RE: Re...8 Jan 2020 16:47
Doubleup,
you were on filter because you come out with uneducated, uninformed nonsense all the time and just want to attract attention. I have taken you off filter so I can respond to your latest nonsense.
You have to differentiate between a fact and your impression/understanding/suspicion. There is also no requirement on anyone to agree with or be bound by your impression/understanding/suspicion.
1. If ADL converts to a participation and ends up with say 17% of say 150 bopd at $65 a barrel then it will be generating something like $1,600 per day before taxes and profits shares etc so maybe $1,200 net. So $36k pm. Fine it doesn't shoot the lights out but it is not nothing.
2. The idea was always that this was the start of a relationship with CAV. On the basis of the above, they would be on 83% of 150 bopd at no initial capital cost to themselves so why would they not be happy? Once ADL participates then that is a different matter.
3. There is a big difference between raising capital for running costs and capex for new assets/new drill. 1 above covers the running costs and I see no issues with raising capital for a new drill on Selo.
4. The reasons CAV did the deal has been rehearsed numerous times. They want or wanted a partner who they could develop O&G assets with.
5. I think that you will be very surprised in the next two weeks. You may not like it but I will.
Anyway you are going back on filter. No point in having a battle of wits with an unarmed man.
DYOR