really entering into the decisive phase with Scancell where over the coming months data will be revealed that will make a massive difference to Scancell and its investors (if results turn our way(.

In this case the scramble to get into Scancell will be wonderful to behold.

So the fundamental case, ie the science base, for Scancell is untouched by the profit taking and those holders that remain steadfast might soon find themselves richly rewarded.

The undercurrent of board moves, new appointments, Redmile supportive stance etc points for me that something is brewing…

So hopefully RNS time in the not too distant future!

Anyone selling now will probably beat his or her chest in the next six months or so and shout “More fool me”.

Just saying.

Good luck all - from a holder of the last two years or so.

I am a bit baffled so just recently we stood at ca 150p and now without any Bango specific news we are at 122p...

I have no liquid funds at the moment after my top up on Monday but still think that in my own personal opinion (everyone please do your own research) 122p represents a very nice entry point.

@roses: Agreed but whilst charts can carry a lot of emotion and indeed create emotions it will be down to the hard data to maintain a high share price plateau - but my sense is that now few(er) people are willing to sell and are bringing themselves into position... or in other words early signs of FOMO is manifesting itself.

Just all my personal take on where we are.

Albeit to no avoil by a useless waste of space called Brian Tenner.

TwoGood2Die: Whilst I agree with most of what you are saying I personally abstain from speculating about October result.

However, I wholeheartedly agree with your words about Brian Tenner - good riddance to him. I think he is best advised to start his own company (as no company will touch him with a barge pole...) - should Brian consider a new career in the art world as an agent for artists some people might suggest he might call his new company "Conartist Ltd".

I topped up today by a modest amount - maybe Bango might get a bit cheaper but I am very confident that we will see a 160 - 170 p share price range later this year.

I don’t care about the herd (if you are referring to retail investors) as such I care about trial results and if they come out well than I want the big beasts of the Pharma industry to either buy us out entirely or at least some lines of our product palette - this case the share price would be easily triple or more of the current one.

I can wait to Q1 2025.

@iwantthatone: Exactly- I had a look at the volumes bought and sold and quite frankly in my humble opinion nothing to be concerned about.

One seller might sell for all kind of reasons that might not even be immediately related to Bango.

All I know is that management has staked its credibility on the next set of results and the last official communication I saw didn’t give me any reasons for concerns.

Hi Dracula,

It is ALL down to clinical data.

I am greatly heartened by Lindy Durrant's words from yesterday - I don't believe that an experienced scientists would use her exuberant words if there was not sufficient reason/good cause.

Believe me once the data comes in good big pharma will make a move and once there is an RNS with some clear dollar amounts we will all be laughing to the bank.

Yes this is what Nanoco investors did. They read the presentations and the Edison "research" and above all they also listened in to the video presentations that Tenner did.

Tenner in many eyes is just a crook.

@TerrorWit: Best joke ever. Tenner is toast. No company would want to touch him with a barge pole.

...except a company that is looking for a CEO who consciously and systematically misleads investors.

@Dalester and Ratcliffewriter: I hear you - however let us also consider this. Whilst all signs show that Scancell really offers something exciting there is still risk involved. I was just thinking aloud what a potential big pharma suitor would be willing to put on the table right now....when there is still risk involved with Scancell.

I am aware of Redmile's big position but at what share price offer (now at the still risky/unknown stade of Scancell) would Redmile go weak/get tempted.....?

Agreed once/afterScancell's arrows hit the mark in such a case GBP 500m would be a ridiculous offer but we are not there yet...

I sincerely believe that one or two major parma with deep coffers is right now mulling over whether to make a bid for Scancell. With the current market capitalisation at a laughable GBP 135m someone could easily make a bid for GBP 500m..

It would still be small change for them...

I stay invested as when hopefully good news come in I don't want to be kicking myself for not having taken a mid-term view....

I understand you but I wouldn't be surprised if a bid would come....if someone was to bid now I would think 425-450 would be an offer I would happily accept.

Sooner or later a bid will come. From my personal perspective I would be happy with 425p.

@Feeks: You know the sad thing is that once just cannot trust Brian Tenner and the Board. I would not put anything past them including trying to drive the share price down if it would suit their interest.

Not that I can at the moment see why they would do that but given past behaviour all I know that the least thing that is on their mind are their retail investors. We are just here to be fleeced and manipulated by them.

@TerrorWit: The financial health of many retail investors HAS ALREADY been damaged and impacted by the manipulation and misleading communication from Brian Tenner!

The damage has done and all people like me are doing is to warn future retial investors that the CEO of Nanoco as well as the "research" of Edison are anything but reliable and trustworthy. In fact one should never use the word "trust" and "sincerity" with "Brian Tenner" in the same sentence.

What worries me most is that Brian Tenner and the Board do not invest in a meaningful/susbtantial (!) way.

I have seen enough instances where the CEO and other executives / board members invested meaningful sums after a disappointing RNS - thus signalling to the market that they believe in the prospects of the company and that they really want to be aligned with investors.

Nothing here at Nanoco. Just not good enough!