Member Info for Henners007

AParky. You have misread the RNS.

100% of Atome shares will be split as follows. 85% allocated to President who will retain no more than 25% (could be less). These shares will be held on the Balance Sheet as an investment in Atome (as the value of Atome increases, in theory our shares in PPS should increase in value).

60% of the Atome shares will be retained by President as part of the in specie to current shareholders of President (you and me). These Atome shares will be distributed to you and me to do with as we wish.

I am surmising that the 15% of Atome not being retained by President will be used for the Fund raise.

Hope this helps comprehension.

Mmmmm. Correct Volatil1ty Dec 2019/Jan2020 6.30p & 7.65p double purchase. First investment, with many trades interim, on 4th October 2011 :) Yep 10 years ago. The story to be told at the end of the Over the Rainbow party.

the earliest SNG investor, alive and kicking on this Board?

Yaaay. Who wouldn't like a £5 paaaarty!!!!:) Add me to the list. Happy to meet halfway..............hang on a moment that would be Alderney....................not such a good idea.

AJ242, I have added a very important word!!!! "there are a LOT of people that are that" VERY "stupid. LSE and twitter definitely influences small time PI's"

Goldforefinger. EUA IS being applied for and that has already been RNS'd.

No data released from Activ II and yet progression to Activ III. Brilliant. That in itself tells you everything. Whisper it quietly, derisked now and probably a world beater of CoVid.

Maver1k, you do not need to say "IMO" with regard to the EUA, what you have stated is an open record available to anyone that has read the RNS or seen the Finn Cap note of 30th September.

Precisely CaneToad Ref your post of 5th October, and todays RNS confirms ongoing accumulation by people i) with considerable money to invest, and, possibly b) people in the know. Great news for us mere investing mortals.

Wholeheartedly agree Oranges. More confident than ever. Follow the money.

MD - just for good order the last update was 30th June, "only" 29 days ago

TD2 - fair comments, but at least Frontier did produce and sell their copper to market. My principal concern with AMC is that it does not appear that any material progress has been made in the last three years at all.

Hi East, over the years, us LTHs have had more carrots dangled in front of us than we could collectively eat in a lifetime (and thats if we like carrots). Unless we have direct intro to the Board we may well not hear anything until the next set of results due out on 30th September. I have invested in a similar scenario before (Frontier Mining) and it didn't end well, and one of the chaps on that BoD also sits on the AMC BoD. Hopefully lightening won't strike twice.

Shareholder dilution is illusory.

Although the company issued shares to finance NRR, absolute shareholder dilution ( ie any capital raise for shares "behind closed door") but only if the shareholder sits on their hands and takes no action. My personal preference has always been to retain my percentage shareholding in AMC by acquiring new shares in the market when I felt the time was right. No dilution. Mathematically, statistically and financially the worst course of action is for a shareholder to take no action. The favoured course should be to acquire more shares, to negate the dilution OR sell because all confidence in the company has waned. Retaining an original shareholding in any company while more shares are issued to the "chosen few" becomes an ever increasingly difficult hill to climb to profitability.

Joe Bass,
While all your points are valid, well and good, the ultimate holding company of AMC is Russian. In this case your points might still be valid or perhaps not!!

Difficult decision. I am keen on both.

What chance a blockbuster RNS at the end of this month to coincide with published audited results?

Hi Mad Mat, there was definitely (100% certainty level) an NDA signed and RNS'd many years ago so not sure whether still valid or not. I would say 5-7 years ago and separate from the one you reference. If anyone is desperate to discover precise wording let me know and I will dig it out, but unfortunately would have to charge my time, this on the basis that whoever requires it could research back through the RNS's and readily discover it themselves.

NDA - yes they did have NDA's in place perhaps further back than the 5 years you have been invested for bmcm. It was RNS'd at the time. Definitely in place and I am thinking 5 to 8 years ago. If you trawl through the RNS's you will find it for sure.

Mr Costs, "Synairgen is a drug discovery and development company". Any profit is a bonus. Profit IS NOT the company's priority, and perhaps that is what many investors have overlooked. I believe that only in a single 12 month period over 17 years has it made a profit from its "drug discovery and development" operations.

While the current environment offers up a good possibility for profit there is no reason to think the BoD will approach this possibility any differently (from a commercial perspective) than they have over the last 17 years. As they continually espouse "data, data, data" is king.

Mr Costs, Enquire if they have a vacancy for you in their PR Team!!!

Personally, I say let the guy get on with the job he has been diligently pursuing for the last 15+ years. The days with no postings at all on this BB would be a welcome relief from the "I only invested in this company on the understanding that the share price would only ever head in one direction, every trading day." Always remember, patience is a superpower.